Generic Order
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Generic Order" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
201 decisions recorded
BYD v BMS Innovations (CFI, 9 September 2026)
By order of 9 September 2026 (UPC_CFI_2437/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division rejected BMS Innovations' application to declare inadmissible, or to stay, the action for a declaration of non-infringement brought by six BYD companies in respect of EP 2 937…
Read the analysisSurf Loch v WhiteWater West Industries (CoA, 4 September 2026)
By decision of 4 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_92/2026), the Court of Appeal dismissed the request by Surf Loch, a non-party, for access to the pleadings and evidence in the appeal brought by American Wave Machines (UPC_CoA_75/2026) against the default decision of the Paris…
Read the analysisTopsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 26 August 2026)
By order of 21 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_1696/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the release to Topsoe of the experts' detailed description drawn up after the inspection and preservation order of 25 and 26 November 2025, executed at SYPOX's…
Read the analysisWindhager Handelsgesellschaft m.b.H. v bellissa HAAS (CoA, 21 August 2026)
By decision of 21 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_894/2025), the Court of Appeal held inadmissible Windhager's appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's decision of 12 September 2025, which had largely upheld bellissa HAAS's infringement action on EP 2 223 589 and dismissed the counterclaim…
Read the analysisbiolitec Holding v Light Guide Optics Germany (CFI, UPC_CFI_256/2025, 13 August 2026)
In an order of 13 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_256/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division designates as confidential, under Art. 58 UPCA and Rule 262.2 RoP, the passages of the cost-fixing submissions concerning hourly rates, billing and time spent by the parties'…
Read the analysisbiolitec Holding v Light Guide Optics Germany (CFI, UPC_CFI_256/2025, 13 August 2026, doc. 2)
By order of 13 August 2026, issued in German (UPC_CFI_256/2025), the presiding judge, acting as judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, set the value of the provisional measures proceedings UPC_CFI_486/2024 at EUR 1,000,000 and stayed the cost-fixing proceedings brought by Light Guide…
Read the analysisDolby International v Optoma Deutschland (CFI, 28 July 2026)
In an order of 27 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_226/2024, App_57167/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division grants a lawyer, as a member of the public, access to the statement of claim and part of the exhibits in Dolby International's action against three…
Read the analysisVereenigde Octrooibureaux v Dolby International (CFI, 24 July 2026)
In an order of 24 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_226/2024, App_11638/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division grants the firm Vereenigde Octrooibureaux, as a member of the public, limited access to the statement of claim in Dolby International's action against three Optoma companies…
Read the analysisFranz Kaldewei v Bette (CFI, 23 July 2026)
In an order of 23 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_7/2023, App_44641/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division grants a law firm, as a member of the public, access to the pleadings and evidence of the action for infringement of EP 3 375 337…
Read the analysisFives ECL v REEL (CoA, 17 July 2026)
In an order of 16 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_42/2026), in Fives ECL's appeal against the Hamburg decision of 11 February 2026 on its damages claim (EP 1 740 740), the Court of Appeal ruled on confidentiality and language.
