Opens in a new tab

Sumi Agro v Syngenta (CoA, 24 December 2025)

Date24 December 2025
CourtCoA
DivisionLuxembourg (LU)
Type of actionGeneric application
Case number(s)UPC_CoA_523/2024
Registry referenceApp_20809/2025 · UPC_CoA_523/2024
PartiesSumi Agro Limited, Sumi Agro Europe Limited v. Syngenta Limited

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

The Court of Appeal allows Sumi Agro Limited and Sumi Agro Europe Limited to withdraw their application for rehearing (Rule 245 RoP) of an order of the Court of Appeal of 3 March 2025, issued in proceedings UPC_CoA_523/2024 against Syngenta Limited (EP 2 152 073). After three stays granted for settlement discussions, the parties had filed a joint application. The Court finds that no costs decision is required and refunds 60% of the fee, namely EUR 1,500 out of EUR 2,500, but refuses the requested fee waiver. The decision clarifies the financial consequences of withdrawing an application for rehearing.

Question

Does the joint withdrawal of an application for rehearing entitle the applicant, beyond the partial refund under Rule 370.9 RoP, to a waiver or full refund of the fee?

Decision

Rule 265.1 RoP applies mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of an application for rehearing. As the application was joint, the respondent is deemed to have no legitimate interest in a decision (paragraphs 5 and 6). Since both parties waived a costs decision, none is issued (paragraph 7). As the withdrawal came before the closure of the written procedure, 60% of the fee is refunded under Rule 370.9(b)(i) RoP and the remainder of the request is dismissed (paragraph 8). The fee cannot be waived under Rule 250 in conjunction with Rule 245(2)(a) RoP, and whether there was a fundamental procedural defect can only be decided on the application for rehearing itself (paragraph 9).

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Rules of Procedure
Rules 245, 250, 265 and 370.9

Related decisions

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Decisions in the same proceedings

Going further

Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.

Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CoA_523/2024 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 19 December 2024 Sumi Agro v Syngenta (CoA, 19 December 2024) Procedural Order · UPC_CoA_523/2024

    La cour d’appel écarte l’extrait d’ouvrage produit tardivement par Sumi Agro et les contre-pièces conditionnelles de Syngenta, mais admet les pièces de Syngenta sur le produit Kagura 2024, que celle-ci ne pouvait raisonnablement produire en première instance.

  2. 19 December 2025 Docket Navigator (applicant) in Sumi Agro v Syngenta (CoA, 19 December 2025) Application RoP262.1 (b) · UPC_CoA_523/2024

    La demande d’accès de Docket Navigator est rejetée : la redistribution des pièces à des abonnés n’est pas un intérêt protégé par l’article 45 de l’Accord, et le droit d’auteur n’entre pas dans la mise en balance.

  3. 24 December 2025 Sumi Agro v Syngenta (CoA, 24 December 2025) Generic application · UPC_CoA_523/2024

What the record states

Nature of the act
Generic application
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
Le désistement conjoint de la demande en révision est autorisé sans décision sur les frais. 60 % de la taxe sont remboursés et la dispense de taxe est refusée.
Appeal
Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance
Court of Appeal decision.

Patents mentioned

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

PublicationRole in the disputeFamilyStandard and declarationPoolSources
EP 2 152 073
Herbicide compositions
recorded proprietor: Syngenta Ltd
Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified)
Also mentioned in 14 other decision(s): Gowling WLG v Sumi Agro (CoA, 24 February 2026) · Docket Navigator (applicant) in Sumi Agro v Syngenta (CoA, 19 December · Syngenta v Sumi Agro (CFI, 29 July 2025) · Sumi Agro Europe v Syngenta (CoA, 23 June 2025) · Syngenta v Sumi Agro (CFI, 14 April 2025) · Syngenta v Sumi Agro (CFI, 11 March 2025) · Sumi Agro Europe v Syngenta (CoA, 4 March 2025) · Syngenta v Sumi Agro Europe (CFI, 12 February 2025)
not recordednot recordednot recordedEspacenet · European Patent Register
existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically)
mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.