Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 26 June 2026)

Date	26 June 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Brussels (BE) Local Division
Type of action	Counterclaim for revocation
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_629/2026
Registry reference	UPC-CFI-629/2026
Parties	Establishment Labs S.A. v. GC Aesthetics ParentCo Limited, Nagor Limited, GC Aesthetics Management Limited, GC Aesthetics (Distribution) Limit…

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

18 March 2026 : Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics Parentco (CFI, 18 March 2026) UPC_CFI_1357/2025 · UPC_CFI_629/2026
14 April 2026 : Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics Parentco (CFI, 14 April 2026) UPC_CFI_629/2026
4 June 2026 : Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 4 June 2026) UPC-CFI-629/2026
14 August 2026 : Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 14 August 2026) UPC-CFI-0000629/2026
28 October 2026 : Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 28 October 2026) UPC-CFI-0000629/2026
29 October 2026 : Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 29 October 2026) UPC-CFI-0000629/2026

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_629/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantEstablishment Labs S.A.12 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantGC Aesthetics ParentCo Limited8 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantNagor Limited8 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantGC Aesthetics Management Limited12 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantGC Aesthetics (Distribution) Limit4 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

18 March 2026 Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics Parentco (CFI, 18 March 2026) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_629/2026
Establishment Labs doit fournir sous 21 jours une garantie de 600 000 euros, soit la moitié du plafond provisoire des frais remboursables calculé sur la valeur cumulée de l'action et de la demande reconventionnelle, la difficulté d'exécution au Costa Rica n'étant pas établie mais sa situation financière justifiant une …
14 April 2026 Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics Parentco (CFI, 14 April 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_629/2026
La division ordonne en partie au titulaire de produire, sous 21 jours et sous astreinte de 2 000 EUR par jour, échantillons et documents sur son implant antérieur invoqué comme antériorité, avec un mécanisme gradué et une protection de la confidentialité.
4 June 2026 Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 4 June 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_629/2026
26 June 2026 Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 26 June 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_629/2026
14 August 2026 Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 14 August 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_629/2026
28 October 2026 Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 28 October 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_629/2026
À l’issue de la conférence intermédiaire, le juge-rapporteur de la division locale de Bruxelles fixe la valeur du litige et le plafond des frais, organise la clarification des positions sur l’interprétation des revendications et la confidentialité de l’audience, et prend acte des points de compétence et de validité à d…
29 October 2026 Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 29 October 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_629/2026
Le juge-rapporteur rectifie le point 11 de son ordonnance du 28 octobre 2026 : les déclarations sur la confidentialité des implants SilkSurface/SmoothSilk émanaient d’Establishment Labs, qui maintient son argument de confidentialité devant la JUB.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Counterclaim for revocation
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 14 August 2026) cited in this record
Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 26 June 2026) cited in this record
Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 4 June 2026) cited in this record
Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics Parentco (CFI, 14 April 2026) cited in this record
Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics Parentco (CFI, 18 March 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.