Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 1 June 2026)
| Date | 1 June 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_661/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_661/2025 |
| Parties | Nokia Technologies Oy v. Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. a.o. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By a decision of 1 June 2026, following a settlement reached during the written procedure, the Munich Local Division allows Nokia Technologies Oy to withdraw infringement action UPC_CFI_661/2025 concerning EP 4 090 075, and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. and the 31 other defendants to withdraw counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_236/2026. Each party bears its own costs. The refund of court fees is limited to 50% for each side, although the claimant had asked for 60%. Departing from the Mannheim Local Division, the decision confirms that the applicable version of Rule 370.9(b) depends on the date of the application to withdraw.
Question
Which rate of court fee refund applies to a withdrawal filed after 31 December 2025 in proceedings started earlier?
Decision
The withdrawals are permitted, each side having consented to the other’s withdrawal (paragraphs 6 to 9). Since the parties stated that they sought no costs decision, each bears its own costs (paragraph 10). The division applies Rule 370.9(b) as in force since 1 January 2026, the Court of Appeal having held in four decisions that the filing date of the application to withdraw is decisive. It declines to follow the diverging view of the Mannheim Local Division of 27 March 2026 and sees no need to grant leave to appeal (paragraphs 11 to 14). Each side is refunded 50% of the fees paid and Nokia’s request for more is rejected (paragraph 15 and operative part).
Key points for practice
- For a withdrawal filed after 31 December 2025, the fee refund follows the new Rule 370.9(b), whatever the date on which the action was brought (paragraphs 12 and 13).
- A joint statement that no costs decision is sought is normally read as each party bearing its own costs (paragraph 10).
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 69
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 265.1, 265.2, 370.9 and 370.11
- Case law cited
- MSG Maschinenbau v EJP Maschinen, Munich Local Division, 11 October 2024, VMR Products v NJOY Netherlands, Court of Appeal, 9 January 2026, Black Sheep Retail Products v HL Display, Court of Appeal, 6 March 2026, Court of Appeal, 9 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_15/2026), Nokia v Warner Bros. Discovery, Mannheim Local Division, 27 March 2026, not followed
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Standard essential patent (SEP), FRAND offer and counter-offer, Injunctions and standard essential patents, Patent infringement action.
Dhenne Avocats blog: FRAND at the UPC: What the Court Has Decided, What Remains Open.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Munich’s FRAND Guidelines: A Compass Drawn Too Finely, Tesla v. InterDigital and the FRAND Undertaking Inside the Pool (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Further reading: M. Dhenne, “Calculation of FRAND Royalties: An Overview of Practices Around the World”, European Intellectual Property Review 2019, vol. 41, no. 12, p. 754. M. Dhenne, “Conversant v LG: What about FRAND in France?”, European Intellectual Property Review 2019, vol. 41, no. 9, p. 585.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantNokia Technologies Oy12 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantZhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd. a.o3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Les désistements réciproques sont admis, chaque partie conserve ses frais et le remboursement des taxes est limité à 50 % en application de la règle 370.9, b), dans sa version en vigueur depuis le 1er janvier 2026.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 4 090 075mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Nokia Technologies v Warner Bros. Discovery (CFI, 27 March 2026) cited in this record
- Black Sheep Retail Products v HL Display (CoA, 6 March 2026) cited in this record
- VMR Products v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, 9 January 2026) cited in this record
- MSG Maschinenbau v EJP Maschinen (CFI, 11 October 2024) cited in this record
- Nokia v Zhejiang Geely Group (CFI, 1 June 2026) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 4 090 075 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 8 June 2026) · Nokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 20 April 2026) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.