Decisions analysed
Find a decision of the Unified Patent Court, consult its official source and identify the firm’s case notes to understand its practical implications.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
2,390 decisions recorded
Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 14 August 2026)
In an order of 14 August 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division rules, in the infringement action on EP 3 107 487 (UPC_CFI_1357/2025) and the joined counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_629/2026), on the defendants’ Rule 9 objection to Establishment Labs S.A.’s…
Read the analysisSibio v Abbott Diabetes Care (CoA, 14 August 2026)
In a decision of 14 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_884/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal dismissed Sibio Technology Limited's appeal against the Paris Central Division decision rejecting its revocation action against Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.'s EP 3 831 283, which concerns an on-body glucose…
Read the analysisbiolitec Holding v Light Guide Optics Germany (CFI, UPC_CFI_256/2025, 13 August 2026)
In an order of 13 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_256/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division designates as confidential, under Art. 58 UPCA and Rule 262.2 RoP, the passages of the cost-fixing submissions concerning hourly rates, billing and time spent by the parties'…
Read the analysisbiolitec Holding v Light Guide Optics Germany (CFI, UPC_CFI_256/2025, 13 August 2026, doc. 2)
By order of 13 August 2026, issued in German (UPC_CFI_256/2025), the presiding judge, acting as judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, set the value of the provisional measures proceedings UPC_CFI_486/2024 at EUR 1,000,000 and stayed the cost-fixing proceedings brought by Light Guide…
Read the analysisBTL Medizintechnik v Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems (CFI, 13 August 2026)
In an order of 13 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_1048/2025), the Hague Local Division declares inadmissible BTL Medizintechnik GmbH's request for reimbursement of 60% of the court fees following withdrawal of its infringement action against Lexter Microelectronic Engineering Systems S.L.
Read the analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 12 August 2026)
In an order of 11 August 2026 under Rule 105.5 RoP following the interim conference (UPC_CFI_1160/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division organises the damages proceedings brought by Edwards Lifesciences Corporation against Meril GmbH, Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CoA, 11 August 2026)
By order of 11 August 2026, the Court of Appeal allows Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) and three group companies to withdraw their appeal (UPC_CoA_91/2026) against the Lisbon Local Division’s order of 26 May 2026 dismissing their application under Rules 360 and 361,…
Read the analysisBF exaQC v Google (CFI, 11 August 2026)
In an order of 11 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_2082/2026), the President of the Court of First Instance grants the application of Google LLC and Google Germany GmbH and changes the language of the infringement proceedings brought by BF exaQC AG and ParTec AG…
Read the analysisSamsung Electronics Benelux v Maxell (CFI, 10 August 2026)
By decision of 10 August 2026, given in the infringement action (UPC_CFI_251/2025) and the joined counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_769/2025), The Hague Local Division revokes Maxell, Ltd.’s EP 2 061 230 in its entirety and accordingly dismisses the action against four Samsung companies,…
Read the analysisWilus Institute of Standards v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_452/2025, 10 August 2026)
In a decision of 10 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_452/2025, counterclaims UPC_CFI_1152/2025 and UPC_CFI_752/2026, EP 3 849 157), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permits the withdrawal by Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology and the ASUS companies under Rule 265 RoP and…
Read the analysisCYBEX v NUNA International (CFI, 10 August 2026)
In an order of 10 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_1321/2026), the Hamburg Local Division rules on CYBEX GmbH's application for provisional measures against NUNA International B.V.
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, 10 August 2026)
By order of 10 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_619/2025, UPC_CFI_1526/2025 and UPC_CFI_2033/2025), The Hague Local Division deals, in the dispute between GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and thirteen Moderna group companies, with the consequences of EPO decisions on two divisional patents stemming from the same application.
Read the analysisWilus Institute of Standards v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_752/2026, 10 August 2026)
Read the French analysisMaxell v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 10 August 2026)
Read the French analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. (CFI, 10 August 2026)
By order of 10 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_621/2025, UPC_CFI_1707/2025 and UPC_CFI_1708/2025), The Hague Local Division deals, in the dispute between GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and companies of the Pfizer and BioNTech groups, with the consequences of EPO decisions on two divisional patents stemming from…
Read the analysisWilus Institute of Standards v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_1152/2025, 10 August 2026)
Read the French analysisNiche Biomedical v Onward Medical (CFI, 6 August 2026)
In a decision of 6 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_1569/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division fixes the costs recoverable by Niche Biomedical, Inc. (ANEUVO) from ONWARD Medical N.V.
