Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 21 August 2024)
| Date | 21 August 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application RoP262A |
| Registry reference | App_46219/2024 · ORD_46902/2024 |
| Parties | Magna International France, SARL, Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG, Magna PT s.r.o. v. Valeo Electrification |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 21 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024, ACT_37931/2024, App_46219/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas) declared confidential information contained in the objection filed by the Magna companies and in two of its exhibits, in the provisional measures proceedings brought by Valeo Electrification on EP 3 320 602. He dismissed Valeo’s request to lift the preliminary confidentiality order.
Question
May information be protected under Art. 58 UPCA where the applicant argues that it was already filed in earlier national proceedings?
Decision
Yes, where the conditions are met. Art. 9 of Directive (EU) 2016/943, implemented by Art. 58 UPCA and Rule 262A RoP, allows access to trade secrets to be restricted (paragraph 1), and the formal requirements are met, Valeo having been heard (paragraph 2). Magna shows, by reference to customer contracts, that the information has commercial value, is not generally known or visible to third parties and has been subject to confidentiality measures. The objection based on 2023 proceedings before the Stuttgart Regional Court fails: the information is different, what matters is the content of the affidavits rather than who submitted them, and public discussion of the same information is not shown (paragraph 3). The circle of authorised persons follows the order of 8 August 2024, which was not disputed (paragraph 4), authorised persons are bound by non-use and non-disclosure obligations, with a penalty for culpable breach.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: earlier filing of material in national proceedings does not defeat protection under Art. 58 UPCA if the content differs and public disclosure is not established.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 58
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 262.2 and 262A
- Directive (EU) 2016/943
- Art. 9(1) and (2)(a)
- Case law cited
- Avago Technologies International v Tesla Germany, Hamburg Local Division, 3 November 2023, 10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience, Düsseldorf Local Division, 11 March 2024, Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics, Düsseldorf Local Division, 8 August 2024
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Confidentiality club.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- defendantValeo Electrification18 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantMagna International France, SARL12 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantMagna PT s.r.o12 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantMagna PT B.V. & Co. KG12 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application RoP262A
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Les informations désignées par Magna sont déclarées confidentielles, l'accès étant limité à un cercle défini, et la demande de Valeo de lever l'ordonnance provisoire de confidentialité est rejetée.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 320 602mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- 10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 8 August 2024) cited in this record
- 10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 11 March 2024) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 November 2023) cited in this record
- Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, ORD_60319/2024, 23 December 2024) cites this decision
- Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, ORD_57608/2024, 23 December 2024) cites this decision
- Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 28 November 2024) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 320 602Rotary electric machine provided with a reservoir of lubricant for lubricating a rolling bearing and for cooling the machine recorded proprietor: Valeo Equipements Electriques Moteur SAS | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 11 other decision(s): Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, ORD_56545/2024, 31 October 2024 · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CoA, ORD_68769/2024, 13 January 2025 · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, ORD_68626/2024, 10 January 2025 · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 12 December 2024) · Magna International France v Valeo Electrification (CoA, 11 December 2 · Magna PT v Valeo Electrification (CoA, 21 November 2024) · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, ORD_60265/2024, 20 November 202 · Magna International France v Valeo Electrification (CoA, 14 November 2 | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.