Read the analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 26 June 2026)
In an order of 26 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_1160/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants Edwards Lifesciences, in the damages proceedings brought against Meril after the infringement decision of 4 April 2025 (EP 3 669 828), a two-day extension, until 1…
Read the analysisAdvanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CFI, 11 June 2026)
Read the French analysisMorello Forni Italia srl e Morello Forni Sas di Morello Marco & C v Gastroteam Abbe AB e Marciuliano Attrezzature di Salvatore Marciuliano (CFI, 8 June 2026)
In a decision of 8 June 2026 (UPC_CFI_2046/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division sets at EUR 62,359.32 the costs that Gastroteam Abbe AB and Salvatore Marciuliano (Marciuliano Attrezzature) must reimburse, within thirty days, to Morello Forni Italia and Morello Forni…
Read the analysis1 (CFI, UPC_CFI_777/2025, 12 May 2026)
Read the French analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril Life Sciences (CFI, 12 May 2026)
By decision of 12 May 2026 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_775/2025, UPC_CFI_776/2025 and UPC_CFI_777/2025, the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division permitted, after a settlement, the cross-withdrawals by Edwards Lifesciences and the Meril group of their applications for cost decisions following the decision on the…
Read the analysis1 (CFI, UPC_CFI_776/2025, 12 May 2026)
Read the French analysisYEALINK (XIAMEN) NETWORK v BARCO (CFI, 7 May 2026)
In a decision of 7 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_2265/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division assesses, under Rule 150 RoP, the costs owed by Barco to Yealink after the dismissal of the applications for provisional measures based on EP 3 732 827…
Read the analysisHurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_336/2025, 5 May 2026)
By order of 5 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_336/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permitted Hurom to withdraw its application for a costs decision against NUC Electronics Europe and WARMCOOK, after the Court of Appeal set aside the decision of 11 March…
Read the analysisHurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_335/2025, 5 May 2026)
By order of 5 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_335/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permitted Hurom to withdraw its application for a costs decision against NUC Electronics Co., after the Court of Appeal set aside the decision of 11 March 2025 and…
Read the analysisOTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 4 May 2026)
In an order of 4 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_885/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division sets aside the order for inspection and preservation of evidence it had granted on 22 September 2025 without hearing STEROS GPA Innovative, since OTEC Präzisionsfinish brought no action on the…
Read the analysisTopsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 4 May 2026)
In an order of 4 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_1696/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division rules on SYPOX's request for review (Rule 197.3 RoP) and its request to recuse the experts, both directed at the order for inspection and preservation of evidence issued without hearing…
Read the analysisGUALA PACK v LD Packaging (Foshan) (CFI, 30 April 2026)
In an order of 30 April 2026 (UPC_CFI_840/2026), the Milan Local Division allows Guala Pack to have its statement of claim served on LD Packaging (Foshan), a Chinese company, at its stand at the Interpack trade fair in Düsseldorf from 7 to…
Read the analysisFAKRO Dachflächenfenster v Dolle (CoA, UPC_CoA_928/2025, 28 April 2026)
In an order of 28 April 2026, the Court of Appeal stays, on the parties' joint application (Rule 295(d) RoP), the joined appeals UPC_CoA_928/2025 and UPC_CoA_929/2025 brought by FAKRO against the Hamburg Local Division's decision of 5 November 2025 (EP 2 476…
Read the analysisSuinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing v Microsoft (CoA, 28 April 2026)
Read the French analysisFAKRO Dachflächenfenster v Dolle (CoA, UPC_CoA_929/2025, 28 April 2026)
Read the French analysisSuinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing v Microsoft (CoA, 7 April 2026)
By order of 7 April 2026, the Court of Appeal orders Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing, proprietor of EP 2 671 173, which the Paris Central Division revoked in its entirety, to provide Microsoft with security of EUR 600,000 for the…
Read the analysisEstablishment Labs v GC Aesthetics Parentco (CFI, 18 March 2026)
By an order of 18 March 2026, made in the infringement action on EP 3 107 487 (UPC_CFI_1357/2025) and the related counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_629/2026), the Brussels Local Division ordered Establishment Labs, a Costa Rican company, to provide security of EUR 600,000…
Read the analysisHurom v NUC Electronics (CoA, 4 March 2026)
In an order of 4 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_678/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal rejected Hurom's request to file a further reply after NUC's Statement of Response and cross-appeal, in the appeal against the Paris Local Division decision of 23 May…
Read the analysisSibio v Abbott Diabetes Care (CoA, 27 February 2026)
In an order of 27 February 2026 (UPC_CoA_884/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the UPC Court of Appeal rejected Sibio Technology Limited's request under Rule 36 for a further exchange of written pleadings in its appeal against the Paris Central Division's dismissal of its…
Read the analysisGenentech v Organon Heist (CFI, 12 February 2026)
In an order of 12 February 2026, made in proceedings UPC_CFI_407/2025 and UPC_CFI_408/2025 (EP 3 401 335 B1), Judge Granata, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division, ordered the Registry to release to Genentech and F.
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, UPC_CFI_658/2025, 2 February 2026)
By decision of 2 February 2026 (UPC_CFI_658/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division fixed the costs Curio Bioscience must reimburse to 10x Genomics for the provisional measures proceedings and the main action on EP 2 697 391, following the decision of…
Read the analysisHewlett-Packard Development v Andreas Rentmeister (CFI, 2 February 2026)
In an order of 2 February 2026 (UPC_CFI_515/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division held that publishing on the Court's website its provisional measures order of 19 December 2025, granted to Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, UPC_CFI_657/2025, 2 February 2026)
In a decision of 2 February 2026 (UPC_CFI_657/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered 10x Genomics, Inc. to reimburse EUR 180,000 in costs to Curio Bioscience Inc.
