Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Confidentiality" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
131 decisions recorded
In an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…
Read the analysisIn an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 under Rule 353 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division, seized the same day by the defendants with Establishment Labs’ agreement, rectifies para.
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 under Rule 353 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division, seized the same day by the defendants with Establishment Labs’ agreement, rectifies para.
Read the analysisIn an order of 28 October 2026 under Rule 105 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division followed up on the interim conference held by videoconference on 27 October 2026 in Establishment Labs’ action for infringement of EP…
Read the analysisIn an order of 28 October 2026 under Rule 105 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division followed up on the interim conference held by videoconference on 27 October 2026 in Establishment Labs’ action for infringement of EP…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 28 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_154/2026), the President of the Court of Appeal, acting as judge-rapporteur, orders that a London law firm be given, after redaction of personal data, Sumi Agro’s request for rehearing of 5 May 2025 and Syngenta’s…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 26 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_155/2026 and UPC_CoA_156/2026), the Court of Appeal largely grants a London law firm’s request for access to the pleadings and evidence in Suinno’s applications for rehearing against Microsoft (UPC_CoA_883/2025 and UPC_CoA_892/2025), after redaction of personal…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 26 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_155/2026 and UPC_CoA_156/2026), the Court of Appeal largely grants a London law firm’s request for access to the pleadings and evidence in Suinno’s applications for rehearing against Microsoft (UPC_CoA_883/2025 and UPC_CoA_892/2025), after redaction of personal…
Read the analysisIn a procedural order of 26 October 2026, issued in German (UPC_CFI_672/2026 and UPC_CFI_2175/2026, EP 1 934 794 B1), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classifies as confidential the highlighted information in the defendants’ rejoinder of 19 October 2026 and its…
Read the analysisBy an order of 14 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_42/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the UPC Court of Appeal, seised by REEL of an application for the protection of its confidential information under Rule 262A RoP, granted interim confidentiality protection pending a decision on the…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1696/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, sitting as a full panel, upheld the judge-rapporteur’s order of 21 August 2026 on the disclosure of confidential information concerning the Pilot 1 plant.
Read the analysisBy an order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1332/2026), the Düsseldorf Local Division set the terms on which the detailed description prepared by the court-appointed expert, following the inspection and preservation of evidence proceedings brought by fiskaly against Swissbit, may be released.
Read the analysisBy an order of 23 September 2026, published on 16 October 2026, Judge-rapporteur Edger Brinkman of The Hague Local Division set the next steps in Koninklijke Philips’s infringement actions against Quectel Wireless Solutions and eight other companies (UPC_CFI_2244/2025 and UPC_CFI_2245/2025, counterclaims UPC_CFI_1450/2026…
Read the analysisBy order of 23 September 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division draws the consequences of the second case management hearing held on 8 September 2026 in the infringement actions brought by Koninklijke Philips against Quectel and related companies, with counterclaims…
Read the analysisIn an order of 21 September 2026 published on 29 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_319/2024 and UPC_CFI_728/2024), presiding judge and judge-rapporteur Pierluigi Perrotti of the Milan Local Division sets the conduct of the hearing of 24 and 25 September 2026 in Ericsson’s action against…
Read the analysisIn an order of 21 September 2026 published on 29 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_318/2024 and UPC_CFI_730/2024), judge-rapporteur Alima Zana of the Milan Local Division sets the conduct of the hearing of 24 and 25 September 2026 in Ericsson’s action against ASUSTek and Arvato…
Read the analysisOn Micron’s application for protection of technical information on the Z01M chip, produced in support of a prior user right, the Local Division refuses an attorneys’ eyes only regime (paras.
Read the analysisIn an order of 11 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_1034/2025 and UPC_CFI_931/2026, EP 3 909 047), the Düsseldorf Local Division grants Yangtze Memory Technologies the confidentiality protection it sought for a TechInsights technical report (Exhibit BB 24) and for the passages of its reply…
Read the analysisIn a procedural order of 1 April 2026 (UPC_CFI_1034/2025 and UPC_CFI_931/2026), the Düsseldorf Local Division deals with Micron's request under Rule 262A RoP to protect its estimated 2026 gross profit from direct sales of the attacked products in Germany and France (EP…
Read the analysisThe Court of Appeal dismisses Huawei’s appeals against the orders of the Munich Local Division of 28 November 2025 granting TP-Link access to written pleadings in the closed actions between Huawei and Netgear concerning the patent asserted against TP-Link (paras.
Read the analysisNon-public details of licence negotiations constitute confidential information within the meaning of Rule 262A, and protection may be extended in advance to all future pleadings relating to those negotiations, to avoid repeated orders, each party retaining the option to seek enhanced protection…
Read the analysisA licence agreement concluded with a third party is classified as highly confidential information, access being reserved to three designated persons of the claimant, its economic expert and that expert’s team, and the representatives registered in the parallel proceedings, exhaustively listed.
