Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_159/2024, 5 May 2026)

Date	5 May 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Mannheim (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_159/2024
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_159/2024
Parties	Hurom Co., Ltd. v. NUC Electronics Co., Ltd. and WARMCOOK

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

2 October 2025 : Hurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, 2 October 2025) UPC_CFI_159/2024

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_159/2024 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantHurom Co., Ltd.18 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantNUC Electronics Co., Ltd. and WARMCOOK2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

6 June 2025 Hurom v NUC Electronics (CoA, 6 June 2025) Application Rop 223 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
L'appel contre l'ordonnance d'information de l'article 67 de l'Accord ne reçoit pas d'effet suspensif, NUC n'ayant démontré ni erreur manifeste ni perte d'objet de l'appel ni intérêt de confidentialité prépondérant.
2 October 2025 Hurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, 2 October 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_159/2024
La division se reconnaît compétente pour les parties nationales d'États non membres de la JUB, constate la contrefaçon de la revendication 1 en Pologne, en Espagne et au Royaume-Uni selon les droits nationaux et rejette les demandes visant la Turquie.
27 March 2026 NUC Electronics Europe v Hurom (CoA, 27 March 2026) Appeal RoP220.1 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
Les ordonnances de Mannheim sont infirmées faute de reproduction de la caractéristique [1N], les demandes de Hurom sont rejetées sauf pour la Turquie, où l'irrecevabilité est confirmée, et Hurom supporte les frais des deux instances.
5 May 2026 Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_159/2024, 5 May 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_159/2024

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): Le désistement des demandes d'astreinte est autorisé, la procédure d'exécution est close et Hurom en supporte les frais.
Appeal: An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 2 028 981 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Hurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, 2 October 2025) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 2 028 981` Juice extractor recorded proprietor: Personne physique (déposant individuel)	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 16 other decision(s): Hurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, ORD_11865/2025, 11 March 2025) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, ORD_11863/2025, 11 March 2025) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CoA, 26 May 2026) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_336/2025, 5 May 2026) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_335/2025, 5 May 2026) · NUC Electronics Europe v Hurom (CoA, 27 March 2026) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, 2 October 2025) · Hurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, 2 October 2025)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.