Find a decision of the Unified Patent Court, consult its official source and identify the firm’s case notes to understand its practical implications.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
2,390 decisions recorded
In an order of 3 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_84/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal grants Yealink partial leave to appeal the cost decision of the Brussels Local Division of 7 May 2026.
Read the analysisIn an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…
Read the analysisIn an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal, presided over by Klaus Grabinski, sets aside the decision by default given on 21 October 2025 by The Hague Local Division against a defendant established in Poland, together with the…
Read the analysisIn an order registered on 2 November 2026 (UPC_CFI_478/2025 and UPC_CFI_585/2026), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division records the decisions taken at the interim conference of 26 October 2026 in Avient’s action against Xingi concerning EP 2 791 402.
Read the analysisIn a procedural order of 30 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_2660/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered service of the statement of claim for infringement of EP 3 574 526 on the representative of Lexar Europe B.V., which accepted it.
Read the analysisIn a procedural order of 30 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1646/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division dismisses Rakuten’s application for Helios Streaming to provide EUR 200,000 as security for costs.
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 under Rule 353 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division, seized the same day by the defendants with Establishment Labs’ agreement, rectifies para.
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 under Rule 353 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division, seized the same day by the defendants with Establishment Labs’ agreement, rectifies para.
Read the analysisIn an order of 28 October 2026 under Rule 105 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division followed up on the interim conference held by videoconference on 27 October 2026 in Establishment Labs’ action for infringement of EP…
Read the analysisIn an order of 28 October 2026 under Rule 105 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division followed up on the interim conference held by videoconference on 27 October 2026 in Establishment Labs’ action for infringement of EP…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 28 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_154/2026), the President of the Court of Appeal, acting as judge-rapporteur, orders that a London law firm be given, after redaction of personal data, Sumi Agro’s request for rehearing of 5 May 2025 and Syngenta’s…
Read the analysisIn an order of 28 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1160/2026), the Munich Local Division, sitting as a full panel, rules on Edwards Lifesciences’ request to lay open books within its application for the determination of damages following the final decision of 4 April 2025…
Read the analysisIn an order of 27 October 2026 in two joined proceedings (UPC_CFI_2594/2026 and UPC_CFI_2595/2026), The Hague Local Division ruled on Versuni’s applications for provisional measures against Dreame concerning the Mira Mop electric mop.
Read the analysisIn an order of 27 October 2026 in two joined proceedings (UPC_CFI_2594/2026 and UPC_CFI_2595/2026), The Hague Local Division ruled on Versuni’s applications for provisional measures against Dreame concerning the Mira Mop electric mop.
Read the analysisIn an order of 27 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_71/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal orders the reimbursement of EUR 61,150 to Qualcomm. Qualcomm had paid EUR 90,300, the amount displayed by the CMS, for its cross-appeal against the Munich Local Division’s…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 27 October 2026, issued in German (UPC_CFI_714/2025, UPC_CFI_3019/2026 and UPC_CFI_3020/2026, EP 4 283 140), the Munich Central Division rules on cross-applications for cost assessment following the decision of 21 July 2026 that partially revoked the patent and allocated…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 26 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_155/2026 and UPC_CoA_156/2026), the Court of Appeal largely grants a London law firm’s request for access to the pleadings and evidence in Suinno’s applications for rehearing against Microsoft (UPC_CoA_883/2025 and UPC_CoA_892/2025), after redaction of personal…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 26 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_155/2026 and UPC_CoA_156/2026), the Court of Appeal largely grants a London law firm’s request for access to the pleadings and evidence in Suinno’s applications for rehearing against Microsoft (UPC_CoA_883/2025 and UPC_CoA_892/2025), after redaction of personal…
Read the analysisIn a procedural order of 26 October 2026, issued in German (UPC_CFI_672/2026 and UPC_CFI_2175/2026, EP 1 934 794 B1), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classifies as confidential the highlighted information in the defendants’ rejoinder of 19 October 2026 and its…
Read the analysisIn a procedural order issued in French and dated 26 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_2296/2025, EP 1 740 740), the Munich Central Division, sitting as a full panel, rejects Fives ECL’s request to hear the parties’ legal experts in person in the revocation action…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 23 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_706/2025), the Mannheim Local Division dismissed SK nexilis’ action against three Volta Energy Solutions companies for infringement of EP 3 316 363, which concerns an electrolytic copper foil for a secondary battery.
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_68/2025, decided by the Düsseldorf Local Division on 22 October 2026 in respect of EP 3 281 569 B1, together with the infringement action UPC_CFI_47/2025.
Read the analysisBy a decision of 22 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_47/2025, counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_68/2025), Panel 2 of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses the action brought by CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co.
Read the analysisBy a decision of 22 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_52/2025, counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_67/2025), Panel 2 of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses the action brought by CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co.
Read the analysisBy order of 22 October 2026, the Milan section of the Central Division rules on Novo Nordisk A/S’s preliminary objection to three ancillary requests in the revocation action brought by Sandoz AG against unitary patent EP 3 689 365, on once-weekly semaglutide.
