Infringement
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Infringement" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Compare two parties or two issues
483 decisions recorded
Ecovacs Robotics v Roborock Germany (CFI, 3 July 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 2 July 2026)
By order of 2 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division acknowledges that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has complied with Rule 118.8 RoP in respect of all the orders in the decision of 6 May 2026, with effect from 15 June…
Read the analysisCureVac Manufacturing v Moderna (CFI, UPC_CFI_1407/2026, 1 July 2026)
By order of 1 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division dismisses CureVac Manufacturing GmbH’s Rule 190 RoP application for Moderna to produce extracts from its CTD dossier and technical data sheets on an RNA manufacturing process, and confirms the…
Read the analysisValeo Electrification v SEG Automotive Germany (CFI, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division admits KSR International Inc. and its subsidiary Automotive Technical Advisory Service GmbH as interveners in support of the defendants in Valeo Electrification’s infringement action on EP 3 157 142…
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 26 June 2026)
By order of 26 June 2026 (“Order II”), made in infringement action UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_629/2026 concerning EP 3 107 487, the Brussels Local Division rules on the second application for production of evidence brought by the GC Aesthetics defendants…
Read the analysisKEEEX v Adobe Systems Software Ireland (CFI, 25 June 2026)
In an order of 25 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_530/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division rules on the objections raised by Adobe, OpenAI and the other defendants against the brief filed on 5 June 2026 by KEEEX, proprietor of EP 2 949…
Read the analysisNokia Technologies v Acer (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_293/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_868/2025 (counterclaim for revocation) concerning EP 2 661 892, the Munich Local Division allows the mutual withdrawals of Nokia Technologies Oy and of the defendants Acer, Inc., Acer Computer GmbH and CPYou B.V., five days…
Read the analysisIllumina v Element Biosciences (CFI, 22 June 2026)
Read the French analysisEvac v Shanghai VacDrain Vaccuum Drainage Equipment (CFI, 22 June 2026)
In a decision of 22 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_811/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division holds partly well-founded Evac Oy's infringement action, based on two patents for vacuum sewer systems (EP 1 840 282 and EP 1 813 734), against the Chinese manufacturer Shanghai VacDrain,…
Read the analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v Motorola Mobility (CFI, 18 June 2026)
In the action for infringement of EP 3 016 464 brought by Advanced Standard Communication LLC against Motorola Mobility LLC and three other defendants, the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants Rule 262A protection for information in the rejoinder on the…
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v C.P. Pharmaceuticals International C.V. (CFI, 17 June 2026)
In the action for infringement of EP 2 590 626 brought by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA against thirty Pfizer and BioNTech group companies (UPC_CFI_620/2025) and the joined counterclaims for revocation (UPC_CFI_1509/2025 and UPC_CFI_1511/2025), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division prepares the oral…
Read the analysisOrange v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_301/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisBostik v Henkel France (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisAlbert Handtmann Maschinenfabrik v VEMAG Maschinenbau (CFI, UPC_CFI_184/2025, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysisInterDigital VC Holdings v The Walt Disney Company (CFI, 16 June 2026)
Read the French analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_29/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 15 June 2026)
In proceedings UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 brought by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysis2seventy bio v Johnson & Johnson (CFI, UPC_CFI_1934/2026, 15 June 2026)
Read the French analysisIrdeto v DJI Europe . (CFI, 12 June 2026)
Open the entryGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, UPC_CFI_616/2025, 12 June 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_616/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_1439/2025 (counterclaim for revocation) between GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and Moderna Netherlands B.V.
