Decisions analysed
Find a decision of the Unified Patent Court, consult its official source and identify the firm’s case notes to understand its practical implications.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
2,390 decisions recorded
TIRU v VEOLIA PROPRETE (CoA, 13 July 2026)
In a decision of 13 July 2026, given in the three joined appeal proceedings PR-UPC-CoA-79/2026, 80/2026 and 81/2026 (including the present one, UPC_CoA_79/2026, against Veolia Propreté), the Court of Appeal grants the withdrawal of TIRU's appeals against the decision of the Paris…
Read the analysisFujifilm v Kodak (CoA, UPC_CoA_473/2025, 13 July 2026)
Read the French analysisInterDigital VC Holdings v Amazon.com (CFI, 13 July 2026)
Read the French analysisKodak v Fujifilm (CoA, 13 July 2026)
Read the French analysisTIRU v MAGUIN (CoA, 13 July 2026)
Read the French analysisAdobe v KEEEX (CoA, 10 July 2026)
In an order of 10 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_95/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal rejects the request for discretionary review lodged by Adobe Inc. and Adobe Systems Software Ireland against the order of the Paris Local Division of 1 June…
Read the analysisCardo Systems v Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin (CFI, 10 July 2026)
In an order of 10 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_1902/2025), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division aligns the time limits for the defence of the two defendants to Cardo Systems' infringement action: Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin Technology, served on 23 April…
Read the analysisGilead Sciences v Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CFI, 10 July 2026)
In a decision of 10 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_1968/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Central Division orders the Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS), proprietor of EP 3 854 403, to pay Gilead Sciences EUR 800,000 in recoverable costs within four weeks of…
Read the analysisCardo Systems v Shenzhen Asmax Infinite (CFI, 10 July 2026)
In a decision by default of 10 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_766/2024), the Milan Local Division (Judges Perrotti, presiding, Zana, rapporteur, and Granata) holds that Shenzhen Asmax Infinite Technology and Hong Kong Yiheng International Technology, which did not appear, directly infringe CARDO Systems' unitary…
Read the analysisTeleflex Life Sciences II v Speed Care Mineral (CFI, UPC_CFI_1849/2026, 9 July 2026)
In a decision of 9 July 2026, given in cost proceedings UPC_CFI_1849/2026 and UPC_CFI_1861/2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division orders Teleflex Life Sciences II to reimburse Speed Care Mineral EUR 211,000 (EUR 200,000 in representation costs, the applicable ceiling, and…
Read the analysisTeleflex Life Sciences II v Speed Care Mineral (CFI, UPC_CFI_1861/2026, 9 July 2026)
Read the French analysisHuawei Technologies v Sercomm (CFI, 8 July 2026)
Following an early interim hearing, the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division set, by order of 8 July 2026 (Rule 105.5), the timetable for Huawei Technologies Co.
Read the analysisElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute v Meta Platforms (CFI, 8 July 2026)
In an order of 8 July 2026, given in joined proceedings UPC_CFI_2051/2025 (infringement action) and UPC_CFI_1653/2026 (counterclaim for revocation), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division stays, at the parties' joint request and under Rule 295(d), the dispute between the Electronics and…
Read the analysisAIM Sport Development v TGI Sport Suomi (CoA, 8 July 2026)
In an order of 8 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that the court fees paid by AIM Sport Development AG for its appeal against the Helsinki Local Division's order of 29 April 2026 (ACT_551054/2023, EP 3 295…
Read the analysisElectronics v Meta Platforms (CFI, 8 July 2026)
Read the French analysisAngelalign Technology v Align Technology (CoA, 8 July 2026)
Read the French analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_535/2025, 7 July 2026)
Read the French analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_846/2024, 7 July 2026)
Read the French analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_485/2025, 7 July 2026)
Read the French analysisBekaert Combustion v Polidoro (CoA, UPC_CoA_30/2026, 6 July 2026)
In a decision of 6 July 2026, given in joined appeal proceedings UPC_CoA_29/2026 and UPC_CoA_30/2026, the Court of Appeal permits the withdrawal of the appeals brought by Bekaert Combustion Technology and NV Bekaert against the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of…
Read the analysisBekaert Combustion v Polidoro (CoA, UPC_CoA_29/2026, 6 July 2026)
Read the French analysisRematec v Europe Forestry (CoA, 3 July 2026)
In an order of 3 July 2026, given in joined appeal proceedings UPC_CoA_302/2025 and UPC_CoA_305/2025, the Court of Appeal rejects Rematec's application under Rule 333 for review of the judge-rapporteur's order of 30 March 2026.
