Opens in a new tab

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_319/2024, 21 September 2026)

Date21 September 2026
CourtCFI
DivisionMilan (IT) Local Division
Type of actionInfringement Action
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_319/2024, UPC_CFI_728/2024
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_319/2024
PartiesTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc.; Arvato Netherlands B.V.
LanguageEnglish

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 4 November 2026

Our analysis

Summary

In an order of 21 September 2026 published on 29 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_319/2024 and UPC_CFI_728/2024), presiding judge and judge-rapporteur Pierluigi Perrotti of the Milan Local Division sets the conduct of the hearing of 24 and 25 September 2026 in Ericsson’s action against ASUSTek and Arvato Netherlands. The first day covers the two patents in suit, with one hour of pleading per side and per patent and fifteen minutes of reply, after a short joint introduction. The second day is devoted entirely to the FRAND defence and remedies, with one hour and thirty minutes per side and forty-five minutes of reply, the whole discussion being subject to the confidentiality regime and access limited to persons authorised by the earlier orders. Slides may contain no new arguments and must be exchanged the day before.

Provisions applied

Rules of Procedure
Rules 105.5 and 262A

Related decisions

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 4 November 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Going further

Lexicon: FRAND licence, Standard essential patent (SEP), Confidentiality club, Oral procedure and hearing (UPC)

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
English from the language of proceedings
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_319/2024 official number
  • UPC_CFI_728/2024 official number

Follow these proceedings

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
La division locale de Milan organise l’audience des 24 et 25 septembre 2026 entre Ericsson et ASUSTek en consacrant entièrement la seconde journée à la défense FRAND et aux mesures, sous régime de confidentialité intégral.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.