Decisions of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court
These decisions are recorded in UPC Litigation Watch, the Unified Patent Court case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats. Every entry links to the official decision.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
1,845 decisions recorded
Promosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_535/2025, 7 July 2026)
Read the French analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_846/2024, 7 July 2026)
Read the French analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, UPC_CFI_485/2025, 7 July 2026)
Read the French analysisEcovacs Robotics v Roborock Germany (CFI, 3 July 2026)
Read the French analysisAlign Technology v Angelalign Technology (CFI, 3 July 2026)
Read the French analysisOTEC Präzisionsfinish v ANCA Europe (CFI, 2 July 2026)
In an order of 2 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_1536/2026), presiding judge and rapporteur Thomas of the Düsseldorf Local Division discloses to OTEC Präzisionsfinish and its counsel the unredacted version of the detailed description prepared on 16 June 2026 by the expert, following the…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_539/2025, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 2 July 2026)
By order of 2 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division acknowledges that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has complied with Rule 118.8 RoP in respect of all the orders in the decision of 6 May 2026, with effect from 15 June…
Read the analysisCureVac Manufacturing v Moderna (CFI, UPC_CFI_1408/2026, 1 July 2026)
Read the French analysisCureVac Manufacturing v Moderna (CFI, UPC_CFI_1407/2026, 1 July 2026)
By order of 1 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division dismisses CureVac Manufacturing GmbH’s Rule 190 RoP application for Moderna to produce extracts from its CTD dossier and technical data sheets on an RNA manufacturing process, and confirms the…
Read the analysisParTec v Lenovo Global Technology Germany (CFI, 30 June 2026)
By order of 30 June 2026, the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses, without hearing the defendants, ParTec AG’s application for provisional measures against three Lenovo companies based on EP 3 743 812.
Read the analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 26 June 2026)
In an order of 26 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1160/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants Edwards Lifesciences, in the damages proceedings brought against Meril after the infringement decision of 4 April 2025 (EP 3 669 828), a two-day extension, until 1…
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 26 June 2026)
Read the French analysisValeo Electrification v SEG Automotive Germany (CFI, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division admits KSR International Inc. and its subsidiary Automotive Technical Advisory Service GmbH as interveners in support of the defendants in Valeo Electrification’s infringement action on EP 3 157 142…
Read the analysisASUS Technology Licensing v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications (CFI, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division confirms that the OPPO companies’ reply in the counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 346 616 was filed in time, although it had been lodged on 3 June 2026…
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026 (“Order II”), made in infringement action UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_629/2026 concerning EP 3 107 487, the Brussels Local Division rules on the second application for production of evidence brought by the GC Aesthetics defendants…
Read the analysisNatural person v SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme (CFI, 25 June 2026)
By decision of 25 June 2026, the Paris Central Division rules on the revocation action (UPC_CFI_425/2025) against SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH’s EP 2 643 717, which concerns colour-mixing collecting optics for signalling.
Read the analysisKEEEX v Adobe Systems Software Ireland (CFI, 25 June 2026)
In an order of 25 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_530/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division rules on the objections raised by Adobe, OpenAI and the other defendants against the brief filed on 5 June 2026 by KEEEX, proprietor of EP 2 949…
Read the analysisNokia Technologies v Acer (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_293/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_868/2025 (counterclaim for revocation) concerning EP 2 661 892, the Munich Local Division allows the mutual withdrawals of Nokia Technologies Oy and of the defendants Acer, Inc., Acer Computer GmbH and CPYou B.V., five days…
Read the analysisIllumina v Element Biosciences (CFI, 22 June 2026)
Read the French analysisESSITY HYGIENE AND HEALTH AKTIEBOLAG v WEPA NEDERLAND (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In an order of 22 June 2026, following a hearing on 9 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1103/2026), the single judge of The Hague Local Division, on WEPA Nederland's request for review (Rule 197.3 RoP), confirms the ex parte order of 17 April 2026 that…
Read the analysisNokia v Acer (CFI, 22 June 2026)
Read the French analysisEvac v Shanghai VacDrain Vaccuum Drainage Equipment (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In a decision of 22 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_811/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division holds partly well-founded Evac Oy's infringement action, based on two patents for vacuum sewer systems (EP 1 840 282 and EP 1 813 734), against the Chinese manufacturer Shanghai VacDrain,…
Read the analysisUPM Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In an order of 22 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_830/2024), the Munich Central Division resumes the revocation action brought by UPM-Kymmene against International N&H Denmark, which had been stayed pending the EPO proceedings, and disposes of it as devoid of purpose (Rule 360 RoP):…
Read the analysisCardo Systems v Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin (CFI, 18 June 2026)
In an order of 18 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1382/2025), the Milan Local Division, on a request for review by Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin and Resosport, revokes in its entirety the ex parte order for provisional measures granted on 5 November 2025 to Cardo Systems…
Read the analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v Motorola Mobility (CFI, 18 June 2026)
