Opens in a new tab

3V Sigma v ACEF (CFI, 23 September 2025)

Date23 September 2025
CourtCFI
DivisionMilan (IT) Local Division
Type of actionApplication RoP262A
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_342/2025
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_342/2025
Parties3VSigma v. AGA-ACEF

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

In an order of 23 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_342/2025), issued in Italian, the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division organised access to the documents gathered when a seizure to preserve evidence was executed for 3V Sigma against ACEF and AGA. He refused to exclude the applicant’s representatives from the confidentiality club and also admitted one independent consultant and one officer of 3V Sigma. The order is a reminder that restricting access under Rule 262A must rest on concrete reasons.

Question

May the defendant have the applicant’s representatives and its sole natural person kept away from confidential technical information obtained through a seizure?

Decision

3V Sigma’s access to documents 1, 2, 19 and 20, which fell outside the seizure order, was barred, as the applicant had accepted. Documents 3 to 18, mainly technical data from the manufacturer of the filter at issue received under a duty of confidence, were classified as confidential within Article 58 UPCA. Absent any concrete reason, excluding the applicant’s representatives, which would depart from the ordinary regime of Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2016/943 and Rule 262A, was refused, their teams have access under their responsibility. Only one independent consultant was admitted, the technical issues not warranting more, together with one natural person from 3V Sigma, Rule 262A.6 requiring at least one person from each party. Access was set for 21 October 2025, unless review is sought.

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
Arts 58 and 60(6)
Rules of Procedure
Rules 197.3, 262A and 333
Other provisions
Directive (EU) 2016/943, Art. 9
Case law cited
Düsseldorf Local Division, 15 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_181/2024), Court of Appeal, 12 February 2025 (UPC_CoA_621/2024), Court of Appeal, 3 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_221/2025)

Related decisions

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Decisions in the same proceedings

Going further

Lexicon: Confidentiality club.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_342/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 19 May 2025 3V Sigma v A.C.E.F. (CFI, 19 May 2025) Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192 · UPC_CFI_342/2025

    La division locale de Milan accorde sans audition de l'adversaire une saisie limitée aux échantillons et à la documentation technique chez la filiale distributrice, exclut la société mère et les documents comptables, et subordonne l'exécution à une garantie de 15 000 euros.

  2. 23 September 2025 3V Sigma v ACEF (CFI, 23 September 2025) Application RoP262A · UPC_CFI_342/2025
  3. 5 December 2025 3V Sigma v A.G.A (CFI, 5 December 2025) Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192 · UPC_CFI_342/2025

    La demande de réexamen de l'ordonnance de conservation des preuves du 19 mai 2025 est rejetée et le dépôt tardif d'un rapport d'expertise commandé après cette demande est refusé.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Application RoP262A
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
Le juge-rapporteur qualifie de confidentielles les pièces techniques issues de la saisie et y admet les représentants du requérant, un consultant indépendant et un dirigeant de 3V Sigma, faute de raison concrète de les exclure.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.