Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 13 February 2026)
| Date | 13 February 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Milan (IT) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_770/2024;UPC_CFI_556/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_770/2024 · UPC_CFI_556/2025 |
| Parties | Pirelli Tyre s.p.a. v. Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., ltd. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 16 July 2026 : PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 16 July 2026) UPC_CFI_770/2024
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In an order of 13 February 2026, made in the infringement action (UPC_CFI_770/2024) and the revocation counterclaim (UPC_CFI_556/2025) between Pirelli Tyre s.p.a. and Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., ltd., the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division recorded the outcome of the interim conference. He ordered that the tyre samples seized on 6 November 2024 be lodged with the sub-registry and examined inter partes at the oral hearing, including by cutting them open. The order shows how the interim conference can organise the taking of physical evidence ahead of the hearing.
Question
Should seized samples, which the defendant says it has never been able to inspect, be examined inter partes, and if so how, where the defendant also challenges the admissibility of photographs filed by the claimant and their correspondence with those samples?
Decision
The judge-rapporteur left the defendant’s maintained objections on the photographs undecided. After the technically qualified judge explained that a full examination requires cutting the tyre open to view its radial carcass, he found the examination necessary and in any event advisable. The custodian must lodge the seizure report and all seized specimens with the Milan sub-registry by 30 March 2026, and the examination will take place at the oral hearing of 14 April 2026 before the panel. The value of each action was kept at EUR 500,000, subject to review after the hearing.
Key points for practice
- A party that has had no access to seized samples can obtain, through the interim conference (Rule 105.5), their inter partes examination at the oral hearing, including the physical operations required.
- Practical point: technical input from the technically qualified judge at the interim conference can shape how evidence is taken, parties should check in advance that the examination is feasible in the courtroom.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 105.5 and 106
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Patent infringement action.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantPirelli Tyre s.p.a7 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantSichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., ltd6 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 13 February 2026 Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 13 February 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_770/2024, UPC_CFI_556/2025
- 26 May 2026 PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_556/2025, 26 May 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_556/2025
- 16 July 2026 PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 16 July 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_770/2024
La décision du 26 mai 2026 est rectifiée par la suppression de la phrase mentionnant une dérogation (opt-out) de Pirelli, qui n'a jamais été déposée.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le juge rapporteur ordonne le dépôt au greffe des échantillons de pneumatiques saisis et leur examen contradictoire, découpe comprise, à l'audience du 14 avril 2026, sans trancher les objections sur les photographies.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 16 July 2026) cited in this record
- PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_556/2025, 26 May 2026) cited in this record
- PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_770/2024, 26 May 2026) cited in this record
- Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 19 March 2026) cited in this record
- Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 28 July 2026) cites this decision
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.