Application RoP262A
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Application RoP262A" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
102 decisions recorded
SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CFI, 21 May 2026)
Read the French analysisYangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 11 May 2026)
In an order of 11 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_1034/2025 and UPC_CFI_931/2026, EP 3 909 047), the Düsseldorf Local Division grants Yangtze Memory Technologies the confidentiality protection it sought for a TechInsights technical report (Exhibit BB 24) and for the passages of its reply…
Read the analysisYangtze Memory v Micron (CFI, 1 April 2026)
In a procedural order of 1 April 2026 (UPC_CFI_1034/2025 and UPC_CFI_931/2026), the Düsseldorf Local Division deals with Micron's request under Rule 262A RoP to protect its estimated 2026 gross profit from direct sales of the attacked products in Germany and France (EP…
Read the analysisDai Nippon Printing v Zapp (CFI, 18 February 2026)
Read the French analysisHuawei v HMD Global (CFI, 19 January 2026)
Non-public details of licence negotiations constitute confidential information within the meaning of Rule 262A, and protection may be extended in advance to all future pleadings relating to those negotiations, to avoid repeated orders, each party retaining the option to seek enhanced protection…
Read the analysisZTE v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 13 January 2026)
A licence agreement concluded with a third party is classified as highly confidential information, access being reserved to three designated persons of the claimant, its economic expert and that expert’s team, and the representatives registered in the parallel proceedings, exhaustively listed.
Read the analysisEDWARDS LIFESCIENCES v MERIL LIFE SCIENCES (CFI, 5 December 2025)
In an order of 5 December 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division stayed, at the parties' joint request, cost proceedings UPC_CFI_775/2025, 776/2025 and 777/2025 between Edwards Lifesciences and the Meril group (EP 3 769 722) pending the decision of the…
Read the analysisInsulet v EOFLOW (CFI, 4 December 2025)
The Milan Central Division ordered EOFLOW to pay a penalty of EUR 150,000 for violating the preliminary injunction granted by the Court of Appeal on 30 April 2025, on the basis of evidence that EOFLOW had exported 11,520 insulin pump devices to…
Read the analysisBekaert Binjiang Steel Cord v Siltronic (CFI, 19 November 2025)
In an order of 19 November 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the release to Bekaert Binjiang Steel Cord of the expert report drawn up after the inspection carried out on 11 November 2024 at the premises of…
Read the analysisF. Hoffmann-La Roche v A. Menarini Diagnostics (CFI, 1 October 2025)
Read the French analysis3V Sigma v ACEF (CFI, 23 September 2025)
In an order of 23 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_342/2025), issued in Italian, the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division organised access to the documents gathered when a seizure to preserve evidence was executed for 3V Sigma against ACEF and AGA.
Read the analysisHuawei Technologies v MediaTek (CFI, 11 September 2025)
By a provisional order of 11 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_247/2025), the presiding judge of the Mannheim Local Division protected under Rule 262A the technical information in MediaTek Germany's Statement of Defence and revocation counterclaim on the operation of certain chips, in Huawei's infringement…
Read the analysisOna Patents v Google Ireland (CFI, 10 September 2025)
By an additional order of 10 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024, App_35230/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division supplemented, by way of correction, the confidentiality order of 9 September 2025 in Ona Patents v Google Ireland (EP 2 263 098).
Read the analysisGoogle Commerce v Ona Patents (CFI, 9 September 2025)
By an order of 9 September 2025 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024 (App_35230/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division granted Ona Patents' confidentiality request covering its brief of 20 August 2025 and Exhibits KAP 21 to KAP 33, and…
Read the analysisMicrosoft v Suinno Mobile & AI Licensing (CFI, 8 September 2025)
By order of 8 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_724/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division restricted to Suinno's managing director and representative access to the lawyers' invoices lodged by Microsoft in the cost proceedings concerning EP 2 671 173.
Read the analysisOcclutech v Lepu Medical (Europa) Cooperatief U.A. (CFI, 2 September 2025)
Read the French analysisHologic v Siemens Healthcare (CFI, 26 August 2025)
By an order of 26 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_758/2024 and UPC_CFI_259/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with no objection from Hologic, granted the Siemens defendants' confidentiality application in the infringement action on EP 2 352 431 B1 and the counterclaim for revocation: information on…
Read the analysisDainese v Alpinestars (CFI, 26 August 2025)
By an order of 26 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_472/2024, ORD_33090/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division classified as confidential the information on Dainese's financial situation filed in the security for costs application brought by the defendants, including Alpinestars.
