Tesla Germany v Avago Technologies International Sales (CFI, 2 April 2024)
| Date | 2 April 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application RoP262A |
| Registry reference | App_12793/2024 · ORD_12880/2024 |
| Parties | Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE, Tesla Germany GmbH v. Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By a final procedural order of 2 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_54/2023, ACT_463258/2023, order no. 12880/2024), judge-rapporteur Schilling of the Hamburg Local Division declared confidential, at the request of Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE, the information on their sales forecasts contained in their rejoinder of 8 March 2024, in the infringement action on EP 1 612 910 brought by Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited. Access is limited to Avago’s representatives and three named individuals employed by Broadcom Inc. The order accepts that the authorised persons need not be employees of the party itself.
Question
Are sales forecasts trade secrets justifying an access restriction under Rule 262A RoP, and may access be given to employees of a company in the claimant’s group?
Decision
The division relies on Rule 262A RoP and Art. 9(1) and (2)(a) of Directive (EU) 2016/943. The forecast figures are trade secrets: they go beyond what could be calculated from public registration figures, the announced average Model Y price and the published margin, and Avago does not dispute this. The number of authorised persons must not exceed what is needed for a fair trial and an effective remedy, with at least one natural person per party in addition to the representatives (Rule 262A.6 RoP). The three persons named are those already admitted in the order of 3 November 2023, the defendants raise no personal objection to them, and the fact that they work for Broadcom Inc. rather than for the claimant is irrelevant. The final order replaces the provisional order of 11 March 2024. It can be appealed only together with the final decision (Rule 220.1 RoP), no leave having been sought or granted of the court’s own motion.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: access to confidential information may be granted to employees of a group company of the party, particularly where they were already admitted under an earlier order in the same dispute.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 220.1, 220.3 and 262A
- Directive (EU) 2016/943
- Art. 9(1) and (2)(a)
- Case law cited
- Avago v Tesla, Hamburg Local Division, 3 November 2023
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Confidentiality club.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- defendantAvago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited28 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantTesla Germany GmbH16 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantTesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE15 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application RoP262A
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Les prévisions de ventes de Tesla figurant dans sa duplique sont confidentielles, l'accès étant limité aux représentants d'Avago et à trois salariés nommément désignés de Broadcom Inc.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 1 612 910mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Tesla Manufacturing Brandenbur v Avago International Sales (CFI, 2 April 2024) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 November 2023) cited in this record
Patents and standards
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.