SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 16 June 2026)

Date	16 June 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Paris (FR) Local Division
Type of action	Application For Costs
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_1599/2026
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_1599/2026
Parties	SharkNinja Operating LLC v. Groupe SEB France, S.A.S. SEB, SEB International Service (SIS) and Groupe SEB WMF Consumer GmbH

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

21 May 2026 : SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 21 May 2026) UPC_CFI_1599/2026

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_1599/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantSharkNinja Operating LLC7 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantGroupe SEB France, S.A.S. SEB5 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantSEB International Service (SIS) and Groupe SEB WMF Consumer GmbH4 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

21 May 2026 SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 21 May 2026) Application RoP262A · UPC_CFI_1599/2026
Les informations financières produites par SEB à l'appui de sa demande de frais sont confidentielles, l'accès de SharkNinja étant limité à ses représentants, à leur équipe et à un seul salarié. SEB est dispensée de traduire certaines pièces.
16 June 2026 SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 16 June 2026) Application For Costs · UPC_CFI_1599/2026

What the record states

Nature of the act: Application For Costs
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La procédure de fixation des frais est suspendue jusqu’à l’arrêt de la cour d’appel sur la décision de mesures provisoires, les délais ne courant plus pendant la suspension.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 3 689 198 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 21 May 2026) cited in this record
SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 10 April 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 3 689 198`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 4 other decision(s): SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CoA, 21 August 2026) · SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 10 April 2026) · SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 21 May 2026) · SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CoA, 5 October 2026)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.