Read the analysisEcovacs Robotics v Roborock Germany (CFI, 3 July 2026)
Read the French analysisAlign Technology v Angelalign Technology (CFI, 3 July 2026)
Read the French analysisOTEC Präzisionsfinish v ANCA Europe (CFI, 2 July 2026)
In an order of 2 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_1536/2026), presiding judge and rapporteur Thomas of the Düsseldorf Local Division discloses to OTEC Präzisionsfinish and its counsel the unredacted version of the detailed description prepared on 16 June 2026 by the expert, following the…
Read the analysisSophia Genetics v Guardant Health (CoA, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_539/2025, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysisShenzhen Transsion (CoA, UPC_CoA_102/2026, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysis*** v AMYCEL (CoA, 2 July 2026)
In an order of 2 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal orders the appellant, a natural person doing business in Poland whose name is redacted, to provide security of EUR 28,000 for the costs of AMYCEL, LLC within three weeks of…
Read the analysisGuardant Health v Sophia Genetics (CoA, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 2 July 2026)
By order of 2 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division acknowledges that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has complied with Rule 118.8 RoP in respect of all the orders in the decision of 6 May 2026, with effect from 15 June…
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion (CoA, UPC_CoA_101/2026, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysisCureVac Manufacturing v Moderna (CFI, UPC_CFI_1408/2026, 1 July 2026)
Read the French analysisIPG Laser v TRUMPF Laser UK (CoA, UPC_CoA_59/2026, 1 July 2026)
In a decision of 1 July 2026 in the joined appeal proceedings PR-UPC-CoA-58/2026 and PR-UPC-CoA-59/2026, the Court of Appeal allows IPG Laser to withdraw its appeals against the Mannheim Local Division decision of 24 February 2026 (EP 2 951 625), declares the…
Read the analysisCureVac Manufacturing v Moderna (CFI, UPC_CFI_1407/2026, 1 July 2026)
By order of 1 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division dismisses CureVac Manufacturing GmbH’s Rule 190 RoP application for Moderna to produce extracts from its CTD dossier and technical data sheets on an RNA manufacturing process, and confirms the…
Read the analysisIPG Laser v TRUMPF Laser UK (CoA, UPC_CoA_58/2026, 1 July 2026)
Read the French analysisXiaomi Communications v Nera Innovations (CoA, 30 June 2026)
Read the French analysisParTec v Lenovo Global Technology Germany (CFI, 30 June 2026)
By order of 30 June 2026, the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses, without hearing the defendants, ParTec AG’s application for provisional measures against three Lenovo companies based on EP 3 743 812.
Read the analysisNera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 30 June 2026)
By order of 30 June 2026, made in appeals UPC_CoA_692/2025 and UPC_CoA_854/2025 against the decision of the Hamburg Local Division of 10 July 2025 concerning EP 2 642 632, the Court of Appeal disregards a private expert opinion and a handbook extract…
Read the analysisHuawei v Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan (CoA, 29 June 2026)
Decisions of the judge-rapporteur on public access to written pleadings and evidence under Rule 262.1(b) RoP are subject to review by the panel under Rule 333, whose notion of a case management decision or order calls for a broad interpretation (para.
Read the analysisSuinno Mobile & AI Licensing v Microsoft (CoA, 29 June 2026)
The standing judge of the Court of Appeal refused Suinno leave to appeal, under Rule 221 RoP, the cost decision of the Paris Central Division of 31 March 2026, which had awarded Microsoft EUR 300,000 out of a claimed EUR 360,940.60 following…
Read the analysisSILIMED Indústria de Implantes Ltda v Polytech Health&Aesthetics (CoA, 29 June 2026)
In a decision of 29 June 2026 (UPC-CoA-066/2026), the President of the Court of Appeal rejects SILIMED's application for review of the Registrar's decision of 10 April 2026, which had refused to remove as unauthorised the opt-out filed by Polytech on 30…
Read the analysisHuawei Technologies v Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan (CoA, 29 June 2026)
By order of 29 June 2026 (UPC_CoA_52/2026), panel 3 of the Court of Appeal dismissed Huawei's appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 26 March 2026, which had upheld access for the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan…
Read the analysisPolytechnik Luft- und Feuerungstechnik v Dall Energy (CoA, 29 June 2026)
In an order of 29 June 2026 (UPC_CoA_57/2026), the Court of Appeal partly reverses the order for the production of evidence issued on 10 April 2026 by the judge-rapporteur of the Copenhagen Local Division in Dall Energy's infringement action against Polytechnik (EP…
Read the analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 26 June 2026)
In an order of 26 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1160/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants Edwards Lifesciences, in the damages proceedings brought against Meril after the infringement decision of 4 April 2025 (EP 3 669 828), a two-day extension, until 1…
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 26 June 2026)
Read the French analysisValeo Electrification v SEG Automotive Germany (CFI, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division admits KSR International Inc. and its subsidiary Automotive Technical Advisory Service GmbH as interveners in support of the defendants in Valeo Electrification’s infringement action on EP 3 157 142…
Read the analysisASUS Technology Licensing v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications (CFI, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division confirms that the OPPO companies’ reply in the counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 346 616 was filed in time, although it had been lodged on 3 June 2026…
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026 (“Order II”), made in infringement action UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_629/2026 concerning EP 3 107 487, the Brussels Local Division rules on the second application for production of evidence brought by the GC Aesthetics defendants…
Read the analysisNatural person v SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme (CFI, 25 June 2026)
By decision of 25 June 2026, the Paris Central Division rules on the revocation action (UPC_CFI_425/2025) against SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH’s EP 2 643 717, which concerns colour-mixing collecting optics for signalling.