Read the analysisHewlett-Packard Development v Zhuhai ouguan Electronic Technology Co (CFI, 2 February 2026)
In an order of 2 February 2026 (UPC_CFI_449/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division held that publishing on the Court's website its provisional measures order of 28 November 2025, granted to Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Read the analysisEcovacs Robotics v Roborock (HK) (CFI, 19 December 2025)
By order of 19 December 2025 (UPC_CFI_834/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, on Roborock (HK)'s request for review under Rule 197.3 RoP, revoked in full and with retroactive effect the ex parte order for inspection and preservation of evidence granted to Ecovacs Robotics…
Read the analysisASUS Technology Licensing v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications (CFI, 12 December 2025)
In an order of 12 December 2025, the Munich Local Division ordered ASUS Technology Licensing, a claimant seated in Taiwan, to provide EUR 200,000 security for costs within six weeks in its infringement action on EP 3 346 616 against Guangdong OPPO…
Read the analysisCanon Kabushiki Kaisha v Katun Germany (CFI, 10 December 2025)
In an order of 10 December 2025 made by Judge-rapporteur Schumacher after the interim conference of 4 December (Rule 105.5), in UPC_CFI_351/2024 and UPC_CFI_595/2024 between Canon and Katun, the Düsseldorf Local Division required English translations of all exhibits and a preliminary estimate…
Read the analysisAesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 4 December 2025)
In a procedural order of 4 December 2025 (UPC_CFI_307/2025, EP 2 892 442 B1), the presiding judge of the Düsseldorf Local Division, acting as judge-rapporteur, set the oral hearing of Aesculap's action against Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument and other defendants for 17…
Read the analysisVivo Mobile Communication v Sun Patent Trust (CoA, 27 November 2025)
In an order of 27 November 2025 (UPC_CoA_904/2025 and UPC_CoA_905/2025), the Court of Appeal rejected Vivo's request to stay the proceedings brought by Sun Patent Trust before the Paris Local Division, or alternatively to extend the deadline for the statement of defence,…
Read the analysisCanon Kabushiki Kaisha v Katun Germany (CFI, 20 November 2025)
In an order of 20 November 2025, made in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_351/2024 and UPC_CFI_595/2024, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on Canon's request for a further exchange of written pleadings against Katun and General Plastic Industrial (EP 3 686…
Read the analysisInter Digital VC v The Walt Disney (CFI, 19 November 2025)
In an order of 19 November 2025, made in proceedings UPC_CFI_87/2025 and UPC_CFI_488/2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed InterDigital VC Holdings to respond, by 20 November 2025, to the non-infringement and FRAND arguments raised by The Walt Disney Company…
Read the analysisYangtze Memory Technologies v Micron Technology (CFI, 7 November 2025)
By an order of 7 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_1041/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division extended to 16 March 2026 the time limit for the defence, and any counterclaim for revocation, of the four Micron companies sued by Yangtze Memory Technologies for…
Read the analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, 17 October 2025)
By decision of 17 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_404/2025 and UPC_CFI_405/2025, EP 3 669 828), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division ordered Meril GmbH, Meril Life Sciences and Meril Italy to pay Edwards Lifesciences EUR 771,649.56 in costs within 20 days, in the…
Read the analysisGenentech v Organon (CFI, 17 October 2025)
Open the entryHewlett-Packard Development Company v Zhuhai ouguan Electronic Technology (CFI, 16 October 2025)
In an order of 16 October 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division held that the steps already taken to bring Hewlett-Packard's application for provisional measures to the attention of the Chinese company Zhuhai ouguan Electronic Technology constitute good service under Rule 275.2, effective…
