Opens in a new tab

Xiaomi v Nera Innovations (CoA, 3 August 2026)

Date3 August 2026
CourtCoA
DivisionLuxembourg (LU)
Type of actionAppeal
Case number(s)UPC_CoA_854/2025
Registry referenceUPC_CoA_854/2025
PartiesXiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V. v. Nera Innovations Ltd.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CoA_854/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Appeal
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
La cour d’appel autorise le désistement des deux appels à la suite d’une transaction, déclare la procédure close et ne statue pas sur les frais.
Appeal
Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance
Court of Appeal decision.

Patents mentioned

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

PublicationRole in the disputeFamilyStandard and declarationPoolSources
EP 2 642 632Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified)
Also mentioned in 6 other decision(s): Nera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CFI, 10 July 2025) · Nera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 30 June 2026) · Nera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CFI, 28 April 2025) · Nera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CFI, 30 December 2024) · Nera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 6 August 2024) · Nera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 4 June 2024)
not recordednot recordednot recordedEspacenet
links not checked
mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.