Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 16 June 2024)
| Date | 16 June 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application RoP262A |
| Registry reference | App_30430/2024 · ORD_34041/2024 |
| Parties | Tesla Germany GmbH, Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE v. Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By an order of 16 June 2024 (UPC_CFI_52/2023, ACT_462984/2023, APP_30430/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, Matthias Zigann, declared confidential under Rule 262A RoP the group-internal information contained in the written submission lodged on 24 May 2024 by Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE, defendants in the infringement action on EP 1 838 002 brought by Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited. The order holds that protection must be decided even for a late submission.
Question
Must the court rule on the confidentiality of information in a submission lodged out of time, and can figures that are partly public be protected?
Decision
The submission, lodged outside the timetable of the written procedure, could be disregarded under Rule 9.2 RoP, the confidentiality request must nonetheless be decided, as the panel or the Court of Appeal might admit it. The claimant disputed the secrecy of data it said were public. The judge accepted that total production volumes and sales prices are public, but found it credible that the number of vehicles and the average sales price used by the defendants are not. Protection extends in particular to the security amount, the number of vehicles held, the sales period, the assumed average price, lost profit and conversion costs. The information may not be used or disclosed outside the proceedings, even after they end, on pain of a penalty payment of up to EUR 250,000 per breach.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: the public availability of aggregate data does not prevent protection of the internal figures a party derives from it for its own calculations, a Rule 262A RoP request should identify those figures precisely.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 9.2 and 262A
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Confidentiality club.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- defendantAvago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited28 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantTesla Germany GmbH16 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantTesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE15 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application RoP262A
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Les informations internes du mémoire de Tesla du 24 mai 2024 sont déclarées confidentielles, la demande devant être tranchée bien que le mémoire ait été déposé hors délai.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 1 838 002mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Tesla Germany v Avago International Sales (CFI, 16 June 2024) cited in this record
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 6 June 2024) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 1 838 002Programmable hybrid transmitter recorded proprietor: Broadcom Corp | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 7 other decision(s): Avago International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 30 August 2024) · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 27 Januar · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 23 Decemb · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 6 June 20 · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 4 June 20 · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 April 2 · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 25 August | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.