Read the analysisLeap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 15 October 2025)
In an order of 15 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Leap Tools to serve its statement of claim of 13 June 2025 on the second defendant, Wizart LLC, a Delaware company that could not be found at…
Read the analysisHartmann Packaging v Omni-Pac Ekco GmbH Verpackungsmittel (CFI, 15 October 2025)
In a decision of 15 October 2025, given in joined proceedings UPC_CFI_115/2024 and UPC_CFI_377/2024, the Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed Hartmann Packaging's infringement action against two Omni-Pac companies and partly allowed their counterclaim for revocation of EP 2 755 901, which concerns a…
Read the analysisDolby International v Beko Germany (CFI, 14 October 2025)
In an order of 14 October 2025, given in proceedings UPC_CFI_135/2024 and UPC_CFI_477/2024 (patent EP 3 605 534), the Düsseldorf Local Division, on the application of Beko Germany and Arçelik and after hearing Dolby International, cancelled the oral hearing set for 16…
Read the analysisOna Patents v Google Ireland (CFI, 14 October 2025)
In an order of 14 October 2025, given in joined proceedings UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024, the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the unsolicited submission filed by Ona Patents on 1 September 2025 against Google Ireland and Google Commerce (patent EP…
Read the analysisGenentech v Organon (CFI, 14 October 2025)
Open the entryHeadwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 2 October 2025)
In an order of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_496/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, of its own motion and under Rule 353, rectified paragraph 6 of the operative part of its decision of 29 September 2025, which contained a clerical error and a calculation…
Read the analysisSCANTRUST v ADVANCED TRACK AND TRACE (CFI, 25 September 2025)
Read the French analysisAtlas Global v TP-LINK (CFI, 18 September 2025)
By a procedural order of 18 September 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division, with the parties' consent, stayed the infringement actions and revocation counterclaims between Atlas Global and TP-LINK CORPORATION PTE.
Read the analysisGuangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications v Crystal Clear Codec (CFI, 18 September 2025)
Read the French analysisInterDigital CE Patent v Disney Electronic Content (CFI, 17 September 2025)
By a procedural order of 17 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_297/2025 and UPC_CFI_651/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division decided, with the parties' consent, to hear together InterDigital CE Patent Holdings' infringement action against eleven Disney group companies (EP 2 080 349) and the revocation counterclaim…
Read the analysisMED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte v Zhejiang Nurotron Biotechnology (CFI, 25 August 2025)
By an order of 25 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_688/2025, ORD_35448/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division (Judge Johansson) refused to allow MED-EL's statement of claim in its infringement action concerning EP 4 074 373 to be served on Zhejiang Nurotron Biotechnology through…
Read the analysisMicrosoft v Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing (CoA, 21 August 2025)
By order of 21 August 2025 (UPC_CoA_363/2025), the Court of Appeal dismisses Microsoft’s application under Rule 353 RoP to rectify its decision by default of 12 July 2025 against Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing, given for failure to provide the security…
Read the analysisOcclutech v Lepu Medical (Europa) (CFI, 20 August 2025)
Read the French analysisOrthoApnea (CFI, 19 August 2025)
By an order of 19 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_131/2025, ORD_35065/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division (Judge Granata), on the application of OrthoApnea and Vivisol B, corrected a calculation error in the total of the costs decision of 25 July 2025.
