Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, ORD_60319/2024, 23 December 2024)
| Date | 23 December 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_59980/2024 · ORD_60319/2024 |
| Parties | PowerDeal SRL, Coenergia Srl a Socio Unico |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By an order of 23 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_336/2024), Presiding Judge Thomas, as judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, classified as confidential, in Maxeon Solar’s action for infringement of EP 3 065 184, the revenue, profit and sales figures of PowerDeal and Coenergia set out in the statement of defence and counterclaim for revocation of five defendants, together with Exhibits Aff3 and Aff4. The order admits a confidentiality request made after the documents were lodged, which is of direct practical interest.
Question
Is a confidentiality request that was not lodged together with the pleading, as Rule 262A.3 requires, admissible?
Decision
Yes. Although the formal requirements of Rule 262A.3 were not met, Rule 262.2 does not require the request to be made at the same time as the pleading. The request was therefore admissible (paragraph 2). The data reveal the profitability of the attacked products and the market position of the two companies, and the defendants explained in detail why they are neither generally known nor readily accessible: they are trade secrets (paragraph 3), protected on the basis of Article 9 of Directive 2016/943, Art. 58 UPCA and Rule 262A (paragraph 1). The request did not seek to restrict the claimant’s access. Requests concerning public access (Rule 262.1(b)), the oral hearing and the reasons of the judgment were reserved (paragraph 5).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: a late confidentiality request remains possible under Rule 262.2, but must explain precisely why the data are secret.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 58
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 262 and 262A
- Directive (EU) 2016/943
- Art. 9(1) and (2)(a)
- Case law cited
- Hamburg Local Division, Avago International Sales v Tesla Germany, 3 November 2023 (UPC_CFI_54/2023), Düsseldorf Local Division, 10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience, 11 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_463/2023), Düsseldorf Local Division, Magna International France v Valeo Electrification, 21 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024), Düsseldorf Local Division, Valeo v Magna, 9 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024)
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantCoenergia Srl a Socio Unico3 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantPowerDeal SRL4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Les chiffres d'affaires, bénéfices et ventes de PowerDeal et Coenergia et les pièces Aff3 et Aff4 sont classés confidentiels, la demande tardive étant recevable au titre de la règle 262.2.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 065 184mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 21 August 2024) cited in this record
- 10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 11 March 2024) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 November 2023) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 065 184Trench process and structure for backside contact solar cells with polysilicon doped regions recorded proprietor: Maxeon Solar Pte Ltd | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 11 other decision(s): Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 11 February 2026) · Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 29 July 2025) · Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 23 April 2025) · Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 14 April 2025) · Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 13 April 2025) · Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 19 February 2025) · Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 3 February 2025) · Maxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 21 January 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.