Irdeto v DJI Europe . (CFI, 12 June 2026)

Date	12 June 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_344/2025
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_344/2025
Parties	Irdeto B.V. v. DJI Europe B.V.. et.al.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

27 February 2026 : Irdeto v SZ DJI (CFI, 27 February 2026) UPC_CFI_344/2025

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_344/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantIrdeto B.V.2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantDJI Europe B.V.. et.alFollow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

27 February 2026 Irdeto v SZ DJI (CFI, 27 February 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_344/2025
La défenderesse qui dépose séparément, six mois plus tard, une demande reconventionnelle en nullité identique à celle de ses codéfenderesses doit acquitter sa propre taxe, sous peine de décision par défaut.
12 June 2026 Irdeto v DJI Europe . (CFI, 12 June 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_344/2025

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Irdeto v SZ DJI (CFI, 27 February 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.