Read the analysisHuawei v MediaTek Germany (CFI, ORD_35006/2025, 21 August 2025)
By a procedural order of 21 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_248/2025, ORD_35006/2025), the presiding judge and rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Judge U. Voß) largely granted the confidentiality application lodged by Huawei on 15 August 2025 in its infringement action against MediaTek concerning…
Read the analysisHuawei v MediaTek Germany (CFI, ORD_35334/2025, 21 August 2025)
Read the French analysisKodak v Fujifilm (CoA, 21 August 2025)
By order of 21 August 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismisses, without examining their substance, the confidentiality requests (Rule 262A RoP) filed by Kodak with its statements of grounds of appeal (UPC_CoA_312/2025 and UPC_CoA_333/2025) against the decisions of the…
Read the analysisAmerican Wave Machines v Surftown (CFI, 12 August 2025)
By procedural order of 12 August 2025, issued in American Wave Machines' action for infringement of EP 2 728 089 against Surftown, WhiteWater Era, WhiteWater West Industries and Endless Surf and in the joined counterclaims for revocation (UPC_CFI_837/2024, UPC_CFI_349/2025 and UPC_CFI_394/2025), the…
Read the analysisHurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, 6 August 2025)
Read the French analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 5 August 2025)
Read the French analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 4 August 2025)
By order of 4 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_140/2024 and UPC_CFI_658/2025, App_33044/2025), Judge Thomas, presiding judge and judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, classified as confidential the information highlighted in the application for a costs decision filed on 16 July 2025 by 10x…
Read the analysisGenevant Sciences v Moderna (CFI, 4 August 2025)
By order of 4 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_191/2025 and UPC_CFI_617/2025, ACT_10280/2025 and CC_32138/2025), the judge rapporteur of The Hague Local Division confirmed, on two applications by Moderna under Rule 262A RoP, the confidentiality regime agreed with Genevant Sciences and Arbutus Biopharma in the…
Read the analysisHuawei v MediaTek (CFI, 1 August 2025)
By order of 1 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_254/2025, ACT_14180/2025, ORD_33620/2025), Judge Voß, presiding judge and judge rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, classified as confidential the information on licence negotiations between Huawei and the MediaTek group contained in MediaTek Germany's request for production…
Read the analysisHuawei v MediaTek Germany (CFI, ORD_33626/2025, 1 August 2025)
By a procedural order of 1 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_254/2025, ACT_14180/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division granted the confidentiality application of MediaTek Germany, defendant in Huawei Technologies' infringement action (EP 4 142 215).
Read the analysisHuawei v MediaTek Germany (CFI, ORD_34182/2025, 1 August 2025)
Read the French analysisAmerican Wave Machines v Surftown (CFI, 1 August 2025)
Read the French analysisMediaTek Germany v Huawei (CFI, 1 August 2025)
Read the French analysisShanghai Jinko Green Energy Enterprise Management v LONGi Solar Technologie (CFI, 29 July 2025)
Read the French analysisSun Patent Trust v Vivo Mobile Communication (CFI, 21 July 2025)
By order of 31 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_362/2025, ORD_33183/2025), the Paris Local Division (Presiding Judge Lignières as judge rapporteur, Judges Gillet and Kupecz) set the protection regime for confidential information produced by the patentee in Sun Patent Trust's infringement action against three Vivo…
Read the analysisVivo Mobile Communication Iber v Sun Patent Trust (CFI, 21 July 2025)
By an order of 31 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_361/2025), the full panel of the Paris Local Division set the regime protecting the confidential information produced by Sun Patent Trust in its infringement action against three Vivo companies (EP 3 852 468).
Read the analysisKinexon Sports & Media v Ballinno (CFI, 16 July 2025)
By order of 16 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_484/2025, ORD_27316/2025), the judge rapporteur Haedicke (Paris Central Division) ruled on the confidentiality of the cost figures contained in the application for a cost decision (Rule 151 RoP) filed by Kinexon after its revocation action against…
Read the analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, 15 July 2025)
By order of 15 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_846/2024, App_29243/2025), the judge rapporteur Kupecz (Munich Local Division) rejected the requests for protection of confidential information filed by the BioNTech and Pfizer companies, defendants to the infringement action under EP 2 401 365 brought by…
Read the analysisQIAGEN Sciences v bioMérieux (CFI, 15 July 2025)
By order of 15 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_181/2025, App_27426/2025), the judge rapporteur Schumacher (Düsseldorf Local Division) set the protection regime for confidential information produced by bioMérieux S.A.
