Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 14 July 2026)
| Date | 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Appeal |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CoA_76/2026 |
| Registry reference | UPC-COA-0000076/2026 |
| Parties | Xingi Technology Co., Ltd, Jiangsu Xingi High Performance Fiber Products Co., Ltd v. Avient Protective Materials B.V. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 27 August 2026 : Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 27 August 2026) UPC-COA-0000076/2026
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In an order of 14 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_76/2026, EP 2 791 402), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal extended until service of the appeal decision the suspensive effect granted on 26 May 2026 to Xingi Technology and Jiangsu Jiuzhou Xingji against the Hague Local Division’s order of 11 May 2026, which required them under Rule 190 RoP to produce samples of UD fabric and English versions of an introduction video. As the Chinese export authorisation sought by the appellants is still pending, the status quo is maintained. The order shows how a foreign-law constraint can extend the suspension of a production order.
Question
Can suspensive effect granted because of a foreign export authorisation procedure be extended where that procedure is not completed by the deadline set?
Decision
The application is admissible, since it relies on circumstances arising after the order of 26 May 2026 and seeks to modify the compliance deadline (paragraph 7). That order had accepted, prima facie, that the Chinese export-control regime applied and that immediate enforcement risked rendering the appeal largely ineffective, while requiring the appellants to act with due diligence, any unjustified delay being attributed to them (paragraphs 8 and 9). The authorisation procedure is still pending, so that basis remains, the Court making no finding on why it has taken so long (paragraph 10). With the hearing scheduled and a decision expected soon, suspensive effect is extended until service of that decision, and the alternative requests need not be decided (paragraphs 11 and 12).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: a party relying on a foreign export constraint should document the status of the administrative procedure and its own diligence in order to obtain an extension of suspensive effect (paragraphs 9 and 10).
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 190 and 223
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.
Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantXingi Technology Co., Ltd.3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantJiangsu Xingi High Performance Fiber Products Co., Ltd.2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantAvient Protective Materials B.V.5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 14 July 2026 Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 14 July 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_76/2026
- 27 August 2026 Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 27 August 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_76/2026
La cour d'appel confirme l'ordonnance de production d'échantillons et d'une vidéo rendue au titre de la règle 190 et déclare irrecevable l'appel incident conditionnel d'Avient.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Appeal
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- L'effet suspensif accordé le 26 mai 2026 est prolongé jusqu'à la signification de l'arrêt d'appel, l'autorisation d'exportation chinoise étant toujours pendante.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 791 402mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 27 August 2026) cited in this record
- Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 26 May 2026) cited in this record
- Avient Protective Materials v Xingi (CFI, 11 May 2026) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 791 402 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 5 other decision(s): Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 27 August 2026) · Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 26 May 2026) · Avient Protective Materials v Xingi (CFI, 11 May 2026) · Avient Protective Materials v Xinji (CFI, 24 October 2025) · Avient Protective Materials v Xingi Technology (CFI, UPC_CFI_478/2025, | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.