Opens in a new tab

Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 13 February 2026)

Date13 February 2026
CourtCFI
DivisionMilan (IT) Local Division
Type of actionInfringement Action
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_770/2024;UPC_CFI_556/2025
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_770/2024 · UPC_CFI_556/2025
PartiesPirelli Tyre s.p.a. v. Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., ltd.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

In an order of 13 February 2026, made in the infringement action (UPC_CFI_770/2024) and the revocation counterclaim (UPC_CFI_556/2025) between Pirelli Tyre s.p.a. and Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber Co., ltd., the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division recorded the outcome of the interim conference. He ordered that the tyre samples seized on 6 November 2024 be lodged with the sub-registry and examined inter partes at the oral hearing, including by cutting them open. The order shows how the interim conference can organise the taking of physical evidence ahead of the hearing.

Question

Should seized samples, which the defendant says it has never been able to inspect, be examined inter partes, and if so how, where the defendant also challenges the admissibility of photographs filed by the claimant and their correspondence with those samples?

Decision

The judge-rapporteur left the defendant’s maintained objections on the photographs undecided. After the technically qualified judge explained that a full examination requires cutting the tyre open to view its radial carcass, he found the examination necessary and in any event advisable. The custodian must lodge the seizure report and all seized specimens with the Milan sub-registry by 30 March 2026, and the examination will take place at the oral hearing of 14 April 2026 before the panel. The value of each action was kept at EUR 500,000, subject to review after the hearing.

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Rules of Procedure
Rules 105.5 and 106

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Decisions in the same proceedings

Going further

Lexicon: Patent infringement action.

Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_770/2024 official number
  • UPC_CFI_556/2025 official number

Follow these proceedings

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 13 February 2026 Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 13 February 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_770/2024, UPC_CFI_556/2025
  2. 26 May 2026 PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_556/2025, 26 May 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_556/2025
  3. 16 July 2026 PIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 16 July 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_770/2024

    La décision du 26 mai 2026 est rectifiée par la suppression de la phrase mentionnant une dérogation (opt-out) de Pirelli, qui n'a jamais été déposée.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
Le juge rapporteur ordonne le dépôt au greffe des échantillons de pneumatiques saisis et leur examen contradictoire, découpe comprise, à l'audience du 14 avril 2026, sans trancher les objections sur les photographies.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.