Read the analysisKinexon Sports & Media v Ballinno (CFI, 14 August 2025)
By order of 14 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_151/2024, App_44034/2024), Judge Schilling, judge rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division, released to UEFA, Kinexon and Kinexon Sports & Media the EUR 56,000 security provided by Ballinno under Rule 158 RoP, ordered its transfer to Kinexon's…
Read the analysisWonderland Nurserygoods v Cybex (CFI, 5 August 2025)
By order of 5 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_807/2024 and UPC_CFI_334/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Presiding Judge Thomas, Judge Schumacher as judge rapporteur, Judge Bessaud and technically qualified Judge Roselinger) decided, with the parties' consent, to hear both Wonderland Nurserygoods' infringement action against Cybex…
Read the analysisImusyn v BAG Diagnostics (CFI, 4 August 2025)
By order of 4 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_550/2025, ACT_29036/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, through its presiding judge and judge rapporteur, Judge Thomas, asked the President of the Court of First Instance, with the parties' consent, to add to the panel a technically qualified…
Read the analysisCUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb v ALPINA Coffee Systems (CFI, 4 August 2025)
Read the French analysisGenentech v Organon (CFI, 1 August 2025)
Open the entryOna Patents v Google Commerce (CFI, 1 August 2025)
Read the French analysisOna Patents v Apple (CFI, 1 August 2025)
By order of 1 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024, ACT_11910/2024 and CC_40010/2024), Judge Thomas, presiding judge and judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, found Ona Patents' account of its title to EP 2 263 098 B1, asserted against five Apple companies,…
Read the analysisToyota Motor Europe v Neo Wireless (CFI, 31 July 2025)
By an order of 31 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_361/2023, App_30331/2025), the Paris Central Division (Judges Zhilova, Haedicke, judge-rapporteur, and Matter, technically qualified judge) allowed Toyota Motor Europe to withdraw its revocation action against Neo Wireless (EP 3 876 490) and closed the proceedings,…
Read the analysisTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik v IPG Laser (CFI, 25 July 2025)
By order of 25 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_733/2024 and UPC_CFI_255/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judge Thom, for Presiding Judge Thomas, Judge Schumacher as judge-rapporteur, and Judge Agergaard) decided to hear both TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik's infringement action against IPG Laser on EP 2…
Read the analysisZTE v Samsung Electronics Italia (CFI, 24 July 2025)
By order of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_850/2024), Judge Böttcher, judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division, confirmed his order of 20 June 2025 on the value in dispute in ZTE's infringement action against Samsung Electronics and five European subsidiaries on EP 3 905…
Read the analysisHanshow Germany v VusionGroup (CoA, 24 July 2025)
By decision of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_285/2025), the Court of Appeal (Presiding Judge Grabinski, Judge Gougé as judge-rapporteur, and Judge Germano) permitted Hanshow Germany to withdraw its appeal, limited to costs, against the Paris Central Division's decision of 27 January 2025.
Read the analysisSanofi v Accord Healthcare (CFI, 17 July 2025)
Read the French analysisSanofi Mature IP (CFI, 17 July 2025)
Read the French analysisSanofi-Aventis (CFI, 17 July 2025)
Read the French analysisZentiva Pharma v Sanofi Belgium (CFI, 17 July 2025)
Read the French analysisMAGUIN v TIRU (CoA, 15 July 2025)
By order of 15 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_327/2025, APL_16749/2025), the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal brought by MAGUIN, the manufacturer of an incineration kiln, against the Paris Local Division's order of 24 March 2025 refusing to set aside evidence preservation and inspection…
Read the analysisQUANTIFICARE v Canfield Scientific (CFI, 2 July 2025)
By order of 2 July 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas, Schumacher, Agergaard), having heard the parties and before the close of the written procedure, decided to hear both Quantificare's infringement action on EP 3 156 843 against the Canfield Scientific companies…
Read the analysisEasee v Visibly (CoA, 1 July 2025)
By order of 1 July 2025, the Court of Appeal (Kalden, Rombach, Simonsson) stayed the cross-appeals of Easee and Visibly (UPC_CoA_542/2025 and UPC_CoA_526/2025) against the Hamburg Local Division's order of 30 May 2025, which had required Easee to provide EUR 75,000 security…
Read the analysisAesculap v Shanghai International Holding (CFI, 23 June 2025)
By procedural order of 23 June 2025 (Rule 9), Judge Thomas, presiding judge and rapporteur (Düsseldorf Local Division), informed Aesculap and Shanghai International Holding Corporation (Europe), in the provisional measures proceedings on EP 2 892 442 (UPC_CFI_213/2025), of the feature breakdown of…
Read the analysisZTE v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 20 June 2025)