Read the analysisCA v Deutsche Telekom (CFI, 6 August 2026)
In a decision of 29 July 2026, given in infringement action UPC_CFI_515/2026 and counterclaim UPC_CFI_1797/2026 (EP 1 955 151), the panel of the Munich Local Division rejects CA, Inc.'s application for review (Rule 333.1 RoP) of the judge-rapporteur's confidentiality order of 22…
Read the analysisVectis IP v CPYou (CoA, UPC_CoA_118/2026, 5 August 2026)
By order of 5 August 2026, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_118/2026, UPC_CoA_119/2026 and UPC_CoA_120/2026, the Court of Appeal rejects the requests of Dolby International AB and Vectis IP Ltd.
Read the analysisVectis IP v CPYou (CoA, UPC_CoA_120/2026, 5 August 2026)
Read the French analysisVectis IP v CPYou (CoA, UPC_CoA_119/2026, 5 August 2026)
Read the French analysisQIAGEN Sciences v bioMérieux (CFI, 5 August 2026)
In a decision of 5 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_181/2025, counterclaims UPC_CFI_497/2025 and UPC_CFI_516/2025, EP 2 726 883), the Düsseldorf Local Division, following a settlement, allows the withdrawals by QIAGEN Sciences, LLC and by bioMérieux S.A.
Read the analysisAcademy of Military Medical Sciences v Gilead Sciences (CoA, 4 August 2026)
In an order of 4 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_121/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal grants the Academy of Military Medical Sciences leave to appeal the Milan Central Division's order of 10 July 2026, which had ordered it to pay Gilead…
Read the analysisOTEC Präzisionsfinish v ANCA Europe (CFI, 4 August 2026)
In a decision of 4 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_1536/2026), the Düsseldorf Local Division, on the parties' joint request and under Rule 365.1 RoP, confirms the settlement reached between OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH and ANCA Europe GmbH after the order for inspection and preservation of…
Read the analysisVeridium IP v T3K-Forensics (CFI, 4 August 2026)
By an order of 4 August 2026, published on the register on 13 October 2026, the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered, without hearing the defendants, the inspection and preservation of evidence concerning the BioCapture SDK and the T3K BioCapture application, at the request…
Read the analysisNera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 3 August 2026)
Read the French analysisKodak v Fujifilm (CoA, 3 August 2026)
By order of 3 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_28/2026), the Court of Appeal sets aside the Mannheim Local Division’s orders of 20 and 30 January 2026, which had ordered three Kodak companies jointly to pay penalties of EUR 1,720,000 for failing to comply with…
Read the analysisXiaomi v Nera Innovations (CoA, 3 August 2026)
By order of 3 August 2026, given in German in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_692/2025 and UPC_CoA_854/2025, the Court of Appeal allows Nera Innovations Ltd and four Xiaomi companies to withdraw their appeals against the Hamburg Local Division’s decision of 10 July 2025…
Read the analysisJulius Blum v ARTURO SALICE (CFI, 3 August 2026)
Read the French analysisBostik v Henkel France (CFI, 31 July 2026)
In a decision of 31 July 2026, the Paris Local Division revokes in its entirety Bostik's European patent EP 1 725 627 (cohesive coating for snack food packaging), which had already expired, for added matter, and consequently dismisses the infringement action brought…
Read the analysisRobert Bosch v OWIM (CFI, UPC_CFI_565/2025, 31 July 2026)
In a decision of 31 July 2026, published on 3 November 2026 (UPC_CFI_565/2025 and UPC_CFI_841/2025), the Mannheim Local Division largely upholds Robert Bosch’s action against OWIM, maker of the Parkside brand, and three companies of the Lidl group.
