Prinoth v Xelom (CFI, 29 July 2026)
| Date | 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Milan (IT) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_703/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_703/2025 |
| Parties | Prinoth S.p.A. v. Xelom s.r.l. |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 16 April 2026 : Prinoth v Xelom (CFI, 16 April 2026) UPC_CFI_703/2025
- 28 September 2026 : Prinoth v Xelom (CFI, UPC_CFI_703/2025, 28 September 2026) UPC_CFI_703/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantPrinoth S.p.A.3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantXelom s.r.l5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 16 April 2026 Prinoth v Xelom (CFI, 16 April 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_703/2025
Le juge rapporteur accorde à Prinoth une prorogation de trente jours, jusqu'au 27 mai 2026, du délai de dépôt de son mémoire, la duplique de Xelom ayant introduit de nombreux moyens nouveaux.
- 29 July 2026 Prinoth v Xelom (CFI, 29 July 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_703/2025
- 28 September 2026 Prinoth v Xelom (CFI, UPC_CFI_703/2025, 28 September 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_703/2025
La juge-rapporteure de la division locale de Milan écarte la note technique rédigée pour l’occasion par Xelom et ordonne que l’expert désigné par la Cour examine directement le logiciel de la machine saisie.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Prinoth v Xelom (CFI, 16 April 2026) cited in this record
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.