Carpmaels & Ransford v Syngenta (CoA, UPC_CoA_154/2026, 28 October 2026)
| Date | 28 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Generic |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CoA_154/2026 |
| Registry reference | UPC-COA-0000154/2026 |
| Parties | Carpmaels & Ransford LLP v. Syngenta Limited; Sumi Agro Limited; Sumi Agro Europe Limited |
| Language | English |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 1 November 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In a decision of 28 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_154/2026), the President of the Court of Appeal, acting as judge-rapporteur, orders that a London law firm be given, after redaction of personal data, Sumi Agro’s request for rehearing of 5 May 2025 and Syngenta’s response of 28 July 2025 in UPC_CoA_523/2024, closed on 23 December 2025 after withdrawal. He refuses access to Exhibits SA-1 (a representative’s bank details) and SA-2 (invoices of Sumi’s representative), held to be confidential.
Provisions applied
- UPC Agreement
- Articles 10(1) and 45
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 262.1(b) and 262.5
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679
- Case law cited
- Ocado (Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_404/2023, 10 April 2024), Abbott v Powell Gilbert (Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_480/2024 and UPC_CoA_481/2024, 9 January 2025).
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 1 November 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- English from the language of proceedings
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- defendantSyngenta Limited16 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantSumi Agro Limited8 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantSumi Agro Europe Limited12 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantCarpmaels & Ransford LLP3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le président de la cour d’appel ouvre à un cabinet l’accès à la demande de révision de Sumi Agro et à la réponse de Syngenta, après occultation des données personnelles, mais refuse l’accès aux pièces SA-1 et SA-2, qui contiennent des informations bancaires et de facturation de représentants.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Sumi Agro v Syngenta (CoA, 24 December 2025) cited in this record
- Carpmaels & Ransford v Microsoft (CoA, UPC_CoA_155/2026, 26 October 2026) cited in this record
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.