Read the analysisBiopsafe v Kaltek (CFI, 30 July 2026)
In an order of 30 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_2216/2025 and UPC_CFI_1829/2026), the Milan Local Division dismisses the application for security for costs filed by Kaltek s.r.l.
Read the analysisSun Patent Trust v Vivo Mobile Communication (CFI, UPC_CFI_362/2025, 30 July 2026)
By order of 30 July 2026 under Rule 105.5 RoP, following the interim conference held online the day before, the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo companies based on EP 3 407 524…
Read the analysisQord IP Protection v SmartThings (CFI, 30 July 2026)
By order of 30 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division recorded the parties' agreement in Qord IP Protection's infringement action concerning EP 2 047 617: SmartThings appears voluntarily, and the time limit for the Statement of Defence (Rule 23)…
Read the analysisSun Patent Trust v Vivo Mobile Communication (CFI, UPC_CFI_361/2025, 30 July 2026)
In an order of 30 July 2026 issued after the interim conference held by video link on 29 July 2026 (Rule 105.5 RoP), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division sets the value of Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo…
Read the analysisMerz Pharma France v Viatris Santé (CFI, 30 July 2026)
By order of 30 July 2026, the Paris Local Division dismissed Viatris Santé's preliminary objection in the infringement action brought by three Merz companies on the basis of French supplementary protection certificate No.
Read the analysisPrinoth v Xelom (CFI, 29 July 2026)
Open the entryKEEEX v ADOBE (CFI, 29 July 2026)
In an order of 29 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_530/2025), the Paris Local Division, sitting as a full panel, dismisses the applications for review (Rule 333 RoP) filed by KEEEX and by Adobe against the judge-rapporteur's order of 25 June 2026, in the action…
Read the analysisCardo Systems v Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin (CFI, 29 July 2026)
Read the French analysisTELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, 29 July 2026)
By decision of 29 July 2026, the Lisbon Local Division confirmed, at Ericsson's sole request, the costs agreement reached with ASUSTek in the infringement action concerning EP 2 819 131, and ordered ASUSTek to pay EUR 150,000.
Read the analysisBeko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_78/2026, 28 July 2026)
Read the French analysisPrimetals Austria v Danieli & C (CFI, 28 July 2026)
In an order of 28 July 2026 made of the court's own motion (UPC_CFI_377/2025 and UPC_CFI_702/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division corrects a clerical mistake in his order of 22 July 2026, issued after the interim conference, in the dispute…
Read the analysisDolby International v Optoma Deutschland (CFI, 28 July 2026)
In an order of 27 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_226/2024, App_57167/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division grants a lawyer, as a member of the public, access to the statement of claim and part of the exhibits in Dolby International's action against three…
Read the analysisBeko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_77/2026, 28 July 2026)
By order of 28 July 2026, issued in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_77/2026 and UPC_CoA_78/2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal stayed the appeals against the Düsseldorf Local Division's order of 18 March 2026 (EP 3 605 534), at the request of…
Read the analysisASTES4 v BYSTRONIC LASER (CFI, 28 July 2026)
Read the French analysisCJ CheilJedang v Eppen Netherlands (CFI, 28 July 2026)
In a procedural order of 28 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_1540/2026), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division extends, for all defendants (Eppen Netherlands, three Eppen companies based in China and Oostvogels Logistics), the deadline for the statement of defence to six weeks after…
Read the analysisPirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 28 July 2026)
By an order lodged on 28 July 2026 and published on the register on 14 October 2026, the Milan Local Division stayed proceedings UPC_CFI_2297/2026 and UPC_CFI_2300/2026 between Pirelli Tyre and Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber, following a worldwide settlement reported by the parties.