Read the analysisIn an order of 22 October 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal rejects the petition for review of the Registrar’s decision of 25 June 2026 refusing to re-enter an applicant, whose name is not published, on the list of UPC…
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_149/2026, decided by the order of 21 October 2026 of the standing judge of the Court of Appeal, given in German on the admissibility of the appeals.
Read the analysisBy an order of 21 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_181/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal, Emmanuel Gougé, denied the request for discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP lodged by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, AWS European Sovereign…
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_602/2025, brought by Agfa and decided by the Court of Appeal’s decision of 21 October 2026 on EP 3 388 490, given in ten joined appeals.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 20 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_481/2025 and UPC_CFI_1358/2025), the Mannheim Local Division, hearing Huawei’s action for infringement of EP 3 667 981 against HMD Global and a counterclaim for revocation, held that the asserted claims were not entitled to the…
Read the analysisIn an order of 20 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1615/2026) under Rule 353 RoP, the single judge of The Hague Local Division rectifies point 5.4 of his provisional measures order of 8 October 2026, which, copying the application, covered iHerb websites in all EPC…
Read the analysisBy procedural order of 19 October 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division confirms the oral hearing of 3 November 2026 in the dispute over EP 3 732 827, after the Court of Appeal finally upheld, on 16 October 2026, the…
Read the analysisBy an order of 19 October 2026, published in the infringement action (UPC_CFI_806/2025) and in the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_185/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division, Samuel Granata, closes the interim procedure in the dispute between Barco N.V.
Read the analysisBy an order of 19 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1209/2025, counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_731/2026), Matthias Zigann, presiding judge of Panel 1a of the Munich Local Division acting as judge-rapporteur, closes the interim procedure in the action brought by Steindl Krantechnik Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Read the analysisIn a decision on the merits of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_684/2025 and UPC_CFI_2279/2025), the Paris Local Division upheld Align Technology’s unitary patent EP 2 237 738 B1 on orthodontic repositioning appliances and found literal infringement of claims 1, 4, 5, 7 and…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_145/2026), given without an oral hearing with the parties’ consent (Article 52(3) UPCA), the Court of Appeal dismissed Barco’s appeal against the order of the Brussels Local Division of 17 August 2026, which had refused…
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_307/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed Aesculap’s application to rectify its decision on the merits of 1 September 2026 concerning EP 2 892 442 B1.
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_97/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismissed the application by Alpinestars S.p.A., Alpinestars Research S.p.A.
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 October 2026 following the interim conference (Rule 105.5 RoP), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division, in the dispute between Illumina, Inc.
Read the analysisBy an order of 15 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1901/2026 and UPC_CFI_3259/2026), the Paris Local Division, sitting as a full panel presided over by Camille Lignières, referred Viatris Santé’s counterclaim for revocation to the Paris Central Division, in the dispute concerning Merz’s patent EP…
Read the analysisBy an order of 14 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_42/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the UPC Court of Appeal, seised by REEL of an application for the protection of its confidential information under Rule 262A RoP, granted interim confidentiality protection pending a decision on the…
Read the analysisBy an order of 13 October 2026, issued under UPC_CoA_88/2026 and UPC_CoA_89/2026, the UPC Court of Appeal, sitting as a single permanent judge, refused Rematec’s application for leave to appeal against the order of the Mannheim Local Division of 22 May 2026.
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_89/2026, decided by the order of 13 October 2026 of the standing judge of the Court of Appeal. The application for leave to appeal against the Mannheim Local Division’s order of 22 May 2026, which had rejected…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 October 2026, the Munich Local Division, sitting with a technically qualified judge, rejected as out of time a request for review under Rule 333 RoP against point 6 of its order of 15 September 2026.
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1696/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, sitting as a full panel, upheld the judge-rapporteur’s order of 21 August 2026 on the disclosure of confidential information concerning the Pilot 1 plant.
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 October 2026 in appeals UPC_CoA_146/2026, UPC_CoA_147/2026 and UPC_CoA_148/2026, the UPC Court of Appeal refused to extend by one month the time limit for Promosome LLC and The Scripps Research Institute to lodge their statements of grounds of…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 12 October 2026, issued in German, the Munich Local Division arranged service on Sercomm Italia SRL of two orders in its dispute with Huawei Technologies over EP 3 611 989 B1.
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_312/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal extended until 23 October 2026 the time limit for Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH and Kodak Holding GmbH to lodge their written comments on the application for rehearing…
Read the analysisBy decision of 9 October 2026 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_77/2026 and UPC_CoA_78/2026, the Court of Appeal, following a settlement, permitted the withdrawal of Dolby International's infringement action (UPC_CFI_135/2024) and of the counterclaim for revocation brought by Beko Germany and Arçelik (UPC_CFI_477/2024)…
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_78/2026, decided by the ruling of 9 October 2026 given in the joined appeals 77/2026 and 78/2026.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 9 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1587/2025), the Milan section of the Central Division dismissed Biogaran’s revocation action against EP 4 223 296, held by H.
