DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US v Greenchemicals (CFI, 16 May 2025)
| Date | 16 May 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application RoP262A |
| Registry reference | App_14117/2025 · ORD_19868/2025 |
| Parties | Greenchemicals S.R.L. v. DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US, LLC. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 16 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division protected, in the provisional measures proceedings brought by DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US against Greenchemicals under EP 1 957 544 B1 (UPC_CFI_203/2025), financial information contained in the applicant’s comments and in an exhibit. The order refused the defendant’s request to drop the threat of a penalty payment for culpable breach of confidentiality.
Question
Can the defendant have the confidentiality order stripped of any sanction on the ground that the information, prices in particular, was already known to it through a licensee?
Decision
The judge rejected Greenchemicals’ arguments: if the information is already known, the order’s exception for information obtained from an unbound third-party source will apply, with no need to waive the sanction. The defendant had not shown that the information was public, even though it had bought products from a licensee, DDP stating that its licensees do not disclose agreed prices to their customers. Access on the defendant’s side was limited to its representatives to be appointed and one employee of its administrative department. The obligation survives the end of the proceedings and representatives are liable for breaches by their team. Confidentiality towards third parties must be sought through the proper CMS workflow.
Key points for practice
- The threat of a penalty payment remains attached to the confidentiality order: prior knowledge of the information is dealt with through the independent source exception, which the party relying on it must prove.
- Practical point: confidentiality towards third parties requires a separate request through the dedicated CMS workflow.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 58
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 262.2 and 262A
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Confidentiality club.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- defendantDDP Specialty Electronic Materials US, LLC2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantGreenchemicals S.R.LFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application RoP262A
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le juge rapporteur classe confidentielles des informations financières de DDP, limite l'accès côté défenderesse et maintient la menace d'astreinte en cas de violation fautive.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 1 957 544 B1mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 1 957 544 B1 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 1 other decision(s): DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US v Greenchemicals (CFI, 28 July 2 | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.