Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 8 June 2026)

Date	8 June 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Application for provisional measures
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_1291/2026
Registry reference	UPC-CFI-0001291/2026
Parties	Nokia Technologies Oy a.o. v. Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. a.o.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

20 April 2026 : Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 20 April 2026) UPC-CFI-0001291/2026

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_1291/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantNokia Technologies Oy a.oFollow this party
defendantZhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. a.o3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

20 April 2026 Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 20 April 2026) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_1291/2026
La division interdit aux sociétés Geely de poursuivre en Chine une demande de licence provisoire mondiale faisant obstacle aux actions de Nokia devant la JUB, leur ordonne de la retirer sous 24 heures et assortit l'interdiction d'astreintes, sous condition d'une garantie de 600 000 EUR.
8 June 2026 Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 8 June 2026) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_1291/2026

What the record states

Nature of the act: Application for provisional measures
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): Le désistement de la demande de mesures provisoires est admis, la procédure est close sans décision sur les frais et la garantie de 600 000 euros est libérée.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 3 799 333 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
EP 4 090 075 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 20 April 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 3 799 333`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 4 other decision(s): Nokia Solutions and Networks v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 29 M · Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 20 April 2026) · Nokia Solutions and Networks v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 3 No · Nokia Technologies v Shanghai Sunmi Technology (CFI, 19 February 2025)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
`EP 4 090 075`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 1 June 2026) · Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 20 April 2026)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.