Read the analysisHologic v Siemens Healthineers (CFI, 10 June 2026)
In a decision of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_758/2024 and UPC_CFI_259/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division rules on the infringement action brought by Hologic, Inc. against four Siemens Healthineers companies under EP 2 352 431 (breast tomosynthesis system controlling the X-ray focal spot), directed…
Read the analysisNixu FL IP Protection v Infoblox (CFI, 10 June 2026)
In an order of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_360/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division orders Nixu FL IP Protection to provide security of EUR 200,000 for the costs of Infoblox Inc., Infoblox Germany GmbH and Nomios Germany GmbH, sued for infringement…
Read the analysisFERRING v ACCORD HEALTHCARE (CFI, 9 June 2026)
Read the French analysisNixu FL IP Protection v Infoblox (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In an order of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_360/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division partly allows the preliminary objection on international jurisdiction raised by Infoblox Inc., a US company sued by Nixu FL IP Protection alongside two German-domiciled defendants for infringement…
Read the analysisSanofi Biotechnologies v Amgen (CFI, 8 June 2026)
The Düsseldorf Local Division lifts the stay to allow the withdrawals by Sanofi Biotechnologies SAS and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (action for infringement of EP 4 252 857, UPC_CFI_195/2025) and by the Amgen companies (counterclaim for revocation), filed in March 2026 with the…
Read the analysisAlign v Angelalign (CFI, 5 June 2026)
Read the French analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics ParentCo (CFI, UPC_CFI_1357/2025, 4 June 2026)
By an order of 4 June 2026 in infringement action UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_629/2026 concerning EP 3 107 487, the Brussels Local Division grants Establishment Labs S.A.
Read the analysisSun Patent Trust v LYNK & CO International (CFI, 3 June 2026)
In a decision of 3 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1661/2025), the Hamburg Local Division permits, with the consent of the seven defendants (LYNK & CO International AB, Zeekr, Lotus and Smart Europe companies), the withdrawal of the infringement action brought by Sun Patent Trust…
Read the analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_502/2024, 2 June 2026)
By an order of 2 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division stays infringement action UPC_CFI_502/2024 brought by Koninklijke KPN N.V. against Oleading B.V.
Read the analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_2246/2025, 2 June 2026)
By order of 2 June 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division granted the joint request of KPN and Oleading and others to vary the order of 28 May 2026 (Rule 335 RoP).
Read the analysisBoa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_996/2025, 1 June 2026)
In an order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_996/2025, with UPC_CFI_737/2026 and UPC_CFI_742/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses the EUR 200,000 security for costs application filed by Shinkyung Inc.
Read the analysisFraunhofer-Gesellschaft v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_494/2025, 1 June 2026)
In a document of 1 June 2026 combining the summary of the interim conference with a procedural order, issued in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_494/2025 and UPC_CFI_495/2025 (with counterclaims for revocation), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division prepares the oral hearing of…
Read the analysisBoa v Shinkyung (CFI, UPC_CFI_998/2025, 1 June 2026)
By order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_998/2025, UPC_CFI_738/2026 and UPC_CFI_743/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed the application for security for costs of EUR 200,000 brought by Shinkyung against Boa Technology, proprietor of EP 3 777 595, in its infringement…
Read the analysisFraunhofer-Gesellschaft v HMD Global (CFI, UPC_CFI_495/2025, 1 June 2026)
Read the French analysisNokia Technologies v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 1 June 2026)
By a decision of 1 June 2026, following a settlement reached during the written procedure, the Munich Local Division allows Nokia Technologies Oy to withdraw infringement action UPC_CFI_661/2025 concerning EP 4 090 075, and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisBoa Technology v Zuatu Cycling International d.o.o. (CFI, 1 June 2026)
By order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1141/2025 and UPC_CFI_736/2026), the presiding judge, acting as judge-rapporteur, of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed the application for security for costs of EUR 200,000 brought by the defendants against Boa Technology, proprietor of EP 2 805…
Read the analysisKEEEX v ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND (CFI, 1 June 2026)
In an order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_530/2025), the panel of the Paris Local Division dismisses the request for review (Rule 333 RoP) filed by Adobe Systems Software Ireland and Adobe Inc.