Read the analysisReinhausen v Shanghai Huaming Power Equipment (CFI, UPC_CFI_1747/2026, 27 July 2026)
By order of 27 July 2026, given in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_1746/2026 and UPC_CFI_1747/2026, panel 2 of the Munich Local Division ruled on the request for review (Rule 197.3 RoP) filed by Shanghai Huaming Power Equipment against the inspection and preservation order…
Read the analysisWEPA NEDERLAND v ESSITY HYGIENE AND HEALTH AKTIEBOLAG (CoA, 27 July 2026)
In a case management order of 27 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_113/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal instructs the Registry to reimburse EUR 9,600 to WEPA Nederland, which had paid EUR 14,600 in fees for its appeal against the order of The…
Read the analysisReinhausen v Shanghai Huaming Power Equipment (CFI, UPC_CFI_1751/2026, 27 July 2026)
By order of 27 July 2026, issued in German in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_1751/2026 and UPC_CFI_1752/2026, the Munich Local Division, ruling on a request for review under Rule 197.3 RoP, supplemented the confidentiality provisions of an inspection and preservation of evidence order…
Read the analysisReinhausen v Shanghai Huaming Power Equipment (CFI, UPC_CFI_1746/2026, 27 July 2026)
In an order of 27 July 2026 given in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_1746/2026 and UPC_CFI_1747/2026, the Munich Local Division, on an application for review (Rule 197.3 RoP), supplements the inspection and preservation of evidence order it had made without hearing the other…
Read the analysisDolby International v Beko Germany (CFI, 27 July 2026)
By order of 27 July 2026, issued in cases UPC_CFI_1923/2025 and UPC_CFI_1062/2026, the Düsseldorf Local Division stayed with immediate effect Dolby International's infringement action against Beko Germany and Arçelik (EP 3 079 153), together with the counterclaim for revocation.
Read the analysisSYPOX v Topsoe (CFI, 27 July 2026)
In a procedural order of 27 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_894/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Central Division takes note of SYPOX's withdrawal of the unredacted version of an investment agreement (exhibit D36), filed to show its SME status in the action for revocation…
Read the analysisReinhausen v Shanghai Huaming Power Equipment (CFI, UPC_CFI_1752/2026, 27 July 2026)
Read the French analysisVereenigde Octrooibureaux v Dolby International (CFI, 24 July 2026)
In an order of 24 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_226/2024, App_11638/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division grants the firm Vereenigde Octrooibureaux, as a member of the public, limited access to the statement of claim in Dolby International's action against three Optoma companies…
Read the analysisInterDigital VC Holdings v The Walt Disney Company (CFI, 24 July 2026)
In a decision of 23 July 2026, given in the joined cases UPC_CFI_87/2025 and UPC_CFI_488/2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division held that eleven Disney group companies infringe, through the Disney+ service, claims 5 and 17 of InterDigital VC Holdings’ EP 2 449 782…
Read the analysisALD France v Nanoval (CFI, 23 July 2026)
In a decision of 23 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_999/2025), the Paris Central Division allows the withdrawal of ALD France's action for revocation of Nanoval's patent EP 3 083 107, declares the case closed and grants the claimant a refund of only 50% of…
Read the analysisTer Meer Steinmeister & Partner Patentanwälte mbB v 2seventy bio (CFI, 23 July 2026)
Read the French analysisFranz Kaldewei v Bette (CFI, 23 July 2026)
In an order of 23 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_7/2023, App_44641/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division grants a law firm, as a member of the public, access to the pleadings and evidence of the action for infringement of EP 3 375 337…
Read the analysisAdvanced Brain Monitoring v Koninklijke Philips (CoA, 22 July 2026)
By order of 22 July 2026, issued in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_63/2026 and UPC_CoA_64/2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal declined to rule in advance on the admissibility of eleven new auxiliary requests filed by Advanced Brain Monitoring with its statement…
Read the analysisPrimetals Austria v Danieli & C (CFI, 22 July 2026)
In an order of 22 July 2026 issued after the interim conference of 9 July 2026 (Rule 105.5 RoP), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division organises the next steps in Primetals Technologies Austria's infringement action against Danieli & C.
