Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_318/2024, 21 September 2026)
| Date | 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Milan (IT) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_318/2024, UPC_CFI_730/2024 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_318/2024 |
| Parties | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc.; Arvato Netherlands B.V. |
| Language | English |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 4 November 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In an order of 21 September 2026 published on 29 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_318/2024 and UPC_CFI_730/2024), judge-rapporteur Alima Zana of the Milan Local Division sets the conduct of the hearing of 24 and 25 September 2026 in Ericsson’s action against ASUSTek and Arvato Netherlands. The first day covers the two patents in suit, with one hour of pleading per side and per patent and fifteen minutes of reply, after a short joint introduction. The second day is devoted entirely to the FRAND defence and remedies, with one hour and thirty minutes per side and forty-five minutes of reply, the whole discussion being subject to the confidentiality regime and access limited to persons authorised by the earlier orders. Slides may contain no new arguments and must be exchanged the day before.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 105.5 and 262A
Related decisions
- Milan Local Division, 24 August 2026, Ericsson v ASUSTek: related proceedings between the same parties
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 4 November 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: FRAND licence, Standard essential patent (SEP), Confidentiality club, Oral procedure and hearing (UPC)
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- English from the language of proceedings
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson34 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantASUSTeK Computer Inc.26 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantArvato Netherlands B.V.9 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division locale de Milan organise l’audience des 24 et 25 septembre 2026 entre Ericsson et ASUSTek en consacrant entièrement la seconde journée à la défense FRAND et aux mesures, sous régime de confidentialité intégral.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 24 August 2026) cited in this record
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.