Read the analysisIn an order of 5 December 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division stayed, at the parties' joint request, cost proceedings UPC_CFI_775/2025, 776/2025 and 777/2025 between Edwards Lifesciences and the Meril group (EP 3 769 722) pending the decision of the…
Read the analysisThe Milan Central Division ordered EOFLOW to pay a penalty of EUR 150,000 for violating the preliminary injunction granted by the Court of Appeal on 30 April 2025, on the basis of evidence that EOFLOW had exported 11,520 insulin pump devices to…
Read the analysisIn an order of 19 November 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the release to Bekaert Binjiang Steel Cord of the expert report drawn up after the inspection carried out on 11 November 2024 at the premises of…
Read the analysisIn an order of 23 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_342/2025), issued in Italian, the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division organised access to the documents gathered when a seizure to preserve evidence was executed for 3V Sigma against ACEF and AGA.
Read the analysisBy a provisional order of 11 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_247/2025), the presiding judge of the Mannheim Local Division protected under Rule 262A the technical information in MediaTek Germany's Statement of Defence and revocation counterclaim on the operation of certain chips, in Huawei's infringement…
Read the analysisBy an additional order of 10 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024, App_35230/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division supplemented, by way of correction, the confidentiality order of 9 September 2025 in Ona Patents v Google Ireland (EP 2 263 098).
Read the analysisBy an order of 9 September 2025 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024 (App_35230/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division granted Ona Patents' confidentiality request covering its brief of 20 August 2025 and Exhibits KAP 21 to KAP 33, and…
Read the analysisBy order of 8 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_724/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division restricted to Suinno's managing director and representative access to the lawyers' invoices lodged by Microsoft in the cost proceedings concerning EP 2 671 173.
Read the analysisBy an order of 26 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_758/2024 and UPC_CFI_259/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with no objection from Hologic, granted the Siemens defendants' confidentiality application in the infringement action on EP 2 352 431 B1 and the counterclaim for revocation: information on…
Read the analysisBy an order of 26 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_472/2024, ORD_33090/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division classified as confidential the information on Dainese's financial situation filed in the security for costs application brought by the defendants, including Alpinestars.
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 21 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_248/2025, ORD_35006/2025), the presiding judge and rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Judge U. Voß) largely granted the confidentiality application lodged by Huawei on 15 August 2025 in its infringement action against MediaTek concerning…
Read the analysisBy order of 21 August 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismisses, without examining their substance, the confidentiality requests (Rule 262A RoP) filed by Kodak with its statements of grounds of appeal (UPC_CoA_312/2025 and UPC_CoA_333/2025) against the decisions of the…
Read the analysisBy procedural order of 12 August 2025, issued in American Wave Machines' action for infringement of EP 2 728 089 against Surftown, WhiteWater Era, WhiteWater West Industries and Endless Surf and in the joined counterclaims for revocation (UPC_CFI_837/2024, UPC_CFI_349/2025 and UPC_CFI_394/2025), the…
Read the analysisBy order of 4 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_140/2024 and UPC_CFI_658/2025, App_33044/2025), Judge Thomas, presiding judge and judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, classified as confidential the information highlighted in the application for a costs decision filed on 16 July 2025 by 10x…
Read the analysisBy order of 4 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_191/2025 and UPC_CFI_617/2025, ACT_10280/2025 and CC_32138/2025), the judge rapporteur of The Hague Local Division confirmed, on two applications by Moderna under Rule 262A RoP, the confidentiality regime agreed with Genevant Sciences and Arbutus Biopharma in the…
Read the analysisBy order of 1 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_254/2025, ACT_14180/2025, ORD_33620/2025), Judge Voß, presiding judge and judge rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, classified as confidential the information on licence negotiations between Huawei and the MediaTek group contained in MediaTek Germany's request for production…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 1 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_254/2025, ACT_14180/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division granted the confidentiality application of MediaTek Germany, defendant in Huawei Technologies' infringement action (EP 4 142 215).
Read the analysisBy order of 31 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_362/2025, ORD_33183/2025), the Paris Local Division (Presiding Judge Lignières as judge rapporteur, Judges Gillet and Kupecz) set the protection regime for confidential information produced by the patentee in Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo…
Read the analysisBy an order of 31 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_361/2025), the full panel of the Paris Local Division set the regime protecting the confidential information produced by Sun Patent Trust in its infringement action against three Vivo companies (EP 3 852 468).
Read the analysisBy order of 16 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_484/2025, ORD_27316/2025), the judge rapporteur Haedicke (Paris Central Division) ruled on the confidentiality of the cost figures contained in the application for a cost decision (Rule 151 RoP) filed by Kinexon after its revocation action against…
Read the analysisBy order of 15 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_846/2024, App_29243/2025), the judge rapporteur Kupecz (Munich Local Division) rejected the requests for protection of confidential information filed by the BioNTech and Pfizer companies, defendants to the infringement action under EP 2 401 365 brought by…
Read the analysisBy order of 15 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_181/2025, App_27426/2025), the judge rapporteur Schumacher (Düsseldorf Local Division) set the protection regime for confidential information produced by bioMérieux S.A.
Read the analysisBy an order of 18 June 2025 (UPC_CFI_504/2023, EP 1 970 677), Judge-rapporteur Schumacher (Düsseldorf Local Division) granted, without opposition, the application by Rubin Medical, the sixth defendant, to protect the unredacted settlement agreement concluded with F.
