These decisions are recorded in UPC Litigation Watch, the Unified Patent Court case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats. Every entry links to the official decision.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
1,845 decisions recorded
By an order of 11 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_879/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division allowed Faro Technologies to withdraw its application for the assessment of costs against Blankenhorn, following proceedings UPC_CFI_500/2025 (EP 4 001 835).
Read the analysisBy an order of 11 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_515/2025, EP 3 835 965), the Düsseldorf Local Division held, on a reasoned request by Hewlett-Packard Development, that the steps already taken to bring its application for provisional measures to the attention of Shenzhen Moan…
Read the analysisBy a reasoned order of 11 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_771/2025 and UPC_CFI_802/2025, EP 2 147 029), the panel of the Munich Local Division, on review under Rule 333, confirmed the admission to the confidentiality club of two individuals from the Syensqo group, to…
Read the analysisBy an order of 7 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_1041/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division extended to 16 March 2026 the time limit for the defence, and any counterclaim for revocation, of the four Micron companies sued by Yangtze Memory Technologies for…
Read the analysisBy an order of 6 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_1443/2025), given without hearing the defendant on the day after the application was filed, the Hamburg Local Division granted Brita SE's application for provisional measures against Fileder Filter Systems Spółka z o.o., a Polish supplier…
Read the analysisBy an order of 6 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_723/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed the request by the six Angelalign companies for EUR 400,000 in security for costs against Align Technology, a US company, in provisional measures proceedings based on EP 4 346…
Read the analysisBy a decision of 5 November 2025, given in infringement action UPC_CFI_461/2024 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_718/2024, the Hamburg Local Division, sitting with a technically qualified judge, ruled on the dispute between Dolle A/S and four FAKRO companies over EP 2 476…
Read the analysisBy an order of 31 October 2025, given in revocation action UPC_CFI_104/2025 and counterclaim for infringement UPC_CFI_364/2025, the Paris Central Division declined, despite the agreement of all parties, to apply Rule 340.1 to join that counterclaim with the infringement action pending before…
Read the analysisThe judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division dismisses the preliminary objections raised by several Geely group companies, sued by Nokia Solutions and Networks for infringement of EP 3 799 333 (resource allocation in a mobile system) on account of vehicles implementing 4G/LTE…
Read the analysisBy order of 3 November 2025, made after the interim conference (Rule 105.5) in Adeia Guides’ infringement action against three Disney group companies concerning EP 1 969 839 and in the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_666/2024 and UPC_CFI_199/2025), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague…
Read the analysisBy an order of 31 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_630/2025), given after an inter partes hearing, the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on Occlutech's application for provisional measures against Lepu Medical (Europa) Cooperatief and Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing), based on EP 1 998 686 (occlusion…
Read the analysisBy order of 30 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_361/2025, EP 3 852 468 with unitary effect), the Paris Local Division, sitting as a full panel, dismissed the preliminary objection raised by Vivo Mobile Communication Iberia, Vivo Tech and Vivo Mobile Communication in Sun Patent…
Read the analysisBy order of 30 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_362/2025), the Paris Local Division rejected the preliminary objection raised by three Vivo companies against Sun Patent Trust's infringement action on EP 3 407 524.
Read the analysisBy order of 29 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_743/2025, EP 4 003 084), the President of the Court of First Instance, after consulting the panel of the Munich Local Division, granted the application of the Skechers companies, the defendants, and changed the language of…
Read the analysisBy an order of 28 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_555/2024), issued after the interim conference of 22 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division ruled on the admissibility of a series of documents and arguments in Malikie Innovations' infringement action against Nintendo…
Read the analysisBy a summary of the interim conference of 22 October 2025 with orders, dated 28 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_537/2024, EP 2 579 551), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division admitted everything in dispute in Malikie Innovations' infringement action against Nintendo Co.
Read the analysisBy order of 28 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_729/2025, EP 3 614 263), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division ordered ParTec, the second claimant and patent proprietor, to provide security for costs of EUR 80,500 in favour of NVIDIA Corporation and NVIDIA GmbH…
Read the analysisBy decision of 27 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_178/2024 and UPC_CFI_432/2024), the Milan Local Division upheld the counterclaim of AWM and Schnell, revoked in its entirety Progress Maschinen & Automation's EP 2 726 230, concerning the continuous production of lattice girders, dismissed the application…
Read the analysisBy a panel order of 27 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_127/2025, proceedings in Italian), the Milan Local Division dismissed Xelom's request to revoke the ex parte order of 18 March 2025, which had granted Prinoth a description of evidence and the seizure of a…
Read the analysisBy decision of 24 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_612/2024, proceedings in French), the Paris Local Division dismissed the action for literal and equivalent infringement brought by Raccords et Plastiques Nicoll (RPN) against First Plast France, First Plast, First Corporation and Plasticos First Iberica, based…
Read the analysisBy order of 24 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_478/2025, EP 2 791 402), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division authorised Avient Protective Materials to serve its Statement of Claim on two Chinese companies, referred to together as 'Xinji', by personal delivery by a…
Read the analysisBy decision of 23 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_497/2024, revocation action, and UPC_CFI_571/2024, revocation counterclaim), the Milan Central Division ruled on the validity of Labrador Diagnostics' EP 3 756 767, concerning modular point-of-care devices, challenged by bioMérieux UK and several bioMérieux group companies.