Read the analysisKEEEX v Adobe Systems Software Ireland (CFI, 25 June 2026)
In an order of 25 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_530/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division rules on the objections raised by Adobe, OpenAI and the other defendants against the brief filed on 5 June 2026 by KEEEX, proprietor of EP 2 949…
Read the analysisRobert Bosch doo Beograd v Valeo Systèmes d’Essuyage (CoA, 22 June 2026)
The Court of Appeal dismisses the appeal of six Bosch group companies against the order of the Paris Local Division rejecting their preliminary objection to jurisdiction in the action for infringement of EP 4 144 599 brought by Valeo Systèmes d'Essuyage.
Read the analysisNokia Technologies v Acer (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_293/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_868/2025 (counterclaim for revocation) concerning EP 2 661 892, the Munich Local Division allows the mutual withdrawals of Nokia Technologies Oy and of the defendants Acer, Inc., Acer Computer GmbH and CPYou B.V., five days…
Read the analysisIllumina v Element Biosciences (CFI, 22 June 2026)
Read the French analysisESSITY HYGIENE AND HEALTH AKTIEBOLAG v WEPA NEDERLAND (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In an order of 22 June 2026, following a hearing on 9 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1103/2026), the single judge of The Hague Local Division, on WEPA Nederland's request for review (Rule 197.3 RoP), confirms the ex parte order of 17 April 2026 that…
Read the analysisVALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH FRANCE (CoA, 22 June 2026)
The Court of Appeal sets aside two orders of the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, which had declined jurisdiction and referred to the Düsseldorf Local Division the infringement action brought by Valeo Systèmes d'Essuyage against six Bosch group companies, including a…
Read the analysisNokia v Acer (CFI, 22 June 2026)
Read the French analysisEvac v Shanghai VacDrain Vaccuum Drainage Equipment (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In a decision of 22 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_811/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division holds partly well-founded Evac Oy's infringement action, based on two patents for vacuum sewer systems (EP 1 840 282 and EP 1 813 734), against the Chinese manufacturer Shanghai VacDrain,…
Read the analysisUPM Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In an order of 22 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_830/2024), the Munich Central Division resumes the revocation action brought by UPM-Kymmene against International N&H Denmark, which had been stayed pending the EPO proceedings, and disposes of it as devoid of purpose (Rule 360 RoP):…
Read the analysisVALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH DOO Beograd (CoA, 22 June 2026)
Read the French analysisCardo Systems v Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin (CFI, 18 June 2026)
In an order of 18 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1382/2025), the Milan Local Division, on a request for review by Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin and Resosport, revokes in its entirety the ex parte order for provisional measures granted on 5 November 2025 to Cardo Systems…
Read the analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v Motorola Mobility (CFI, 18 June 2026)
In the action for infringement of EP 3 016 464 brought by Advanced Standard Communication LLC against Motorola Mobility LLC and three other defendants, the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants Rule 262A protection for information in the rejoinder on the…
Read the analysisOcclutech v Lepu Medical (Europe) Cooperatief U.A. (CoA, 18 June 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_1129/2026, 17 June 2026)
In an order of 17 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1129/2026), the Milan Local Division dismisses Ericsson's application for provisional measures against ASUSTeK and Arvato Netherlands based on EP 2 727 342 ("Reference Picture Signaling"), while the infringement action on the merits (UPC_CFI_318/2024) and the…
Read the analysisFives ECL v REEL (CoA, 17 June 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_1130/2026, 17 June 2026)
By order of 17 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1130/2026), a four-judge panel of the Milan Local Division dismissed for lack of urgency the application for provisional measures by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson against ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. (CFI, 17 June 2026)
In the action for infringement of EP 2 590 626 brought by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA against thirty Pfizer and BioNTech group companies (UPC_CFI_620/2025) and the joined counterclaims for revocation (UPC_CFI_1509/2025 and UPC_CFI_1511/2025), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division prepares the oral…
Read the analysisTELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTEK COMPUTER (CFI, 17 June 2026)
By order of 17 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1130/2026), the Milan Local Division dismissed for lack of urgency Ericsson's application for provisional measures against ASUSTeK Computer and Arvato Netherlands based on EP 3 076 673, which concerns decoding and encoding pictures of a video…