Read the analysisNokia Solutions and Networks v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 29 May 2026)
By a decision of 29 May 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permits Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy to withdraw infringement action UPC_CFI_662/2025 concerning EP 3 799 333, and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisTIRU v VALINEA ENERGIE (CFI, 29 May 2026)
Open the entryHybridgenerator v HGSystem (CFI, 29 May 2026)
Read the French analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_565/2024, 28 May 2026)
By an order of 28 May 2026 in joined infringement actions UPC_CFI_565/2024 and UPC_CFI_2246/2025 brought by Koninklijke KPN N.V. against Oleading B.V., Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Renault Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_1292/2025, 28 May 2026)
Read the French analysisKoninklijke KPN v Oleading (CFI, UPC_CFI_2246/2025, 28 May 2026)
Read the French analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Renault Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2025, 28 May 2026)
By a decision of 28 May 2026, following a settlement, the Düsseldorf Local Division permits Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited to withdraw infringement action UPC_CFI_629/2025 concerning EP 3 651 429, and Renault Deutschland AG and the four other defendants to withdraw…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1791/2025, 27 May 2026)
Read the French analysisBMS Innovations v BYD (CFI, UPC_CFI_2228/2025, 27 May 2026)
By order of 27 May 2026 in UPC_CFI_2228/2025 and UPC_CFI_1546/2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division ordered BMS Innovations, which is suing several BYD group companies for infringement of EP3393001, to provide security of EUR 350,000 for the costs of the…
Read the analysisWonderland Nurserygoods v Cybex (CFI, UPC_CFI_807/2024, 27 May 2026)
In a decision of 27 May 2026, given in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_807/2024 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_334/2025 (counterclaim for revocation), the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses both Wonderland Nurserygoods' action against Cybex GmbH, Cybex Retail GmbH and Columbus Trading-Partners and the counterclaim against EP…
Read the analysisBMS Innovations v BYD (CFI, UPC_CFI_2070/2025, 27 May 2026)
By order of 27 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_2070/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division ordered BMS Innovations, claimant in the infringement action on EP 2937706 against six companies of the BYD group, to provide security for costs of EUR 300,000 within one…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1793/2025, 27 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 27 May 2026)
By an order of 27 May 2026 in infringement actions UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 brought by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings and nine other defendants, The Hague Local Division sets up a phased confidentiality regime for Ericsson's comparable licences…
Read the analysisBrita v Wessper (CFI, 27 May 2026)
By order of 27 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_779/2024), the presiding judge of the Düsseldorf Local Division, acting as judge-rapporteur, rejected applications by Wessper Sp.
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, UPC_CFI_850/2026, 26 May 2026)
By an order of 26 May 2026, the Lisbon Local Division dismisses the application by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) and three of its group companies to strike out, under Rules 360 and 361, the injunction requests made by Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysisPirelli Tyre v Tianjin Kingtyre Group (CFI, 26 May 2026)
By default decision of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_771/2024), the Milan Local Division held that Tianjin Kingtyre Group, which did not appear after service of the statement of claim in China on 2 July 2025, infringed Pirelli Tyre's patent EP 2 519 412…
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, UPC_CFI_850/2026, 26 May 2026, doc. 2)
By order of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_850/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division ordered Shenzhen Transsion, claimant in an infringement action on EP 4 123 910 against four Ericsson companies, to provide security for costs of EUR 100,000 within 21 days,…
Read the analysisPIRELLI TYRE v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, UPC_CFI_770/2024, 26 May 2026)
By decision of 26 May 2026 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_770/2024 (infringement action) and UPC_CFI_556/2025 (counterclaim for revocation), the Milan Local Division ruled on Pirelli Tyre's action against Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber on EP 3 519 207, concerning a motorcycle tyre.
Read the analysisSun Patent Trust v Vivo Mobile Communication Iberia (CFI, UPC_CFI_362/2025, 22 May 2026)
By procedural order of 22 May 2026, following an online case management meeting held the day before, the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division amended the hearing dates in Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo companies based on EP 3…
Read the analysisEyesmatch v Google Ireland (CFI, 22 May 2026)
By procedural order of 22 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_808/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division, in Eyesmatch's infringement action on EP 4 184 443 against Google Ireland and Google Commerce, raised the provisional value of the dispute from EUR 2,000,000 to EUR…
Read the analysisSun Patent Trust v Vivo Mobile Communication Iberia (CFI, UPC_CFI_361/2025, 22 May 2026)
By procedural order of 22 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_361/2025) the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division amended the hearing dates in Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo companies, based on EP 3 852 468: a hearing on 9 September 2026 at…
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Renault Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_643/2026, 21 May 2026)
By order of 21 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_643/2026), the Hamburg Local Division permitted, with the defendants' consent, the withdrawal of the action for infringement of EP 2 184 891 by Avago Technologies International Sales Pte.
