Beko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_77/2026, 28 July 2026)
| Date | 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Appeal |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CoA_77/2026 |
| Registry reference | UPC-COA-0000077/2026 |
| Parties | Beko Germany GmbH, Arçelik A.Ş, Elektronik Plant v. Dolby International AB |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 9 October 2026 : Beko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_77/2026, 9 October 2026) UPC-COA-0000077/2026
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- defendantDolby International AB35 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantBeko Germany GmbH5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantArçelik A.Ş5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantElektronik Plant4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 28 July 2026 Beko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_77/2026, 28 July 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_77/2026
- 9 October 2026 Beko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_77/2026, 9 October 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_77/2026 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
La cour d'appel autorise les désistements de l'action en contrefaçon et de la demande reconventionnelle, clôt la procédure sans décision sur les frais et ordonne le remboursement de 50 % des frais de justice de chaque appel.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Appeal
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La cour d'appel suspend les appels UPC_CoA_77/2026 et UPC_CoA_78/2026 à la demande conjointe des parties, qui ont transigé.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 605 534mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Beko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_78/2026, 28 July 2026) cites this decision
- Beko Germany v Dolby International (CoA, UPC_CoA_77/2026, 9 October 2026) cites this decision
Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 605 534Audio decoding with selective post-filtering recorded proprietor: Dolby International AB | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 11 other decision(s): Dolby International v Beko Germany (CFI, 18 March 2026) · Dolby International v Optoma Deutschland (CFI, 28 July 2026) · Vereenigde Octrooibureaux v Dolby International (CFI, 24 July 2026) · Dolby International v Beko Germany (CFI, 14 October 2025) · Dolby International v Beko Germany (CFI, 15 September 2025) · Dolby International v Beko Germany (CFI, 14 August 2025) · Dolby International v Epson France (CFI, 27 May 2025) · Dolby International v Beko Germany (CFI, 9 April 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.