Read the analysisBy order of 22 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_587/2025), The Hague Local Division dismissed Abbott Diabetes Care's application for provisional measures against Sinocare and A.
Read the analysisBy order of 22 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_575/2025, EP 2 563 695), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division dismissed the preliminary objection of the seven defendants in Honeywell Control Systems' infringement action against Sovex Systems, several Solvest companies, Solvink, De Kleine Beuk…
Read the analysisBy a decision by default of 21 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_499/2024), The Hague Local Division, sitting as a full panel, upheld Amycel's infringement action based on EP 1 993 350 B2 concerning brown mushrooms for commercial production, against a defendant established in Poland…
Read the analysisThe Paris Central Division dismisses Meril’s revocation action against Edwards Lifesciences’ EP 4 151 181 (prosthetic heart valve and delivery assembly), maintains the patent as amended by Auxiliary Request 2 and grants the counterclaim for infringement against the Octacor and Octapro systems.
Read the analysisBy decision of 20 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_559/2025, EP 3 297 043), the Munich Local Division permitted Shangrao Xinyuan Yuedong Technology Development to withdraw its infringement action against LONGi Solar Technologie, three other companies and an individual, following a settlement with the four…
Read the analysisBy decision of 17 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_404/2025 and UPC_CFI_405/2025, EP 3 669 828), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division ordered Meril GmbH, Meril Life Sciences and Meril Italy to pay Edwards Lifesciences EUR 771,649.56 in costs within 20 days, in the…
Read the analysisBy order of 17 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_693/2025, proceedings in German), the Munich Local Division dismissed ONWARD Medical's application for provisional measures against Niche Biomedical (ANEUVO), based on EP 3 421 081 concerning a neuromodulation system and directed at the ExaStim stimulation system…
Read the analysisBy order of 17 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_624/2025), The Hague Local Division granted Abbott Diabetes Care's application for provisional measures against Sinocare and A.
Read the analysisThe judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, with the agreement of the claimant AX Wireless, aligns the time limits of Xiaomi Technology Germany and Xiaomi Technology Netherlands with those of Xiaomi Inc.
Read the analysisBy order of 17 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_515/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division granted Hewlett-Packard Development provisional measures against Andreas Rentmeister e.K., which runs the toneroffice.de shop, based on EP 3 835 965 concerning logic circuitry for print cartridges.
Read the analysisIn an order of 16 October 2025, the Munich Local Division allowed the defendants to withdraw their counterclaim for revocation of Brita's patent EP 2 387 547 (UPC_CFI_564/2024, linked to infringement action UPC_CFI_248/2024), although the division had already ruled on the merits…
Read the analysisIn an order of 16 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Central Division partly granted Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer's request for access to the file of the proceedings Insulet v EOFLOW (UPC_CFI_380/2024).
Read the analysisIn an order of 16 October 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division held that the steps already taken to bring Hewlett-Packard's application for provisional measures to the attention of the Chinese company Zhuhai ouguan Electronic Technology constitute good service under Rule 275.2, effective…
Read the analysisIn an order of 15 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Leap Tools to serve its statement of claim of 13 June 2025 on the second defendant, Wizart LLC, a Delaware company that could not be found at…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 15 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Central Division assessed the recoverable costs payable by EOFLOW to Insulet following the decision on the merits of 22 July 2025 (proceedings UPC_CFI_773/2025 and UPC_CFI_774/2025, patent EP 4 201 327).
