Opens in a new tab

Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 15 October 2025)

Date15 October 2025
CourtCFI
DivisionDüsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of actionGeneric Order
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_541/2025
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_541/2025
PartiesLeap Tools Inc. v. Wizart Inc. a. o.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

In an order of 15 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Leap Tools to serve its statement of claim of 13 June 2025 on the second defendant, Wizart LLC, a Delaware company that could not be found at its US addresses, by delivery to its CEO at a business address in Poland (Rule 275). The order shows the level of search expected of a claimant before an alternative method of service is allowed.

Question

After two failed attempts at service in the United States, may the statement of claim be served on a corporate defendant by delivery to its CEO at a business address in another country?

Decision

Yes. Rule 275.1 allows an alternative method where ordinary service has failed, provided, under Rule 275.4, that it is not contrary to the law of the place of service (paragraph 10). Two attempts had failed: one through the Hague Convention at Wizart LLC’s original address in Wilmington (Rule 274.1(a)(ii)), the other through the registered agent of the first defendant, which stated that it did not act for Wizart LLC (paragraphs 12 to 14). The claimant showed serious searches in the Delaware registry and online, and no further search could reasonably be expected (paragraphs 15 and 16). Polish law allows service on a managing director (paragraph 17).

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Rules of Procedure
Rules 274.1(a)(ii) and 275
Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad
referred to without a specific article

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Decisions in the same proceedings

Going further

Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_541/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 15 October 2025 Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 15 October 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_541/2025
  2. 17 November 2025 Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 17 November 2025) Withdrawal (RoP265) · UPC_CFI_541/2025

    Le désistement de l'action en contrefaçon à l'égard de Wizart LLC est autorisé, la procédure close à son égard et les frais correspondants mis à la charge de Leap Tools.

  3. 19 February 2026 Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 19 February 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_541/2025

    La division locale de Düsseldorf rejette la demande de garantie pour frais visant un demandeur canadien, faute de preuve du droit canadien et d'éléments sur une instabilité financière.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Generic Order
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
Après deux tentatives infructueuses aux États-Unis, le mémoire en demande peut être signifié à Wizart LLC par remise à son dirigeant à une adresse professionnelle en Pologne.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.