PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 16 July 2026)

Date	16 July 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Milan (IT) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_770/2024
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_770/2024
Parties	PIRELLI TYRE S.P.A. v. Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., Ltd., CHINA COUNCIL FOR THE PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, AUTOMOTIVE SUB-COUNCIL

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

13 February 2026 : Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 13 February 2026) UPC_CFI_770/2024 · UPC_CFI_556/2025

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_770/2024 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantPIRELLI TYRE S.P.A7 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantSichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., Ltd.6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantCHINA COUNCIL FOR THE PROMOTION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADEFollow this party
defendantAUTOMOTIVE SUB-COUNCILnormalised name: Automotive Sub-council2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

13 February 2026 Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 13 February 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_770/2024
Le juge rapporteur ordonne le dépôt au greffe des échantillons de pneumatiques saisis et leur examen contradictoire, découpe comprise, à l'audience du 14 avril 2026, sans trancher les objections sur les photographies.
16 July 2026 PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 16 July 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_770/2024

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La décision du 26 mai 2026 est rectifiée par la suppression de la phrase mentionnant une dérogation (opt-out) de Pirelli, qui n'a jamais été déposée.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 3 519 207 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_770/2024, 26 May 2026) cited in this record
Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 19 March 2026) cited in this record
Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 13 February 2026) cited in this record
Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 28 July 2026) cites this decision

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 3 519 207`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 3 other decision(s): PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_770/2024, 26 May · Pirelli Tyre v SICHUAN YUANXING RUBBER (CFI, 5 November 2024) · Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 14 July 2025)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.