Read the analysisThe judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permits the withdrawal of Huawei’s infringement action on EP 3 567 731 (UPC_CFI_247/2025) and of MediaTek Germany’s counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_664/2025), each with the other side’s consent, and declares both proceedings closed.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 15 October 2025, given in joined proceedings UPC_CFI_115/2024 and UPC_CFI_377/2024, the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed Hartmann Packaging's infringement action against two Omni-Pac companies and partly allowed their counterclaim for revocation of EP 2 755 901, which concerns a…
Read the analysisIn an order of 14 October 2025, given in proceedings UPC_CFI_135/2024 and UPC_CFI_477/2024 (patent EP 3 605 534), the Düsseldorf Local Division, on the application of Beko Germany and Arçelik and after hearing Dolby International, cancelled the oral hearing set for 16…
Read the analysisIn an order of 14 October 2025, given in proceedings UPC_CFI_807/2024 and UPC_CFI_334/2025, the panel of the Düsseldorf Local Division upheld the judge-rapporteur's order of 29 August 2025: Wonderland Nurserygoods may extend, in its reply, its equivalence case to features 1.9 and…
Read the analysisIn an order of 14 October 2025, given in joined proceedings UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the unsolicited submission filed by Ona Patents on 1 September 2025 against Google Ireland and Google Commerce (patent EP…
Read the analysisIn an order of 13 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division refused to postpone the deadline for the Vivo companies' statement of defence in the infringement action brought by Sun Patent Trust on EP 3 407 524 (UPC_CFI_362/2025).
Read the analysisIn an order of 13 October 2025, given in joined proceedings UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024 (patent EP 2 263 098), the panel of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed Ona Patents' request under Rule 333 for review of the summons to the oral hearing…
Read the analysisThe Munich Local Division revokes claims 1 and 11 of Motorola Mobility’s EP 3 972 309 (split bearer configuration in dual connectivity) for added matter over the parent application, rejects the amendment requests and, as a result, dismisses the infringement action against…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 10 October 2025, given in joined proceedings UPC_CFI_114/2024 (infringement action) and UPC_CFI_448/2024 (counterclaim for revocation, application to amend and application under Rule 362), the Munich Local Division considered Heraeus Electronics' patent EP 3 215 288 on a metal…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 9 October 2025, given in infringement action UPC_CFI_132/2024 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_524/2025, the Mannheim Local Division dismissed both claims between Total Semiconductor and three Texas Instruments companies concerning EP 2 746 957, on an intelligent interrupt distributor…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 7 October 2025, given in infringement action UPC_CFI_216/2024 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_556/2024 between Cretes and Hyler (patents EP 3 993 602 and EP 4 284 152), the Brussels Local Division confirmed the parties' settlement, closed both proceedings,…
Read the analysisIn an order of 7 October 2025, the Milan Local Division, on the parties' joint request, found that Hypertherm's infringement action against Tec.Mo. (UPC_CFI_226/2025) had become devoid of purpose following a settlement, held that there was no need to adjudicate and closed…
Read the analysisIn an order of 3 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division allowed Corning to withdraw its infringement action on EP 3 296 274 (UPC_CFI_819/2024) against the three LG Electronics companies, and allowed those companies to withdraw their counterclaim for…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_162/2024), the Mannheim Local Division dismissed the separated part of Hurom's infringement action against the Korean company NUC Electronics Co., Ltd concerning the Polish, Spanish and UK parts of EP 2 028 981 (juice extractor).
Read the analysisIn a decision of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_159/2024), the Mannheim Local Division ruled on the separated part of Hurom's infringement action against NUC Electronics Europe and WARMCOOK concerning the Polish, Spanish, Turkish and UK parts of EP 2 028 981 (juice extractor).
Read the analysisIn an order of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_636/2025), the Mannheim Local Division, on a request for panel review under Rule 333, confirmed the judge-rapporteur's order of 25 July 2025 refusing to impose penalties on Palo Alto Networks for non-compliance with a saisie…
Read the analysisIn an order of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_496/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, of its own motion and under Rule 353, rectified paragraph 6 of the operative part of its decision of 29 September 2025, which contained a clerical error and a calculation…
Read the analysisBy an order of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_636/2025), the Mannheim Local Division, on Palo Alto Networks' request for review under Rule 197.3, revoked the order to preserve evidence granted without hearing the defendant on 3 June 2025 in favour of Centripetal (EP…
Read the analysisIn an order of 1 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_611/2025), issued in German, the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division rejected the preliminary objections of Grizzly Tools and three Lidl companies challenging the UPC's jurisdiction over the Polish, Spanish and UK parts of EP…
Read the analysisIn an order of 1 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_808/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division set the timetable for the provisional measures proceedings brought on 29 August 2025 by Guardant Health against four Sophia Genetics companies.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 30 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_320/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with Headwater Research's consent, allowed four Samsung companies to withdraw their counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 110 069, declared those proceedings closed and ordered each party to bear its…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 30 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_688/2025), the Hamburg Local Division confirmed, under Rule 365.1, the settlement of 10 September 2025 ending MED-EL's infringement action on EP 4 074 373 against two Nurotron companies.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 29 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_496/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Headwater Research to withdraw its infringement action on EP 3 110 072, filed on 6 June 2024 against five Samsung companies, which consented.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 26 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_26/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with the consent of the four Samsung defendants, allowed Headwater Research to withdraw its infringement action on EP 3 110 069.