By an order of 20 June 2025 (UPC_CFI_850/2024, EP 3 905 730), issued of the court's own motion by Judge-rapporteur Böttcher (Mannheim Local Division), the value in dispute of the whole proceedings brought by ZTE against Samsung Electronics and five group companies…
Read the analysisCanon Kabushiki Kaisha v General Plastic Industrial (CFI, 12 June 2025)
Read the French analysisNJOY Netherlands v Juul Labs International (CFI, 9 June 2025)
By an order of 9 June 2025 (UPC_CFI_309/2023, EP 3 498 115), Judge-rapporteur Haedicke (Paris Central Division) granted the firm Meissner Bolte, a non-party, access to the pleadings and evidence in NJOY Netherlands' revocation action against Juul Labs International, concluded at first…
Read the analysisSamsung Electronics v ZTE Deutschland (CFI, 28 May 2025)
By order of 28 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division provisionally set the value of Samsung Electronics' infringement action on EP 4 050 804 against three ZTE companies (UPC_CFI_189/2025) at EUR 4,000,000 and ordered Samsung to pay an…
Read the analysisNanoval v ALD Vacuum Technologies (CFI, 28 May 2025)
By order of 28 May 2025, following an oral hearing on 9 May 2025, the Munich Local Division rejected ALD Vacuum Technologies' request for review of the order for preservation of evidence and inspection made on 3 February 2025, without hearing ALD,…
Read the analysisBAUSSMANN Collated Fasteners v Raimund Beck Nageltechnik (CFI, 26 May 2025)
Read the French analysisMaschio Gaspardo v Spiridonakis Bros GP (CFI, 15 May 2025)
By order of 15 May 2025 (ORD_22310/2025), the judge rapporteur of the Milan Central Division ordered, in the action for infringement of EP 1 998 604 brought by Maschio Gaspardo against Spiridonakis Bros, which did not appear (UPC_CFI_513/2024), an on-site inspection of…
Read the analysisBallinno v Kinexon Sports & Media (CoA, 12 May 2025)
By order of 12 May 2025 (UPC_CoA_328/2024), the Court of Appeal ruled on Ballinno's appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's orders requiring it to provide security for costs of EUR 56,000 and then dismissing its application for provisional measures against Kinexon and…
Read the analysisOerlikon Textile v Bhagat Textile Engineers (CFI, 9 May 2025)
By order of 9 May 2025 (ORD_22179/2025), the judge rapporteur of the Milan Local Division set at EUR 77,064.65 the costs that Bhagat Textile Engineers must reimburse to Oerlikon Textile, following the decision on the merits of 4 November 2024, which had…
Read the analysisSanofi (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Read the French analysisSanofi Mature IP (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Read the French analysisHybridgenerator v HGSystem (CoA, 8 May 2025)
In Hybridgenerator's appeal against an order of the Copenhagen Local Division declining to order HGSystem and other companies to pay the penalty payments set in an order of 4 September 2024 (EP 4 238 202, UPC_CoA_233/2025), the Court of Appeal made English…
Read the analysisSanofi v Accord Healthcare (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Read the French analysisAesculap v Shanghai International Holding (CFI, 1 May 2025)
In the provisional measures proceedings brought by Aesculap against Shanghai International Holding Corporation (Europe) under EP 2 892 442 (UPC_CFI_213/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division asked the Presidium of the Court of First Instance to assign a technically qualified judge to the panel…
Read the analysisMaxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By procedural order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_336/2024 and UPC_CFI_605/2024, ORD_17892/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judge-rapporteur Thomas) decided, before the end of the written procedure, to hear together Maxeon Solar's infringement action on EP 3 065 184 against eight defendants, including Aiko…
Read the analysisLabrador Diagnostics v bioMérieux (CFI, 23 April 2025)
Read the French analysisKunststoff KG Nehl v Häfele (CFI, 18 April 2025)
By order of 18 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_526/2024, ORD_18972/2025), Judge-rapporteur Kupecz of the Munich Central Division prepared the oral hearing in the revocation action brought by Kunststoff KG Nehl & Co.
Read the analysisAtlas Global Technologies v TP-LINK (CFI, 17 April 2025)
Read the French analysisOna Patents v Google Ireland (CFI, 14 April 2025)
By procedural order of 14 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_100/2024 and UPC_CFI_411/2024, ORD_9090/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judges Thomas, presiding, Thom, rapporteur, and Kokke) decided, with the parties' consent and before the close of the written procedure, to hear together Ona Patents' infringement action…
Read the analysisShanghai Jinko Green Energy Enterprise Management v LONGi Solar Technologie (CFI, ORD_17984/2025, 14 April 2025)
Read the French analysisOna Patents v Apple (CFI, 14 April 2025)
By procedural order of 14 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024, ORD_9091/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judges Thomas, presiding and rapporteur, Thom and Kokke) decided, with the parties' consent and before the close of the written procedure, to hear together Ona Patents' infringement…
Read the analysis