Promosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_485/2025, 7 July 2026)

Date	7 July 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Counterclaim for revocation
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_485/2025
Registry reference	UPC-CFI-485/2025
Parties	Promosome LLC v. BioNTech SE a.o.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_485/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantPromosome LLC7 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantBioNTech SE a.o3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

7 July 2026 Promosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_485/2025, 7 July 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_485/2025
12 October 2026 Promosome v BioNTech (CoA, 12 October 2026) Appeal · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
La cour d’appel rejette la demande de Promosome et de Scripps tendant à proroger d’un mois le délai de dépôt de leurs mémoires exposant les motifs d’appel contre BioNTech et Pfizer.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Counterclaim for revocation
Appeal: An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Promosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_846/2024, 7 July 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.