Read the analysisAdvanced Brain Monitoring v Respironics Deutschland (CoA, 22 July 2026)
Read the French analysisRaimund Beck Nageltechnik v BAUSSMANN Collated Fasteners (CFI, 21 July 2026)
In a decision of 21 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_714/2025), the Munich Central Division partially revokes BAUSSMANN Collated Fasteners' European patent with unitary effect EP 4 283 140, relating to a wooden fastening element, on the revocation action of Raimund Beck Nageltechnik: claim 1…
Read the analysisOXFORD NANOPORE v MGI TECH (CFI, 20 July 2026)
In an order of 17 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_2307/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division rejected MGI TECH GmbH's (Respondent 1) application to extend to 31 July 2026, or at least to 27 July, the deadline of 24 July for its objection…
Read the analysisLiNA Medical v Tonglu Qianyan Medtech (CFI, 20 July 2026)
In an order of 20 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_209/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division held that the steps already taken to bring LiNA Medical's statement of claim to the attention of Defendants 1 and 2, domiciled in China, constitute good service…
Read the analysisKEEEX v ADOBE (CFI, 20 July 2026)
In an order of 20 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_530/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division partly granted Adobe's request to increase the EUR 200,000 security imposed on KEEEX under Rule 158 RoP on 19 December 2025: the security is increased by EUR…
Read the analysisVALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH DOO Beograd (CFI, 18 July 2026)
By order of 18 July 2026, issued in infringement action UPC_CFI_1963/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_1247/2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division refused to let the Bosch group companies' time limit for their rejoinder run only from receipt of an unredacted…
Read the analysisFives ECL v REEL (CoA, 17 July 2026)
In an order of 16 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_42/2026), in Fives ECL's appeal against the Hamburg decision of 11 February 2026 on its damages claim (EP 1 740 740), the Court of Appeal ruled on confidentiality and language.
Read the analysisFUJIFILM v Kodak (CoA, 17 July 2026)
By order of 17 July 2026, the Court of Appeal set aside the costs ruling of the Paris Central Division of 14 July 2025 and ordered Kodak, S.A. to bear the costs at both instances of the revocation action it had brought…
Read the analysisSiemens Healthcare v Hologic (CoA, 17 July 2026)
In a decision of 17 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_94/2026), the Court of Appeal permitted Siemens Healthineers and its affiliates to withdraw an application for suspensive effect lodged by mistake in the appeal file concerning the counterclaim for revocation, the intended application having then…
Read the analysisLionra v Cisco Systems (CoA, 17 July 2026)
In a decision of 17 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_360/2025), the Court of Appeal, following a settlement, permitted Lionra to withdraw its appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's decision of 19 February 2025 (EP 2 201 740), held that Cisco's cross-appeal is deemed withdrawn…
Read the analysisFraunhofer-Gesellschaft v Acer Computer (CFI, 16 July 2026)
Read the French analysisEmboline v AorticLab (CoA, 16 July 2026)
In an order of 16 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_40/2026, EP 2 129 425), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal clarified how a counterclaim for revocation made conditional on a finding of infringement operates.
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion (CoA, UPC_CoA_101/2026, 16 July 2026)
Read the French analysisApplicant v Registrar (CoA, 16 July 2026)
In an order of 16 July 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal rejected an anonymised applicant's petition for review of the Registrar's decision of 26 January 2026 refusing to confirm his registration on the list of representatives entitled under Art.
Read the analysisImusyn v BAG Diagnostics (CFI, 16 July 2026)
In a procedural order of 16 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_701/2025, EP 3 548 898), the Düsseldorf Local Division, at BAG Diagnostics' request and with no objection from Imusyn, classified as confidential the settlement reached between the parties in the preliminary injunction proceedings UPC_CFI_550/2025…
Read the analysisPIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 16 July 2026)
In an order of 16 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_770/2024 and UPC_CFI_556/2025), the Milan Local Division, at Pirelli Tyre's request and with no observations from Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber, rectified its decision of 26 May 2026 concerning EP 3 519 207.