Read the analysisBy an order of 9 October 2026 in UPC_CoA_68/2026, UPC_CoA_69/2026, UPC_CoA_71/2026 and UPC_CoA_72/2026, the UPC Court of Appeal refused to re-establish Network System Technologies’ right to appeal against the Munich Local Division’s orders of 11 March 2026 (UPC_CFI_63/2024, UPC_CFI_64/2024 and UPC_CFI_65/2024).
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_69/2026, decided by the order of 9 October 2026 in which the Court of Appeal rules on applications for re-establishment of rights under Rule 320.
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_72/2026, decided by the order of 9 October 2026 in which the Court of Appeal rules on applications for re-establishment of rights under Rule 320.
Read the analysisIn an order of 9 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_2434/2026), published on 22 October 2026, the panel of the Milan Local Division dismissed the application by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, AWS European Sovereign Cloud GmbH and Amazon Data Services…
Read the analysisBy order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_73/2026), the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Esko-Software and Esko-Graphics against the order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 27 April 2026 refusing to change the language of In(k)control's infringement…
Read the analysisBy an order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1332/2026), the Düsseldorf Local Division set the terms on which the detailed description prepared by the court-appointed expert, following the inspection and preservation of evidence proceedings brought by fiskaly against Swissbit, may be released.
Read the analysisBy an order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_676/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants the request of the four Xiaomi defendants in AX Wireless, LLC's infringement action on EP 3 072 324 for a refund of EUR 4,900 overpaid on…
Read the analysisIn an order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1615/2026), the single judge of The Hague Local Division, sitting with the parties’ consent, grants Caelus Lifesciences IP’s application for provisional measures based on EP 2 753 187 B2, which protects Eubacterium hallii and/or Alcaligenes…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 7 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_38/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the UPC Court of Appeal declined to hold an interim conference in the appeal brought by TCL Europe SAS against Corning Incorporated, closed the written procedure and listed the oral…
Read the analysisBy decision of 6 October 2026 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_137/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_512/2025 (counterclaim for revocation), the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed both Inficon's infringement action against Elitech Technology and Elitech UK, directed at the METRUM sniffing leak detector, and the counterclaim…
Read the analysisBy order of 5 October 2026 the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal orders the reimbursement to SharkNinja of thirty-seven thousand nine hundred euros of overpaid court fees, the value of the appeal having been set at half of the value retained…
Read the analysisBy order of 2 October 2026 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_99/2026 and UPC_CoA_110/2026, the Court of Appeal rejected the applications of Canfield Scientific and the other appellants to stay their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 23 April 2026, which…
Read the analysisBy order of 2 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_2660/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division authorised Micron Technology to serve its statement of claim for infringement (EP 3 574 526) on Lexar Europe, the second defendant, established in the Netherlands, through a Dutch…
Read the analysisBy order of 30 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_165/2026), the judge-rapporteur of panel 2 of the Court of Appeal gave Hurtel Sp. z o.o. until 9 October 2026 to file in German its request for access to the pleadings and evidence in appeal UPC_CoA_534/2024…
Read the analysisBy order of 29 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_140/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal determined the court fees payable by NVIDIA for its conditional appeal against the dismissal of its counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 743 812 in its dispute with…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_126/2026), the Court of Appeal re-established Keysight Technologies' right to appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's decision of 5 December 2025, which had dismissed Centripetal's infringement action (EP 3 821 580) without ruling on the counterclaim…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_140/2026), the Court of Appeal granted NVIDIA re-establishment of its right to appeal against the Munich Local Division's decision of 11 March 2026, which had dismissed BF exaQC and ParTec's infringement action (EP 3 743 812)…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 September 2026 the Court of Appeal dismisses Emboline’s request that a written witness statement and the corresponding passages of AorticLab’s statement of response be disregarded as late-filed, in the dispute over EP 2 129 425.
Read the analysisIn an order of 28 September 2026 published on 29 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_703/2025 and UPC_CFI_1757/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division answers the court expert’s request for clarification in the dispute between Prinoth and Xelom over EP 2 507 436 and…
Read the analysisIn this CAR-T life sciences infringement action, the Brussels Local Division dismissed the defendants' Rule 190 RoP applications for production of evidence directed at documents of the NIH (laboratory notebooks, invention reports, grant files, notice records), rejected the NIH's request to be…
Read the analysisBy an order of 23 September 2026, published on 16 October 2026, Judge-rapporteur Edger Brinkman of The Hague Local Division set the next steps in Koninklijke Philips’s infringement actions against Quectel Wireless Solutions and eight other companies (UPC_CFI_2244/2025 and UPC_CFI_2245/2025, counterclaims UPC_CFI_1450/2026…
Read the analysisBy order of 23 September 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division draws the consequences of the second case management hearing held on 8 September 2026 in the infringement actions brought by Koninklijke Philips against Quectel and related companies, with counterclaims…
Read the analysisBy an order under Rule 105.5 RoP issued after the interim conference, the judge-rapporteur closed the interim procedure and opened the oral procedure in the infringement action brought by KEEEX against Adobe, OpenAI, Truepic, Joint Development Foundation Projects and the C2PA entities,…
Read the analysis