Carpmaels & Ransford v Microsoft (CoA, UPC_CoA_155/2026, 26 October 2026)
| Date | 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Generic |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CoA_155/2026 |
| Registry reference | UPC-COA-0000155/2026 |
| Parties | Carpmaels & Ransford LLP v. Microsoft Corporation; Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy |
| Language | English |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 1 November 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In a decision of 26 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_155/2026 and UPC_CoA_156/2026), the Court of Appeal largely grants a London law firm’s request for access to the pleadings and evidence in Suinno’s applications for rehearing against Microsoft (UPC_CoA_883/2025 and UPC_CoA_892/2025), after redaction of personal data. It excludes Exhibit C, which reproduces material declared confidential by the Paris Central Division on 8 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_724/2025, cost reimbursement proceedings); access to it may only be sought by an application under Rule 262.3 RoP. It recalls that a law firm may be a “member of the public” within the meaning of Rule 262.1(b) RoP.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 262.1(b), 262.2, 262.3 and 262A
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679
- Case law cited
- Ocado (Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_404/2023, 10 April 2024), Abbott v Powell Gilbert (Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_480/2024 and UPC_CoA_481/2024, 9 January 2025), Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics (Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_101/2024, 28 March 2024).
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 1 November 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Confidentiality club, UPC Court of Appeal
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- English from the language of proceedings
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
UPC_CoA_155/2026official number
UPC_CFI_724/2025Parties
- defendantSuinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy23 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantMicrosoft Corporation31 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantCarpmaels & Ransford LLP3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La cour d’appel ouvre à un cabinet l’accès aux écritures des procédures de révision Suinno c. Microsoft, après occultation des données personnelles, à l’exception de la pièce C couverte par une ordonnance de confidentialité de première instance non frappée d’appel.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal (first instance cited: UPC_CFI_724/2025).
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Carpmaels & Ransford v Syngenta (CoA, UPC_CoA_154/2026, 28 October 2026) cites this decision
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.