Read the analysisF. Hoffmann-La Roche v Tandem Diabetes Care (CFI, 18 June 2025)
By an order of 18 June 2025 (UPC_CFI_504/2023, EP 1 970 677), Judge-rapporteur Schumacher (Düsseldorf Local Division) granted, without opposition, the application by Rubin Medical, the sixth defendant, to protect the unredacted settlement agreement concluded with F.
Read the analysisEOFLOW v Insulet (CFI, ORD_26828/2025, 5 June 2025)
On Insulet's application in its claim against EOFLOW for the costs of the provisional measures proceedings on EP 4 201 327, the judge rapporteur of the Milan Central Division partly protected the fee evidence filed.
Read the analysisEOFLOW v Insulet (CFI, ORD_25720/2025, 5 June 2025)
Read the French analysisNUC Electronics Europe v Hurom (CFI, ORD_24141/2025, 2 June 2025)
The judge rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division dismissed NUC Electronics Europe and WARMCOOK's confidentiality request concerning the information they were ordered to provide to Hurom by the merits decision of 11 March 2025 (EP 2 028 981) and had lodged with…
Read the analysisNUC Electronics Europe v Hurom (CFI, ORD_26151/2025, 2 June 2025)
Read the French analysisF. Hoffmann-La Roche v Tandem Diabetes Care (CFI, 20 May 2025)
By procedural order of 20 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division granted the application for protection of confidential information filed by three of the defendants (Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care Europe and Rubin Medical) in the…
Read the analysisDDP Specialty Electronic Materials US v Greenchemicals (CFI, 16 May 2025)
By order of 16 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division protected, in the provisional measures proceedings brought by DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US against Greenchemicals under EP 1 957 544 B1 (UPC_CFI_203/2025), financial information contained in the applicant's…
Read the analysisApple Retail France EURL v Ona Patents (CFI, 6 May 2025)
By order of 6 May 2025, the judge rapporteur Thomas (Düsseldorf Local Division) classified as confidential, in Ona Patents' infringement action on EP 2 263 098 against the Apple companies and the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024), the highlighted information in…
Read the analysisASUSTeK Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, ORD_20073/2025, 28 April 2025)
The regime reserved to external counsel and experts only is rejected. Article 58 UPCA and Rule 262A require a fair balance between the parties’ opposing interests, and Rule 262A.6, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal on 12 February 2025, requires that…
Read the analysisASUSTeK Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, ORD_69253/2024, 28 April 2025)
By order of 28 April 2025 (no. 69253/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division set up the protection of confidential information filed by ASUSTeK in Ericsson's infringement action based on EP 3 076 673 (UPC_CFI_319/2024) and in the counterclaim for revocation…
Read the analysisASUSTeK Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, ORD_20078/2025, 28 April 2025)
By order of 28 April 2025 (ORD_20073/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division ruled on the protection of confidential information filed by ASUSTeK in Ericsson's infringement action UPC_CFI_318/2024 and in the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_730/2024.
Read the analysisCUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb v Alpina Coffee Systems (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By procedural order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_519/2024, UPC_CFI_47/2025 and UPC_CFI_52/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential under Art.
Read the analysisMalikie Innovations v Nintendo of Europe (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_537/2024, ORD_13311/2025), Judge-rapporteur Schilling of the Hamburg Local Division confirmed as final the preliminary order of 18 March 2025 protecting under Rule 262A the sales and profit figures filed by Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisOrtovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, ORD_7946/2025, 22 April 2025)
By an order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_16/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential the information on the work billed by Ortovox Sportartikel's lawyers (invoice numbers, hourly rates, hours) in the applications for the determination of costs it…
Read the analysisMaxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 13 April 2025)
Read the French analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 17 March 2025)
By order of 17 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_815/2024, ORD_13125/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (M. Zigann), dealing with Edwards Lifesciences' application for a cost decision (Rule 151) against Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences in the dispute over EP 3 646…
Read the analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, 10 March 2025)
By order of 10 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_846/2024, ACT_68533/2024, ORD_6596/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (A. Kupecz) largely granted the application of Promosome, claimant in an infringement action on EP 2 401 365 against five BioNTech group companies and four Pfizer…
Read the analysisBioNTech Innovative Manufactur (CFI, 10 March 2025)
Read the French analysisApple v Ona Patents (CFI, 12 February 2025)
By order of 12 February 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division organises the protection of confidential information in the dispute between Ona Patents and the Apple companies over EP 2 263 098 B1.