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 16 July 2026)
In an order of 16 July 2026, made by the standing judge of the Court of Appeal in UPC_CoA_100/2026, UPC_CoA_101/2026 and UPC_CoA_102/2026, Shenzhen Transsion was permitted, with Ericsson's consent and following a settlement, to withdraw its appeals against the Hague Local Division's…
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion (CoA, UPC_CoA_102/2026, 16 July 2026)
Read the French analysisApplicant v Registrar (CoA, 16 July 2026, doc. 2)
By order of 16 July 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal dismissed a petition by a European patent attorney, whose identity is not published, against the Registrar's decision of 26 January 2026 refusing to enter him on the list of…
Read the analysisAIM Sport Development v TGI Sport Suomi (CoA, 16 July 2026)
In an order of 16 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that naming TGI Sport Virtual UK Limited in AIM Sport Development AG's statement of appeal against the Helsinki Local Division's order of 29 April 2026 on provisional…
Read the analysisVALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH DOO Beograd (CFI, 15 July 2026)
In an order of 15 July 2026 (proceedings UPC_CFI_1963/2025 and UPC_CFI_1247/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division allowed VALEO SYSTEMES D'ESSUYAGE, over the Bosch companies' objections, to limit its infringement action on EP 4 144 599 (excluding seven APX products, Belgium…
Read the analysisBoa v FLA Europe (CFI, UPC_CFI_998/2025, 15 July 2026)
By order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_998/2025, UPC_CFI_738/2026 and UPC_CFI_743/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division regularised Boa Technologies' pleadings (reply, application to amend EP 3 777 595 and defence to the counterclaim) filed on 4 May 2026 without an electronic…
Read the analysisNetwork System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_71/2026, 15 July 2026)
Read the French analysisCA v Deutsche Telekom (CFI, 15 July 2026)
In a procedural order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_672/2026 and UPC_CFI_2175/2026, EP 1 934 794), the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the confidentiality request filed by Deutsche Telekom and two group companies with their statement of defence, in the action brought by…
Read the analysisQualcomm v Network System (CoA, 15 July 2026)
Read the French analysisBrita v Ningbo Blue Pluser Appliance (CFI, 15 July 2026)
Read the French analysisNetwork System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_70/2026, 15 July 2026)
Read the French analysisSiemens Healthineers v Hologic (CoA, 15 July 2026)
In an order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_93/2026, EP 2 352 431), the Court of Appeal rejected the application by Siemens Healthineers and its affiliates for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 10 June 2026, which…
Read the analysisfiskaly v SwissBit (CFI, 15 July 2026)
Read the French analysisNetwork System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_72/2026, 15 July 2026)
Read the French analysisAmazon.com v InterDigital VC Holdings (CoA, 15 July 2026)
In an order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_936/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted InterDigital, with Amazon's consent, to withdraw its application for provisional measures and declared closed Amazon's appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's order of 22 December 2025, which had rejected…
Read the analysisBoa v FLA Europe (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 15 July 2026)
In a procedural order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_996/2025, together with files UPC_CFI_737/2026 and UPC_CFI_742/2026, EP 3 003 087), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division regularised the reply, application to amend the patent and defence to the counterclaim for revocation that…
Read the analysisNetwork System Technologies v Qualcomm (CoA, 15 July 2026)
In an order of 15 July 2026 common to the five appeals UPC_CoA_68/2026 to UPC_CoA_72/2026 against the Munich Local Division's decisions of 11 March 2026 in the dispute between Network System Technologies LLC (NST) and Qualcomm, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of…
Read the analysisXingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 14 July 2026)
In an order of 14 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_76/2026, EP 2 791 402), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal extended until service of the appeal decision the suspensive effect granted on 26 May 2026 to Xingi Technology and Jiangsu Jiuzhou Xingji against…
Read the analysisTridonic v Inventronics (CFI, 14 July 2026)
In a decision of 14 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_580/2025, EP 2 011 218), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with Inventronics' consent, permitted Tridonic to withdraw its infringement action, stayed since August 2025 for settlement talks, and declared the proceedings closed.
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, 14 July 2026)
In a decision of 14 July 2026, the Lisbon Local Division allowed Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co. Ltd. to withdraw its infringement action on EP 4 123 910 (UPC_CFI_850/2026), before any statement of defence and with the Ericsson companies' consent, and declared the…
Read the analysisFujifilm v Kodak (CoA, UPC_CoA_474/2025, 13 July 2026)
In a decision of 13 July 2026, the Court of Appeal ruled on joined appeals UPC_CoA_473/2025 and UPC_CoA_474/2025 (German designation) and UPC_CoA_873/2025 and UPC_CoA_881/2025 (UK designation) in the dispute between Fujifilm Corporation and the Kodak companies over EP 3 476 616 (lithographic…
Read the analysis