Advanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, UPC_CFI_1321/2025, 19 May 2026)

Date	19 May 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_1321/2025
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_1321/2025
Parties	Advanced Standard Communication LLC v. XIAOMI Inc. a.o.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

11 June 2026 : Advanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, 11 June 2026) UPC-CFI-1321/2025

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_1321/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantAdvanced Standard Communication LLC9 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantXIAOMI Inc. a.o6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

19 May 2026 Advanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, UPC_CFI_1321/2025, 19 May 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_1321/2025
11 June 2026 Advanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, 11 June 2026) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_1321/2025
Le délai de réplique et de défense à la demande reconventionnelle est prorogé de deux jours seulement. La prorogation de deux semaines est rejetée.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Advanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, 11 June 2026) cited in this record
Advanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, UPC_CFI_398/2025, 19 May 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.