Opens in a new tab

SCANTRUST v ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE (CFI, 25 September 2025)

Date25 September 2025
CourtCFI
DivisionParis (FR) Central Division - Seat
Type of actionGeneric Order
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_323/2025
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_323/2025
PartiesSCANTRUST v. ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_323/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 25 September 2025 Scantrust v Advanced Track And Trace (CFI, 25 September 2025) Application Rop 365 · UPC_CFI_323/2025

    La division centrale homologue la transaction du 22 septembre 2025, maintient confidentielle sa version non caviardée, ordonne l'inscription au registre et laisse à chaque partie ses frais.

  2. 25 September 2025 SCANTRUST v ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE (CFI, 25 September 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_323/2025

What the record states

Nature of the act
Generic Order
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.