Avago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 30 April 2026)
| Date | 30 April 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_1648/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_1648/2025 |
| Parties | Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v. Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 11 February 2026 : Avago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 11 February 2026) UPC_CFI_1648/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
The Düsseldorf Local Division orders that 50% of the court fees paid in infringement action UPC_CFI_1648/2025 (EP 1 954 091), namely EUR 7,500, be reimbursed to Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited, and dismisses the further request for 60%. The order settles a transitional question relevant to any action filed in 2025 and withdrawn in 2026.
Question
For an action filed on 19 November 2025 and withdrawn on 3 February 2026, before the closure of the written procedure, is reimbursement governed by the former Rule 370.9 or by the version applicable since 1 January 2026?
Decision
The division applies the amended Rule 370.9(b), which provides for 50% reimbursement where the action is withdrawn before the closure of the written procedure (paragraph 5). Article 5 of the Administrative Committee decision of 4 November 2025 makes the amended rules applicable to actions and applications filed after 31 December 2025 (paragraph 6). The relevant application is the application to withdraw of 3 February 2026, not the action itself, so the new text applies, as the Court of Appeal has held (paragraph 7).
Key points for practice
- The reimbursement regime depends on the date of the application to withdraw, not on the date on which the action was filed (paragraph 7).
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rule 370.9
- Case law cited
- Black Sheep Retail Products v HL Display, Court of Appeal, 6 March 2026
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Patent infringement action.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantAvago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited28 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantTelefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 11 February 2026 Avago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 11 February 2026) Withdrawal (RoP265) · UPC_CFI_1648/2025
La division locale de Düsseldorf autorise le désistement d'Avago, déclare la procédure close, constate qu'aucune décision sur les frais n'est nécessaire et fixe la valeur du litige à 1 000 000 euros.
- 30 April 2026 Avago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 30 April 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_1648/2025
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division ordonne le remboursement de 50 % des frais de justice, soit 7 500 EUR, et rejette la demande de 60 %, la règle 370.9 modifiée s'appliquant à la demande de désistement formée le 3 février 2026.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 1 954 091mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Black Sheep Retail Products v HL Display (CoA, 6 March 2026) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 11 February 2026) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 1 954 091 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 1 other decision(s): Avago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 11 F | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.