Shenzhen Transsion v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 16 July 2026)

Date	16 July 2026
Court	CoA
Division	Luxembourg (LU)
Type of action	Appeal
Case number(s)	UPC_CoA_100/2026
Registry reference	UPC-COA-0000100/2026
Parties	Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co. Ltd., Tecno Mobile Limited , Itel Mobile Limited , Infinix Mobility Limited , Tekpoint GmbH , IRD Distribuc…

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

2 July 2026 : Shenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 2 July 2026) UPC-COA-0000100/2026

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CoA_100/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantShenzhen Transsion Holdings Co. Ltd.14 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantTecno Mobile Limited10 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantItel Mobile Limited9 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantInfinix Mobility Limited7 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantTekpoint GmbH6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantIRD Distribuc2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

2 July 2026 Shenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 2 July 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_100/2026
Le juge de permanence considère que l’autorisation d’appel accordée après le délai de quinze jours est sans effet et invite les parties à s’expliquer sur une requalification en demande de révision discrétionnaire.
16 July 2026 Shenzhen Transsion v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 16 July 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_100/2026

What the record states

Nature of the act: Appeal
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): Le retrait des trois appels est autorisé avec l'accord d'Ericsson, sans décision sur les frais, et 50 % des taxes d'appel, soit 2 000 euros, sont remboursés.
Appeal: Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance: Court of Appeal decision.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Shenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CoA, 2 July 2026) cited in this record
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 27 May 2026) cited in this record
Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CoA, 15 January 2025) cited in this record
Shenzhen Transsion (CoA, UPC_CoA_101/2026, 16 July 2026) cites this decision
Shenzhen Transsion (CoA, UPC_CoA_102/2026, 16 July 2026) cites this decision

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.