Opens in a new tab

Carpmaels & Ransford v Syngenta (CoA, UPC_CoA_154/2026, 28 October 2026)

Date28 October 2026
CourtCoA
DivisionLuxembourg (LU)
Type of actionGeneric
Case number(s)UPC_CoA_154/2026
Registry referenceUPC-COA-0000154/2026
PartiesCarpmaels & Ransford LLP v. Syngenta Limited; Sumi Agro Limited; Sumi Agro Europe Limited
LanguageEnglish

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 1 November 2026

Our analysis

Summary

In a decision of 28 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_154/2026), the President of the Court of Appeal, acting as judge-rapporteur, orders that a London law firm be given, after redaction of personal data, Sumi Agro’s request for rehearing of 5 May 2025 and Syngenta’s response of 28 July 2025 in UPC_CoA_523/2024, closed on 23 December 2025 after withdrawal. He refuses access to Exhibits SA-1 (a representative’s bank details) and SA-2 (invoices of Sumi’s representative), held to be confidential.

Provisions applied

UPC Agreement
Articles 10(1) and 45
Rules of Procedure
Rules 262.1(b) and 262.5
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)
Regulation (EU) 2016/679
Case law cited
Ocado (Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_404/2023, 10 April 2024), Abbott v Powell Gilbert (Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_480/2024 and UPC_CoA_481/2024, 9 January 2025).

Related decisions

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 1 November 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Going further

Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
English from the language of proceedings
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CoA_154/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Generic
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
Le président de la cour d’appel ouvre à un cabinet l’accès à la demande de révision de Sumi Agro et à la réponse de Syngenta, après occultation des données personnelles, mais refuse l’accès aux pièces SA-1 et SA-2, qui contiennent des informations bancaires et de facturation de représentants.
Appeal
Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance
Court of Appeal decision.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.