Primetals Austria v Danieli & C (CFI, 28 July 2026)

Date	28 July 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Milan (IT) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_377/2025
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_377/2025
Parties	Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH v. Danieli & C. S.P.A.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

8 January 2026 : Primetals Technologies Austria v Danieli & C. (CFI, 8 January 2026) UPC_CFI_377/2025 · UPC_CFI_702/2025
22 July 2026 : Primetals Austria v Danieli & C (CFI, 22 July 2026) UPC_CFI_377/2025

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_377/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantPrimetals Technologies Austria GmbH3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantDanieli & C. S.P.A2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

8 January 2026 Primetals Technologies Austria v Danieli & C. (CFI, 8 January 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_377/2025
La demande de production de pièces est rejetée comme irrecevable et, en tout état de cause, mal fondée : elle reprend une demande antérieure de conservation des preuves et ne repose pas sur des éléments raisonnablement disponibles suffisants.
22 July 2026 Primetals Austria v Danieli & C (CFI, 22 July 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_377/2025
La décomposition de la revendication proposée par la défenderesse est retenue, la titulaire doit réduire ses requêtes subsidiaires à cinq et la demande d'écritures supplémentaires sur l'équivalence est rejetée.
28 July 2026 Primetals Austria v Danieli & C (CFI, 28 July 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_377/2025

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): L'ordonnance du 22 juillet 2026 est rectifiée : la valeur de la demande reconventionnelle en nullité est fixée à 1 875 000 euros au lieu de 1 850 000 euros.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Primetals Austria v Danieli & C (CFI, 22 July 2026) cited in this record
Primetals Technologies Austria v Danieli & C. (CFI, 8 January 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.