Opens in a new tab

Yangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 2 September 2026)

Date2 September 2026
CourtCFI
DivisionDüsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of actionInfringement Action
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_1034/2025
Registry referenceUPC-CFI-0001034/2025
PartiesYangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Europe Ltd., Micron Semiconductor (Deutschland) GmbH, Micron Semicond…

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

By order of 2 September 2026 (UPC_CFI_1034/2025 and UPC_CFI_931/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, on an application by Yangtze Memory Technologies in its infringement action on EP 3 909 047 against four Micron companies, referred to the panel, for decision at the latest after the oral hearing, the request to disregard new arguments in the rejoinder as late-filed, and allowed Yangtze Memory to respond in writing, by 17 September 2026, to the prior use argument based on the Z01M die. The order shows Rule 36 RoP being used to secure the right to be heard on points raised at the end of the written procedure.

Question

Must the judge-rapporteur rule at once on the admissibility of new arguments raised in a rejoinder and, pending that ruling, may he allow a further exchange of written pleadings under Rule 36 RoP?

Decision

The Rule 9.2 request calls for an in-depth analysis and was referred to the panel, which will decide at the latest after the oral hearing. The request to prevent reliance on those arguments at the hearing was bound to fail (paragraphs 15 and 16). As the arguments had not been disregarded at this stage, the Rule 36 request had to be decided (paragraph 17). Having regard to the right to be heard, fairness and efficiency, leave was granted as a precautionary measure, since the arguments first appeared in the rejoinder (paragraphs 18 to 20).

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Rules of Procedure
Rules 9.2 and 36
Case law cited
ZTE v Samsung, Mannheim Local Division, 13 January 2026, Dai Nippon v Zapp, Düsseldorf Local Division, 28 April 2026, Oppo v Panasonic, Court of Appeal, 24 September 2024.

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Decisions in the same proceedings

Going further

Lexicon: Patent infringement action.

Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_1034/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 1 April 2026 Yangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 1 April 2026) Application RoP262A · UPC_CFI_1034/2025

    L'estimation de bénéfice brut 2026 de Micron pour la France et l'Allemagne est protégée au titre de l'article 58 de l'Accord et des règles 262.2 et 262A, l'accès étant réservé aux représentants de Yangtze Memory et à quatre de ses salariés, sous astreinte en cas de violation.

  2. 17 August 2026 Yangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 17 August 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_1034/2025

    Saisie par Micron d'une demande de protection d'informations techniques sur la puce Z01M, produites au soutien d'un droit de possession antérieure, la division locale refuse l'accès réservé aux seuls avocats (§ 16 à 26). Seule la partie dont l'accès serait restreint peut renoncer au droit que lui confère la règle 262A.…

  3. 2 September 2026 Yangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 2 September 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_1034/2025

What the record states

Nature of the act
Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
La demande d'écarter les arguments nouveaux de la duplique de Micron est renvoyée à la formation. Yangtze Memory est autorisée à répondre par écrit sur la possession antérieure avant le 17 septembre 2026.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

PublicationRole in the disputeFamilyStandard and declarationPoolSources
EP 3 909 047Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified)
Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): Yangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 11 May 2026) · Yangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 1 April 2026)
not recordednot recordednot recordedEspacenet
links not checked
mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.