In the action for infringement of EP 3 016 464 brought by Advanced Standard Communication LLC against Motorola Mobility LLC and three other defendants, the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants Rule 262A protection for information in the rejoinder on the…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_1129/2026, 17 June 2026)
In an order of 17 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1129/2026), the Milan Local Division dismisses Ericsson's application for provisional measures against ASUSTeK and Arvato Netherlands based on EP 2 727 342 ("Reference Picture Signaling"), while the infringement action on the merits (UPC_CFI_318/2024) and the…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_1130/2026, 17 June 2026)
By order of 17 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1130/2026), a four-judge panel of the Milan Local Division dismissed for lack of urgency the application for provisional measures by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson against ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. (CFI, 17 June 2026)
In the action for infringement of EP 2 590 626 brought by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA against thirty Pfizer and BioNTech group companies (UPC_CFI_620/2025) and the joined counterclaims for revocation (UPC_CFI_1509/2025 and UPC_CFI_1511/2025), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division prepares the oral…
Read the analysisTELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTEK COMPUTER (CFI, 17 June 2026)
By order of 17 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1130/2026), the Milan Local Division dismissed for lack of urgency Ericsson's application for provisional measures against ASUSTeK Computer and Arvato Netherlands based on EP 3 076 673, which concerns decoding and encoding pictures of a video…
Read the analysisAlbert Handtmann Maschinenfabrik v VEMAG Maschinenbau (CFI, UPC_CFI_549/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisInterDigital VC v The Walt Disney (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisOrange v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_301/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisBostik v Henkel France (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisSharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisOrange v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_713/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisAlbert Handtmann Maschinenfabrik v VEMAG Maschinenbau (CFI, UPC_CFI_184/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisInterDigital VC Holdings v The Walt Disney Company (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_29/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 15 June 2026)
In proceedings UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 brought by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_1934/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_1940/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysisInsulet v EOFLOW (CFI, 12 June 2026)
In an order of 12 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1230/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Central Division orders EOFLOW to pay Insulet EUR 14,000 for the costs incurred in the application for leave to appeal (UPC_CFI_1167/2025) and in the appeal concerning a penalty payment…
Read the analysisIrdeto v DJI Europe . (CFI, 12 June 2026)
Open the entryGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, UPC_CFI_616/2025, 12 June 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_616/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_1439/2025 (counterclaim for revocation) between GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and Moderna Netherlands B.V.
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, UPC_CFI_1439/2025, 12 June 2026)
Read the French analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, 11 June 2026)
Read the French analysisHologic v Siemens Healthineers (CFI, 10 June 2026)
In a decision of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_758/2024 and UPC_CFI_259/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division rules on the infringement action brought by Hologic, Inc. against four Siemens Healthineers companies under EP 2 352 431 (breast tomosynthesis system controlling the X-ray focal spot), directed…
Read the analysisNixu FL IP Protection v Infoblox (CFI, 10 June 2026)
In an order of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_360/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division orders Nixu FL IP Protection to provide security of EUR 200,000 for the costs of Infoblox Inc., Infoblox Germany GmbH and Nomios Germany GmbH, sued for infringement…
Read the analysisFERRING v ACCORD HEALTHCARE (CFI, 9 June 2026)
Read the French analysisNixu FL IP Protection v Infoblox (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In an order of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_360/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division partly allows the preliminary objection on international jurisdiction raised by Infoblox Inc., a US company sued by Nixu FL IP Protection alongside two German-domiciled defendants for infringement…
Read the analysisMorello Forni Italia srl e Morello Forni Sas di Morello Marco & C v Gastroteam Abbe AB e Marciuliano Attrezzature di Salvatore Marciuliano (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In a decision of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_2046/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division sets at EUR 62,359.32 the costs that Gastroteam Abbe AB and Salvatore Marciuliano (Marciuliano Attrezzature) must reimburse, within thirty days, to Morello Forni Italia and Morello Forni…
Read the analysisSanofi Biotechnologies v Amgen (CFI, 8 June 2026)
The Düsseldorf Local Division lifts the stay to allow the withdrawals by Sanofi Biotechnologies SAS and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (action for infringement of EP 4 252 857, UPC_CFI_195/2025) and by the Amgen companies (counterclaim for revocation), filed in March 2026 with the…
Read the analysisNokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In an order of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1291/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division allows the withdrawal, with the respondents' consent, of the application for provisional measures brought by Nokia Technologies Oy and Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy against two Geely…
Read the analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In proceedings UPC_CFI_029/2026 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_1934/2026 and UPC_CFI_1940/2026 (counterclaims for revocation) concerning EP 3 689 383, between 2seventy bio, Inc.