Read the analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, UPC_CFI_398/2025, 19 May 2026)
Read the French analysisBMS Innovations v BYD (CFI, 19 May 2026)
By order of 19 May 2026 in UPC_CFI_2228/2025 and UPC_CFI_1546/2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division, ruling on BYD's preliminary objection in BMS Innovations' infringement action on EP3393001, declined jurisdiction over BYD (U.K.), deferred to the main proceedings the objection concerning…
Read the analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, UPC_CFI_1321/2025, 19 May 2026)
Read the French analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, UPC_CFI_617/2024, 19 May 2026)
Read the French analysisAbbott Diabetes Care v Sinocare (CFI, 19 May 2026)
By order of 19 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_1613/2025 and UPC_CFI_943/2026), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division deferred to the main proceedings the preliminary objection raised by Sinocare Inc and the other defendants in Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.'s action for infringement of EP…
Read the analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, UPC_CFI_1340/2026, 19 May 2026)
Read the French analysisBARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbB v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, 18 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1793/2025, 14 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1568/2025, 14 May 2026)
By order of 14 May 2026, issued in the three infringement actions UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 brought by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1791/2025, 14 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1793/2025, 13 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 13 May 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 (EP 2 712 236, EP 3 836 631 and EP 3 245 744), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division refuses the Transsion defendants an extension of the deadline for their non-technical statement of…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1791/2025, 13 May 2026)
Read the French analysisAvient Protective Materials v Xingi (CFI, 11 May 2026)
In an order of 11 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_478/2025 and UPC_CFI_585/2026), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division partly grants Avient Protective Materials' application for production of evidence (Rule 190 RoP) against the Xingi Group, in an infringement action on EP 2 791…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_1793/2025, 8 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, UPC_CFI_11568/2025, 8 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 8 May 2026)
Following the case management hearing of 5 March 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division directs, in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_1568/2025, UPC_CFI_1791/2025 and UPC_CFI_1793/2025 between Ericsson and Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, UPC_CFI_616/2025, 7 May 2026)
In the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_616/2025 and UPC_CFI_1439/2025 concerning EP 2 590 626, held by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division dismisses two applications: GSK's request for five party experts to be heard in person, and Moderna's third request…
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Moderna Netherlands (CFI, UPC_CFI_1439/2025, 7 May 2026)
Read the French analysisOmnia Technologies v Sidel Participations (CFI, 7 May 2026)
In an order of 7 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_799/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division dismisses Sidel Participations' preliminary objection to the action for a declaration of non-infringement brought on 3 March 2026 by Omnia Technologies, ACMI and ACMI Labelling over EP…
Read the analysisSILIMED Indústria de Implantes Ltda v Polytech Health & Aesthetics (CFI, 7 May 2026)
In an order of 7 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_481/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division upholds the defendants' preliminary objections and dismisses as inadmissible SILIMED's infringement action against Polytech Health & Aesthetics and seven other defendants, since the UPC lacks competence over…
Read the analysisHorl 1993 v Magna-Tec e.K (CFI, 6 May 2026)
In a decision of 6 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_388/2025), the Hamburg Local Division rules on Horl 1993's infringement action against Magna-Tec concerning the 'Trinity-S' knife sharpener, under the unitary patent EP 4 117 857 B1 (roller sharpener).