Read the analysisALPINESTARS RESEARCH (CFI, 24 January 2025)
Read the French analysisAmazon.com v Nokia (CoA, 20 January 2025)
Confidentiality orders issued at first instance and not challenged on appeal continue to have effect during the appeal proceedings, including after the close of the proceedings (paras.
Read the analysisSanofi Mature IP v Accord Healthcare (CFI, 14 January 2025)
By order of 14 January 2025, Presiding Judge Matthias Zigann, acting as judge-rapporteur of panel 1 of the Munich Local Division, ruled on Sanofi's application to protect the witness statement filed as Exhibit D.4 in its infringement actions on EP 2 493…
Read the analysisInsulet v A. Menarini Diagnostics (CoA, APL_64383/2024, 9 January 2025)
By order of 9 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_769/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that A. Menarini Diagnostics’ confidentiality request in Insulet’s appeal against the Milan Local Division’s refusal of provisional measures (EP 4 201 327) was superfluous.
Read the analysisSuinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing v Microsoft (CoA, 23 December 2024)
By order of 23 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_826/2024), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal granted Microsoft’s application for Exhibit BP 01, filed with its request for discretionary review in its dispute with Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing (EP 2 671…
Read the analysisMaxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, ORD_57608/2024, 23 December 2024)
By an order of 23 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_336/2024 and UPC_CFI_605/2024), Presiding Judge Thomas, as judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, ruled on confidentiality in Maxeon Solar's action for infringement of EP 3 065 184 against eight defendants, three Aiko companies among them…
Read the analysisValeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 28 November 2024)
By order of 28 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_460/2024, ACT_44736/2024, App_60286/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judge Thomas), in Valeo Electrification's infringement action on EP 3 320 604 B1 against Magna PT B.V.
Read the analysisDaedalus Prime v Xiaomi (CFI, 19 November 2024)
By order of 19 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_169/2024, ACT_19012/2024, ORD_53958/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division (S.
Read the analysisXiaomi Germany (CFI, 19 November 2024)
Read the French analysisHeraeus Electronics v Vibrantz (CFI, 14 November 2024)
By order of 14 November 2024, issued in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_114/2024 and UPC_CFI_448/2024, the Munich Local Division ruled on the confidentiality applications of Vibrantz, the defendant in the infringement action brought by Heraeus Electronics and Heraeus Precious Metals on EP 3…
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Vizgen (CFI, ORD_49363/2024, 24 October 2024)
By order of 24 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_22/2023, ACT_460565/2023, ORD_49363/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division (S. Klepsch), in the infringement action on EP 4 108 782 brought by 10x Genomics and President and Fellows of Harvard College against Vizgen, restricted access…
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Vizgen (CFI, ORD_58030/2024, 24 October 2024)
Read the French analysisValeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 20 September 2024)
By a procedural order of 20 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024, ACT_37931/2024, App_51893/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential, under Art.
Read the analysisOna Patents v Apple (CFI, 30 August 2024)
By order of 30 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_99/2024, ACT_11910/2024, App_43001/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas) granted the confidentiality request filed by Apple Inc.
Read the analysisValeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 21 August 2024)
By order of 21 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024, ACT_37931/2024, App_46219/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas) declared confidential information contained in the objection filed by the Magna companies and in two of its exhibits, in the provisional measures…
Read the analysisNEC v TCL Deutschland (CFI, ORD_41184/2024, 14 August 2024)
By order of 14 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_498/2023, ACT_596658/2023, ORD_41184/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (U. Voß) granted the confidentiality application (No.
Read the analysisNEC v TCL Deutschland (CFI, ORD_41183/2024, 14 August 2024)
By order of 14 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_487/2023, ACT_595922/2023, ORD_41183/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (U. Voß) granted the confidentiality application (No.
Read the analysisAbbott Diabetes Care v Dexcom (CFI, 9 August 2024)
By order of 9 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_402/2023, ACT_584295/2023, App_38165/2024, ORD_38807/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (U. Voß) classified as confidential under Rule 262A RoP the unredacted version of the Dexcom companies' Rejoinder in Abbott Diabetes Care's infringement action on EP…
Read the analysisAGFA v Gucci Belgium (CFI, 9 August 2024)
By order of 9 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_278/2023, ACT_561734/2023, ORD_39257/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division (S.
