Scantrust v Advanced Track And Trace (CFI, 25 September 2025)
| Date | 25 September 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
| Type of action | Application Rop 365 |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_323/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_323/2025 |
| Parties | SCANTRUST / v / ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 25 September 2025 : SCANTRUST v ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE (CFI, 25 September 2025) UPC_CFI_323/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantv14 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantSCANTRUST2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 25 September 2025 Scantrust v Advanced Track And Trace (CFI, 25 September 2025) Application Rop 365 · UPC_CFI_323/2025
- 25 September 2025 SCANTRUST v ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE (CFI, 25 September 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_323/2025
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application Rop 365
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division centrale homologue la transaction du 22 septembre 2025, maintient confidentielle sa version non caviardée, ordonne l'inscription au registre et laisse à chaque partie ses frais.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 364 485mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- SCANTRUST v ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE (CFI, 25 September 2025) cited in this record
Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 364 485 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.