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 6 May 2026)
In a decision of 6 May 2026 given in the joined infringement action and counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_757/2024 and UPC_CFI_539/2025), the Lisbon Local Division held that ASUSTek Computer infringed Ericsson’s EP 2 819 131 (an inductor arrangement reducing oscillator coupling), which expired…
Read the analysisMaxell v Samsung Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_196/2025, 5 May 2026)
Following the interim conference of 30 April 2026 in infringement action UPC_CFI_196/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_665/2025 concerning EP 2 403 266, held by Maxell, Ltd., the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division sets the value of the proceedings and organises the…
Read the analysisHurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_159/2024, 5 May 2026)
In an order of 5 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_159/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permits Hurom to withdraw its requests for penalty payments against NUC Electronics Europe and WARMCOOK (EP 2 028 981), made in enforcement proceedings (Rule 354.4 RoP) that…
Read the analysisAgathon v Intercom (CFI, 5 May 2026)
In a decision of 5 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_727/2024 and UPC_CFI_493/2025), the Milan Local Division rules on Agathon's infringement action against Intercom (manufacturer) and Knarr Vertriebs (distributor) on EP 2 363 263 B1 (centring device for a forming tool), and on Intercom's counterclaim…
Read the analysisDyson Technology v Dreame International (Hongkong) (CFI, 4 May 2026)
In an order of 4 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_851/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division refuses, for the time being, to stay Dyson's infringement action against Dreame and five other defendants (EP 3 119 235), whether pending the Court of Appeal's preliminary…
Read the analysisDolby International v CPYou (CFI, UPC_CFI_1536/2025, 1 May 2026)
At the defendants' request, and with no objection from Dolby International AB or the intervener Vectis IP Ltd., the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division corrects an obvious error in the order of 1 May 2026 in proceedings UPC_CFI_1536/2025, UPC_CFI_982/2026 and UPC_CFI_1168/2026…
Read the analysisDolby International v CPYou (CFI, UPC_CFI_1536/2025, 1 May 2026, doc. 2)
By order of 8 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_1536/2025, UPC_CFI_982/2026 and UPC_CFI_1168/2026), the panel of The Hague Local Division dismissed the request for review under Rule 333 RoP of the judge-rapporteur's order of 1 May 2026, which had held admissible Acer's counterclaim for rate-setting…
Read the analysisDolby International v CPYou (CFI, UPC_CFI_1536/2025, 1 May 2026, doc. 3)
Read the French analysisDolby International v CPYou (CFI, 30 April 2026)
By procedural order of 30 April 2026, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division records the exchanges at the case management hearing held online and behind closed doors on 23 February 2026 in the infringement action brought by Dolby International AB against…
Read the analysisCanon Kabushiki Kaisha v Katun Germany (CFI, UPC_CFI_351/2024, 30 April 2026)
In an order of 30 April 2026 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_351/2024 and UPC_CFI_595/2024, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division dismisses the confidentiality application filed by Katun and General Plastic after the decision on the merits of 11 February 2026, concerning…
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 30 April 2026)
The Düsseldorf Local Division orders that 50% of the court fees paid in infringement action UPC_CFI_1648/2025 (EP 1 954 091), namely EUR 7,500, be reimbursed to Avago Technologies International Sales Pte.
Read the analysisIQIP v TMS Technical & Maritime Supplies (CFI, UPC_CFI_721/2025, 29 April 2026)
In an order of 29 April 2026 in the infringement action UPC_CFI_721/2025 and the counterclaim UPC_CFI_1695/2025, the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division partly grants TMS's request for production of evidence under Rule 190 RoP.
Read the analysisIQIP v TMS Technical & Maritime Supplies (CFI, UPC_CFI_1695/2025, 29 April 2026)
Read the French analysisAIM Sport Development v TGI Sport Suomi (CFI, UPC_CFI_214/2023, 29 April 2026)
By decision of 29 April 2026, given in infringement action UPC_CFI_214/2023 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_403/2025, the Helsinki Local Division dismisses both: AIM Sport Development AG’s patent EP 3 295 663 is upheld as granted, but TGI Sport’s SVB System infringes it…
Read the analysisCUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb v ALPINA Coffee Systems (CFI, UPC_CFI_52/2025, 28 April 2026)
Read the French analysisCUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb v ALPINA Coffee Systems (CFI, UPC_CFI_47/2025, 28 April 2026)
In a procedural order of 28 April 2026 in the infringement action UPC_CFI_47/2025 and the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_68/2025 (EP 3 281 569), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division sets out, under Rule 332 RoP, how CUP&CINO and ALPINA must restructure…
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 27 April 2026)
By order of 27 April 2026 (UPC_CFI_140/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division orders the release of the EUR 200,000 security that Curio Bioscience Inc. deposited in the UPC security account under the order of 3 December 2024.
Read the analysisElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute v Hisense Gorenje Germany (CFI, 27 April 2026)
In a decision of 27 April 2026 (UPC_CFI_716/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division corrects of its own motion, under Rule 353 RoP, section V of the operative part of its decision of 16 February 2026 in the dispute between ETRI and Hisense Gorenje…
Read the analysis