Read the analysisAlbert Handtmann Maschinenfabrik v VEMAG Maschinenbau (CFI, UPC_CFI_549/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisInterDigital VC v The Walt Disney (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisOrange v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_301/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisBostik v Henkel France (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisSharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisOrange v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_713/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisAlbert Handtmann Maschinenfabrik v VEMAG Maschinenbau (CFI, UPC_CFI_184/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisInterDigital VC Holdings v The Walt Disney Company (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_29/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 15 June 2026)
In proceedings UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 brought by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_1934/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_1940/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysisInsulet v EOFLOW (CFI, 12 June 2026)
In an order of 12 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1230/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Central Division orders EOFLOW to pay Insulet EUR 14,000 for the costs incurred in the application for leave to appeal (UPC_CFI_1167/2025) and in the appeal concerning a penalty payment…
Read the analysisIrdeto v DJI Europe . (CFI, 12 June 2026)
Open the entryGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, UPC_CFI_616/2025, 12 June 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_616/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_1439/2025 (counterclaim for revocation) between GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and Moderna Netherlands B.V.
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, UPC_CFI_1439/2025, 12 June 2026)
Read the French analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, 11 June 2026)
Read the French analysisSpeed Care Mineral v Teleflex Life Sciences II (CoA, 10 June 2026)
In an order of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CoA_85/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismisses Speed Care Mineral's request for discretionary review of the EUR 1 million value set for the counterclaim for revocation by the Hamburg Local Division in…
Read the analysisHologic v Siemens Healthineers (CFI, 10 June 2026)
In a decision of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_758/2024 and UPC_CFI_259/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division rules on the infringement action brought by Hologic, Inc. against four Siemens Healthineers companies under EP 2 352 431 (breast tomosynthesis system controlling the X-ray focal spot), directed…
Read the analysisNixu FL IP Protection v Infoblox (CFI, 10 June 2026)
In an order of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_360/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division orders Nixu FL IP Protection to provide security of EUR 200,000 for the costs of Infoblox Inc., Infoblox Germany GmbH and Nomios Germany GmbH, sued for infringement…
Read the analysisSharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CoA, 10 June 2026)
In an order of 10 June 2026, given in appeal UPC_CoA_61/2026 brought by SharkNinja against the refusal of provisional measures by the Paris Local Division on 10 April 2026, the UPC Court of Appeal (panel presided over by Judge Kalden, with Judge…
Read the analysisFERRING v ACCORD HEALTHCARE (CFI, 9 June 2026)
Read the French analysisNixu FL IP Protection v Infoblox (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In an order of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_360/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division partly allows the preliminary objection on international jurisdiction raised by Infoblox Inc., a US company sued by Nixu FL IP Protection alongside two German-domiciled defendants for infringement…
Read the analysisMorello Forni Italia srl e Morello Forni Sas di Morello Marco & C v Gastroteam Abbe AB e Marciuliano Attrezzature di Salvatore Marciuliano (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In a decision of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_2046/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division sets at EUR 62,359.32 the costs that Gastroteam Abbe AB and Salvatore Marciuliano (Marciuliano Attrezzature) must reimburse, within thirty days, to Morello Forni Italia and Morello Forni…
Read the analysisSanofi Biotechnologies v Amgen (CFI, 8 June 2026)
The Düsseldorf Local Division lifts the stay to allow the withdrawals by Sanofi Biotechnologies SAS and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (action for infringement of EP 4 252 857, UPC_CFI_195/2025) and by the Amgen companies (counterclaim for revocation), filed in March 2026 with the…
Read the analysisNokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In an order of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1291/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division allows the withdrawal, with the respondents' consent, of the application for provisional measures brought by Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy against two Geely…
Read the analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In proceedings UPC_CFI_029/2026 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_1934/2026 and UPC_CFI_1940/2026 (counterclaims for revocation) concerning EP 3 689 383, between 2seventy bio, Inc.
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, 8 June 2026)
Read the French analysisAlign v Angelalign (CFI, 5 June 2026)
Read the French analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 4 June 2026)
By an order of 4 June 2026 in infringement action UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_629/2026 concerning EP 3 107 487, the Brussels Local Division grants Establishment Labs S.A.
Read the analysis