Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 15 October 2025)
| Date | 15 October 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic Order |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_541/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_541/2025 |
| Parties | Leap Tools Inc. v. Wizart Inc. a. o. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 17 November 2025 : Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 17 November 2025) UPC_CFI_541/2025
- 19 February 2026 : Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 19 February 2026) UPC_CFI_541/2025 · UPC_CFI_1313/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In an order of 15 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Leap Tools to serve its statement of claim of 13 June 2025 on the second defendant, Wizart LLC, a Delaware company that could not be found at its US addresses, by delivery to its CEO at a business address in Poland (Rule 275). The order shows the level of search expected of a claimant before an alternative method of service is allowed.
Question
After two failed attempts at service in the United States, may the statement of claim be served on a corporate defendant by delivery to its CEO at a business address in another country?
Decision
Yes. Rule 275.1 allows an alternative method where ordinary service has failed, provided, under Rule 275.4, that it is not contrary to the law of the place of service (paragraph 10). Two attempts had failed: one through the Hague Convention at Wizart LLC’s original address in Wilmington (Rule 274.1(a)(ii)), the other through the registered agent of the first defendant, which stated that it did not act for Wizart LLC (paragraphs 12 to 14). The claimant showed serious searches in the Delaware registry and online, and no further search could reasonably be expected (paragraphs 15 and 16). Polish law allows service on a managing director (paragraph 17).
Key points for practice
- Before seeking an alternative method, the claimant should be able to document its address searches. Here the judge-rapporteur asked for further details before ruling.
- Service on a company’s CEO in a third country requires checking that the law of that country permits it (Rule 275.4).
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 274.1(a)(ii) and 275
- Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad
- referred to without a specific article
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantLeap Tools Inc.3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantWizart Inc. a. o2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 15 October 2025 Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 15 October 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_541/2025
- 17 November 2025 Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 17 November 2025) Withdrawal (RoP265) · UPC_CFI_541/2025
Le désistement de l'action en contrefaçon à l'égard de Wizart LLC est autorisé, la procédure close à son égard et les frais correspondants mis à la charge de Leap Tools.
- 19 February 2026 Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 19 February 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_541/2025
La division locale de Düsseldorf rejette la demande de garantie pour frais visant un demandeur canadien, faute de preuve du droit canadien et d'éléments sur une instabilité financière.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic Order
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Après deux tentatives infructueuses aux États-Unis, le mémoire en demande peut être signifié à Wizart LLC par remise à son dirigeant à une adresse professionnelle en Pologne.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 19 February 2026) cited in this record
- Leap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 17 November 2025) cited in this record
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.