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, 8 June 2026)
Read the French analysisAlign v Angelalign (CFI, 5 June 2026)
Read the French analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 4 June 2026)
By an order of 4 June 2026 in infringement action UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_629/2026 concerning EP 3 107 487, the Brussels Local Division grants Establishment Labs S.A.
Read the analysisDyson Technology v Dreame International (Hongkong) (CFI, 4 June 2026)
By order of 4 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_387/2025), the Hamburg Local Division allowed Dyson Technology to withdraw its request for a penalty payment against Dreame International (Hongkong), based on alleged breach of the provisional measures.
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 4 June 2026)
Read the French analysisSun Patent Trust v LYNK & CO International (CFI, 3 June 2026)
In a decision of 3 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1661/2025), the Hamburg Local Division permits, with the consent of the seven defendants (LYNK & CO International AB, Zeekr, Lotus and Smart Europe companies), the withdrawal of the infringement action brought by Sun Patent Trust…
Read the analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_502/2024, 2 June 2026)
By an order of 2 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division stays infringement action UPC_CFI_502/2024 brought by Koninklijke KPN N.V. against Oleading B.V.
Read the analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_2246/2025, 2 June 2026)
By order of 2 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division granted the joint request of KPN and Oleading and others to vary the order of 28 May 2026 (Rule 335 RoP).
Read the analysisBoa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 1 June 2026)
In an order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_996/2025, with UPC_CFI_737/2026 and UPC_CFI_742/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses the EUR 200,000 security for costs application filed by Shinkyung Inc.
Read the analysisNokia v Zhejiang Geely Group (CFI, 1 June 2026)
Read the French analysisFraunhofer-Gesellschaft v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_494/2025, 1 June 2026)
In a document of 1 June 2026 combining the summary of the interim conference with a procedural order, issued in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_494/2025 and UPC_CFI_495/2025 (with counterclaims for revocation), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division prepares the oral hearing of…
Read the analysisBoa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_998/2025, 1 June 2026)
By order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_998/2025, UPC_CFI_738/2026 and UPC_CFI_743/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed the application for security for costs of EUR 200,000 brought by Shinkyung against Boa Technology, proprietor of EP 3 777 595, in its infringement…
Read the analysisFraunhofer-Gesellschaft v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_495/2025, 1 June 2026)
Read the French analysisNokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 1 June 2026)
By a decision of 1 June 2026, following a settlement reached during the written procedure, the Munich Local Division allows Nokia Technologies Oy to withdraw infringement action UPC_CFI_661/2025 concerning EP 4 090 075, and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisBoa Technology v Zuatu Cycling International d.o.o. (CFI, 1 June 2026)
By order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1141/2025 and UPC_CFI_736/2026), the presiding judge, acting as judge-rapporteur, of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed the application for security for costs of EUR 200,000 brought by the defendants against Boa Technology, proprietor of EP 2 805…
Read the analysisKEEEX v ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND (CFI, 1 June 2026)
In an order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_530/2025), the panel of the Paris Local Division dismisses the request for review (Rule 333 RoP) filed by Adobe Systems Software Ireland and Adobe Inc.