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 8 August 2024)
By order of 8 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_140/2024, ACT_15774/2024, App_41690/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential under Rule 262A RoP Curio Bioscience's unredacted Statement of Defence, its updated version and two exhibits, in 10x Genomics' infringement action on EP…
Read the analysisCEAD v BEGO Medical (CFI, 30 July 2024)
Read the French analysisICPillar v ARM (CoA, 26 July 2024)
Read the French analysisSimulity Labs (CoA, 26 July 2024)
Read the French analysisOerlikon Textile v Himson Engineering (CFI, ORD_28787/2024, 23 July 2024)
By order of 23 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_240/2023, ACT_549550/2023, ORD_40568/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division (A. Zana) ruled on the confidentiality application made by Oerlikon Textile, claimant in the infringement action on EP 2 145 848 against Himson Engineering.
Read the analysisDolby International v HP Deutschland (CFI, 22 July 2024)
By order of 22 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_457/2023, ACT_590145/2023, App_25069/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas) ruled on the confidentiality application of the fifteen HP group companies, defendants in Dolby International's infringement action on EP 3 490 258.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi Technology Germany (CFI, 10 July 2024)
By order of 10 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_219/2023, App_32822/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann), on the application of Panasonic, claimant in the infringement action on EP 2 568 724 against Xiaomi, Odiporo and Shamrock Mobile, set the confidentiality regime…
Read the analysisPanasonic (CFI, 10 July 2024)
Read the French analysisPanasonic v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications (CFI, 9 July 2024)
By order of 9 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_210/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic's action against OROPE Germany and Guangdong OPPO based on EP 2 568 724 (a standard essential patent), set the confidentiality regime for licences granted to third…
Read the analysisPanasonic (CFI, 9 July 2024)
Read the French analysisGuangdong OPPO Mobile Telecomm v Panasonic (CFI, 6 July 2024)
By an order of 6 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_221/2023, ACT_545620/2023, ORD_18276/2024, App_15611/2024), the judge-rapporteur of panel 1 of the Munich Local Division (M.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi (CFI, ORD_26378/2024, 4 July 2024)
By an order of 4 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_220/2023, ACT_545619/2023, App_21945/2024), the judge-rapporteur of panel 1 of the Munich Local Division (M. Zigann), in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 3 024 163 against Xiaomi Inc.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi (CFI, ORD_18301/2024, 4 July 2024)
By order dated 4 June 2024 and electronically signed on 4 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_220/2023, ACT_545619/2023), the Munich Local Division made the final confidentiality order in Panasonic's action against Xiaomi Inc.
Read the analysisAYLO FREESITES v DISH (CFI, 3 July 2024)
By an order of 3 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_471/2023, ACT_594191/2023, ORD_33986/2024, App_26934/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (D. A. Böttcher), in the infringement action on EP 2 479 680 brought by DISH Technologies L.L.C.
Read the analysisSuinno Mobile & AI Licensing v Microsoft (CFI, 26 June 2024)
By an order of 26 June 2024 (UPC_CFI_164/2024, ACT_18406/2024, ORD_27206/2024, App_19084/2024), the judge-rapporteur of panel 2 of the Paris Central Division (P.
Read the analysisCurio Bioscience v 10x Genomics (CoA, ORD_37131/2024, 20 June 2024)
By order of 20 June 2024 (UPC_CoA_234/2024), the Court of Appeal rejected Curio Bioscience's Rule 262A RoP application in the appeal brought by 10x Genomics against the Düsseldorf Local Division's order on provisional measures (EP 2 697 391).
Read the analysisCurio Bioscience v 10x Genomics (CoA, ORD_37133/2024, 20 June 2024)
Read the French analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 16 June 2024)
Read the French analysisTesla Germany v Avago International Sales (CFI, 16 June 2024)
Read the French analysisPlant-e Knowledge v Arkyne (CFI, ORD_27758/2024, 15 May 2024)
Read the French analysisPlant-e Knowledge v Arkyne (CFI, ORD_15876/2024, 15 May 2024)
Read the French analysisOerlikon Textile v Bhagat Textile Engineers (CFI, 6 May 2024)
By an order of 6 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_241/2023, ACT_549585/2023, App_21554/2024, ORD_23384/2024), the Milan Local Division (P. Perrotti, A. Zana, C.
Read the analysisTesla Germany v Avago Technologies International Sales (CFI, 2 April 2024)
By a final procedural order of 2 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_54/2023, ACT_463258/2023, order no.
Read the analysis