Read the analysisOn Insulet's application in its claim against EOFLOW for the costs of the provisional measures proceedings on EP 4 201 327, the judge rapporteur of the Milan Central Division partly protected the fee evidence filed.
Read the analysisThe judge rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division dismissed NUC Electronics Europe and WARMCOOK's confidentiality request concerning the information they were ordered to provide to Hurom by the merits decision of 11 March 2025 (EP 2 028 981) and had lodged with…
Read the analysisBy procedural order of 20 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division granted the application for protection of confidential information filed by three of the defendants (Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care Europe and Rubin Medical) in the…
Read the analysisBy order of 16 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division protected, in the provisional measures proceedings brought by DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US against Greenchemicals under EP 1 957 544 B1 (UPC_CFI_203/2025), financial information contained in the applicant's…
Read the analysisBy order of 6 May 2025, the judge rapporteur Thomas (Düsseldorf Local Division) classified as confidential, in Ona Patents' infringement action on EP 2 263 098 against the Apple companies and the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024), the highlighted information in…
Read the analysisThe regime reserved to external counsel and experts only is rejected. Article 58 UPCA and Rule 262A require a fair balance between the parties’ opposing interests, and Rule 262A.6, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal on 12 February 2025, requires that…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 April 2025 (no. 69253/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division set up the protection of confidential information filed by ASUSTeK in Ericsson's infringement action based on EP 3 076 673 (UPC_CFI_319/2024) and in the counterclaim for revocation…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 April 2025 (ORD_20073/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division ruled on the protection of confidential information filed by ASUSTeK in Ericsson's infringement action UPC_CFI_318/2024 and in the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_730/2024.
Read the analysisBy procedural order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_519/2024, UPC_CFI_47/2025 and UPC_CFI_52/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential under Art.
Read the analysisBy order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_537/2024, ORD_13311/2025), Judge-rapporteur Schilling of the Hamburg Local Division confirmed as final the preliminary order of 18 March 2025 protecting under Rule 262A the sales and profit figures filed by Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisBy an order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_16/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential the information on the work billed by Ortovox Sportartikel's lawyers (invoice numbers, hourly rates, hours) in the applications for the determination of costs it…
Read the analysisBy order of 17 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_815/2024, ORD_13125/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (M. Zigann), dealing with Edwards Lifesciences' application for a cost decision (Rule 151) against Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences in the dispute over EP 3 646…
Read the analysisBy order of 10 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_846/2024, ACT_68533/2024, ORD_6596/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (A. Kupecz) largely granted the application of Promosome, claimant in an infringement action on EP 2 401 365 against five BioNTech group companies and four Pfizer…
Read the analysisAccess by a person to highly confidential information is assessed in light of that person’s role in the proceedings before the Court, the relevance of the information to that role and the trust the person inspires (para.
Read the analysisConfidentiality orders issued at first instance and not challenged on appeal continue to have effect during the appeal proceedings, including after the close of the proceedings (paras.
Read the analysisBy order of 14 January 2025, Presiding Judge Matthias Zigann, acting as judge-rapporteur of panel 1 of the Munich Local Division, ruled on Sanofi's application to protect the witness statement filed as Exhibit D.4 in its infringement actions on EP 2 493…
Read the analysisBy order of 9 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_769/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that A. Menarini Diagnostics’ confidentiality request in Insulet’s appeal against the Milan Local Division’s refusal of provisional measures (EP 4 201 327) was superfluous.
Read the analysisBy order of 23 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_826/2024), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal granted Microsoft’s application for Exhibit BP 01, filed with its request for discretionary review in its dispute with Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing (EP 2 671…
Read the analysisBy an order of 23 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_336/2024 and UPC_CFI_605/2024), Presiding Judge Thomas, as judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, ruled on confidentiality in Maxeon Solar's action for infringement of EP 3 065 184 against eight defendants, three Aiko companies among them…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_460/2024, ACT_44736/2024, App_60286/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judge Thomas), in Valeo Electrification's infringement action on EP 3 320 604 B1 against Magna PT B.V.
Read the analysisBy order of 19 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_169/2024, ACT_19012/2024, ORD_53958/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division (S.
Read the analysisBy order of 14 November 2024, issued in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_114/2024 and UPC_CFI_448/2024, the Munich Local Division ruled on the confidentiality applications of Vibrantz, the defendant in the infringement action brought by Heraeus Electronics and Heraeus Precious Metals on EP 3…
Read the analysisBy order of 24 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_22/2023, ACT_460565/2023, ORD_49363/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division (S. Klepsch), in the infringement action on EP 4 108 782 brought by 10x Genomics and President and Fellows of Harvard College against Vizgen, restricted access…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 20 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024, ACT_37931/2024, App_51893/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential, under Art.
Read the analysisBy order of 30 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_99/2024, ACT_11910/2024, App_43001/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas) granted the confidentiality request filed by Apple Inc.
Read the analysisBy order of 21 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024, ACT_37931/2024, App_46219/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas) declared confidential information contained in the objection filed by the Magna companies and in two of its exhibits, in the provisional measures…
Read the analysis