Read the analysisIn an order of 26 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_315/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division summoned Labrador Diagnostics and the six bioMérieux defendants under Rule 108 to the oral hearing of the infringement action on EP 3 756 767, set for 27…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 25 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_323/2025), issued in French, the Paris Central Division confirmed under Rule 365 the settlement concluded on 22 September 2025 between Scantrust and Advanced Track And Trace, ending the revocation action against EP 2 364 485…
Read the analysisIn an order of 25 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_897/2025), the standing judge of The Hague Local Division granted, without hearing the other side, a precautionary seizure of an SD-14010 machine exhibited by the Turkish company Esde Makine at an agricultural trade fair in…
Read the analysisIn an order of 23 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_342/2025), issued in Italian, the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division organised access to the documents gathered when a seizure to preserve evidence was executed for 3V Sigma against ACEF and AGA.
Read the analysisIn an order of 22 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_885/2025), issued in German, the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered, without first hearing the respondent, the inspection of a DLyte PRO500 Automated Cell exhibited by STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE at the EMO trade fair in Hanover, at…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 18 September 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division, with the parties' consent, stayed the infringement actions and revocation counterclaims between Atlas Global and TP-LINK CORPORATION PTE.
Read the analysisBy an order of 17 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_479/2025, ORD_36945/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Hague Local Division recorded the intention of Washtower IP and Washtower to enforce parts I.B, I.C, II, IV and V of the provisional measures order of 11 September 2025…
Read the analysisBy an order of 17 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024, App_36172/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered reimbursement to the Apple companies of 40% of the court fees paid for their revocation counterclaim against Ona Patents and Ekahau (EP 2 263 098), namely…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 17 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_297/2025 and UPC_CFI_651/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division decided, with the parties' consent, to hear together InterDigital CE Patent Holdings' infringement action against eleven Disney group companies (EP 2 080 349) and the revocation counterclaim…
Read the analysisBy an order of 17 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_697/2025, ORD_37065/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division limited the length of written pleadings in the provisional measures proceedings brought by Merz Therapeutics, Merz Pharmaceuticals and Merz Pharma France against Viatris Santé (EP 2…
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_247/2025, App_33294/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division partly granted MediaTek Germany's request for production of documents (Rule 190) in Huawei's infringement action (EP 3 567 731).
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 15 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_135/2024 and UPC_CFI_477/2024, App_36556/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Dolby International to engage, at its own cost, a simultaneous interpreter from German into English for the hearing of 16 October 2025…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_132/2024, App_20197/2025), the Mannheim Local Division dismissed Total Semiconductor's request for panel review (Rule 333) of the judge-rapporteur's order of 11 April 2025 requiring it to provide EUR 600,000 security for costs in its infringement…
Read the analysisBy order of 15 September 2025, common to the four infringement actions brought by Sanofi group companies on European patent EP 2 493 466 (UPC_CFI_145/2024 to UPC_CFI_148/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division summons the two party experts to the oral…
Read the analysisBy a decision of 12 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_486/2025, App_36427/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with the defendants' consent, allowed Eyesmatch to withdraw its infringement action against Microsoft Corp.
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 12 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_733/2024 and UPC_CFI_255/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the single pleading filed on 25 August 2025 by TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik in the revocation counterclaim and the amendment proceedings, in its dispute with…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_481/2025, App_34862/2025), the President of the Court of First Instance granted HMD Global's application and changed the language of the proceedings from German to English, the language in which EP 3 667 981 was granted,…
Read the analysisBy a decision of 12 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_338/2024 and UPC_CFI_778/2024), the Mannheim Local Division upheld bellissa HAAS's infringement action against Windhager GmbH based on EP 2 223 589 (bed edging made of interlocking sheet-metal strips) and dismissed the revocation counterclaim.
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 12 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_733/2024 and UPC_CFI_255/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division refused to admit the new auxiliary requests to amend EP 2 624 031 filed late by TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik (Rule 30.2), together with the further pleading…
Read the analysisBy a provisional order of 11 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_247/2025), the presiding judge of the Mannheim Local Division protected under Rule 262A the technical information in MediaTek Germany's Statement of Defence and revocation counterclaim on the operation of certain chips, in Huawei's infringement…
Read the analysisBy an order of 11 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024, App_35855/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered reimbursement to Ona Patents of 40% of the court fees paid for its infringement action against the Apple companies (EP 2 263 098), namely EUR 20,000,…
Read the analysisBy an order of 11 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_479/2025), the Hague Local Division largely granted the application for provisional measures brought by Washtower IP and Washtower against IBBH, BEGA Consult, BEGA BBK and NEG Novex, based on unitary patent EP 3 522 755…
Read the analysis