Read the analysisNokia Solutions and Networks v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 29 May 2026)
By a decision of 29 May 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permits Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy to withdraw infringement action UPC_CFI_662/2025 concerning EP 3 799 333, and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisHybridgenerator v HGSystem ApS etc (CFI, 29 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTIRU v VALINEA ENERGIE (CFI, 29 May 2026)
Open the entryNokia Solutions v Zhejiang Geely Group (CFI, 29 May 2026)
Read the French analysisHybridgenerator v HGSystem (CFI, 29 May 2026)
Read the French analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_565/2024, 28 May 2026)
By an order of 28 May 2026 in joined infringement actions UPC_CFI_565/2024 and UPC_CFI_2246/2025 brought by Koninklijke KPN N.V. against Oleading B.V., Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Renault Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_1292/2025, 28 May 2026)
Read the French analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_2246/2025, 28 May 2026)
Read the French analysisDreame International (HongKong) v Dyson (CFI, 28 May 2026)
In a decision of 28 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_962/2026), the Hamburg Local Division confirms the settlement reached on 21 May 2026, the day of the oral hearing, between Dreame International (Hong Kong) Limited and Dyson Technology Limited in the provisional measures proceedings brought…
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Renault Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2025, 28 May 2026)
By a decision of 28 May 2026, following a settlement, the Düsseldorf Local Division permits Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited to withdraw infringement action UPC_CFI_629/2025 concerning EP 3 651 429, and Renault Deutschland AG and the four other defendants to withdraw…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1791/2025, 27 May 2026)
Read the French analysisBMS Innovations v BYD (CFI, UPC_CFI_2228/2025, 27 May 2026)
By order of 27 May 2026 in UPC_CFI_2228/2025 and UPC_CFI_1546/2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division ordered BMS Innovations, which is suing several BYD group companies for infringement of EP3393001, to provide security of EUR 350,000 for the costs of the…
Read the analysisLS 9 v Bellissa HAAS (CFI, 27 May 2026)
By a Rule 105 RoP order of 27 May 2026, made after the interim conference of 13 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_860/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Central Division, in LS 9 GmbH's revocation action against Bellissa HAAS GmbH's EP 2223589, prepared the oral…
Read the analysisWonderland Nurserygoods v Cybex (CFI, UPC_CFI_807/2024, 27 May 2026)
In a decision of 27 May 2026, given in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_807/2024 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_334/2025 (counterclaim for revocation), the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses both Wonderland Nurserygoods' action against Cybex GmbH, Cybex Retail GmbH and Columbus Trading-Partners and the counterclaim against EP…
Read the analysisBMS Innovations v BYD (CFI, UPC_CFI_2070/2025, 27 May 2026)
By order of 27 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_2070/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division ordered BMS Innovations, claimant in the infringement action on EP 2937706 against six companies of the BYD group, to provide security for costs of EUR 300,000 within one…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1793/2025, 27 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 27 May 2026)
By an order of 27 May 2026 in infringement actions UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 brought by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings and nine other defendants, The Hague Local Division sets up a phased confidentiality regime for Ericsson's comparable licences…
Read the analysisBrita v Wessper (CFI, 27 May 2026)
By order of 27 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_779/2024), the presiding judge of the Düsseldorf Local Division, acting as judge-rapporteur, rejected applications by Wessper Sp.
Read the analysisWonderland Nurserygoods v Cybex (CFI, UPC_CFI_334/2025, 27 May 2026)
Read the French analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, UPC_CFI_850/2026, 26 May 2026)
By an order of 26 May 2026, the Lisbon Local Division dismisses the application by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) and three of its group companies to strike out, under Rules 360 and 361, the injunction requests made by Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysisPIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_556/2025, 26 May 2026)
Read the French analysisPirelli Tyre v Tianjin Kingtyre Group (CFI, 26 May 2026)
By default decision of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_771/2024), the Milan Local Division held that Tianjin Kingtyre Group, which did not appear after service of the statement of claim in China on 2 July 2025, infringed Pirelli Tyre's patent EP 2 519 412…
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, UPC_CFI_850/2026, 26 May 2026, doc. 2)
By order of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_850/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division ordered Shenzhen Transsion, claimant in an infringement action on EP 4 123 910 against four Ericsson companies, to provide security for costs of EUR 100,000 within 21 days,…
Read the analysisPIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_770/2024, 26 May 2026)
By decision of 26 May 2026 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_770/2024 (infringement action) and UPC_CFI_556/2025 (counterclaim for revocation), the Milan Local Division ruled on Pirelli Tyre's action against Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber on EP 3 519 207, concerning a motorcycle tyre.
Read the analysisDall Energy v Polytechnik Luft- und Feuerungstechnik (CFI, 26 May 2026)
Read the French analysisSun Patent Trust v Vivo Mobile Communication Iberia (CFI, UPC_CFI_362/2025, 22 May 2026)
By procedural order of 22 May 2026, following an online case management meeting held the day before, the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division amended the hearing dates in Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo companies based on EP 3…
Read the analysisEyesmatch v Google Ireland (CFI, 22 May 2026)
By procedural order of 22 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_808/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division, in Eyesmatch's infringement action on EP 4 184 443 against Google Ireland and Google Commerce, raised the provisional value of the dispute from EUR 2,000,000 to EUR…
Read the analysisSun Patent Trust v Vivo Mobile Communication Iberia (CFI, UPC_CFI_361/2025, 22 May 2026)
By procedural order of 22 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_361/2025) the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division amended the hearing dates in Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo companies, based on EP 3 852 468: a hearing on 9 September 2026 at…
Read the analysis