Generic Order
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Generic Order" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
201 decisions recorded
Samsung Electronics v Fingon (CFI, 4 April 2025)
By order of 4 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_750/2024, ORD_11176/2025), Judge-rapporteur Böttcher of the Mannheim Local Division rejected the preliminary objection of Samsung Electronics GmbH and Samsung Electronics France in Fingon LLC's infringement action on EP 2 839 403.
Read the analysisFujifilm v Kodak Graphic Communications (CFI, 2 April 2025)
Read the French analysisFUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, ORD_15984/2025, 2 April 2025)
By an order of 2 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_359/2023), the Mannheim Local Division separated, in FUJIFILM's infringement action against three Kodak companies (EP 3 476 616), the requests concerning the UK part of the patent, which will be dealt with in separate proceedings.
Read the analysisFUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, ORD_15980/2025, 2 April 2025)
By an order of 2 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_365/2023), the Mannheim Local Division separated, in FUJIFILM's infringement action against three Kodak companies (EP 3 511 174), the requests concerning the UK part of the patent, which will be dealt with in separate proceedings.
Read the analysisBayerische Motoren Werke v ITCiCo Spain (CFI, 31 March 2025)
By order of 31 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_412/2023, ORD_15677/2025), the Paris Central Division (Judges Catallozzi, presiding and rapporteur, Zhilova and Otten-Dünnweber, technically qualified) rejected Bayerische Motoren Werke's application to supplement, by way of rectification, the order of 9 January 2025.
Read the analysisDISH Technologies v Cloudflare (CFI, 27 March 2025)
By order of 27 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_471/2023, ORD_15005/2025), Judge-rapporteur Böttcher of the Mannheim Local Division rejected DISH Technologies and Sling TV's request for a finding that the information they sought from Cloudflare, a third party, under Rule 191 was not decisive for…
Read the analysisAdeia Guides v The Walt Disney Company (Benelux) (CFI, 20 March 2025)
By order of 19 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_665/2024, ORD_13670/2025), the Munich Local Division (Judges Zigann, presiding and rapporteur, Bessaud and Pichlmaier) rectified under Rule 353 a typing error in the scheduling order of 18 March 2025 issued in Adeia Guides' infringement action on…
Read the analysisHartmann Packaging v Omni-Pac Ekco GmbH Verpackungsmittel (CFI, 20 March 2025)
By order of 20 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_115/2024 and UPC_CFI_377/2024, ORD_9089/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judges Thomas, presiding and rapporteur, Schumacher and Kupecz) decided, after hearing the parties, who raised no objection, to hear together Hartmann Packaging's infringement action on EP 2 755…
Read the analysisAdeia Guides v The Walt Disney Company (Benelux) (CFI, 13 March 2025)
By procedural order of 18 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_665/2024, ACT_59975/2024, ORD_69068/2024), the Munich Local Division (M.
Read the analysisHurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, ORD_11865/2025, 11 March 2025)
By a decision of 11 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_159/2024), the Mannheim Local Division ruled on Hurom's infringement action (EP 2 028 981, juice extractor) against NUC Electronics Europe and WARMCOOK concerning the "AUTO10" juicer sold under the Kuvings brand.
Read the analysisHurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, ORD_11863/2025, 11 March 2025)
By a decision of 11 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_162/2024), the Mannheim Local Division ruled on Hurom's infringement action (EP 2 028 981, juice extractor) against the Korean company NUC Electronics Co., parent of the NUC group, concerning the "AUTO10" juicer.
Read the analysisSuinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing v Microsoft (CFI, 3 March 2025)
By order of 3 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_164/2024, ACT_18406/2024, ORD_8385/2025), the Paris Central Division (P. Catallozzi, presiding and rapporteur, T.
Read the analysisHeraeus Electronics v Vibrantz (CFI, 26 February 2025)
Read the French analysisHanshow Technology v VusionGroup (CoA, 21 February 2025)
By order of 21 February 2025 (UPC_CoA_618/2024, APL_57918/2024), the Standing Judge of the Court of Appeal (Judge Simonsson) dismissed VusionGroup's applications for a default decision and for the appeal to be rejected as inadmissible, in the appeal brought by Hanshow Technology against…
Read the analysisChainzone Technology (Foshan) v SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H. (CFI, 19 February 2025)
By an order of 19 February 2025 (ORD_8499/2025, App_25380/2024, UPC_CFI_156/2024), the Munich Local Division (panel presided over by Judge Zigann as rapporteur) granted Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisArcelorMittal v XPENG (CFI, 19 February 2025)
By order of 19 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_583/2024, ACT_54607/2024, ORD_8329/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division (Judge Lignières) granted POSCO, as a member of the public, access to ArcelorMittal's statement of claim and its exhibits, except Exhibit 8, which is covered by…
Read the analysisMeril Italy v SWAT Medical (CoA, 12 February 2025)
By an order of 12 February 2025 (UPC_CoA_634/2024), the Court of Appeal, hearing Meril Italy’s appeal against the Paris Central Division’s order of 14 October 2024 granting access under Rule 262.1(b) RoP to the pleadings and evidence in the revocation action between…
Read the analysisMeril v SWAT Medical (CoA, 12 February 2025)
By an order of 12 February 2025 (UPC_CoA_635/2024), the Court of Appeal, hearing Meril GmbH’s appeal against the Paris Central Division’s order of 14 October 2024 granting access to the file under Rule 262.1(b) RoP in the counterclaim for revocation between Meril…
Read the analysisMeril Life Sciences v SWAT Medical (CoA, 12 February 2025)
By an order of 12 February 2025 (UPC_CoA_636/2024), the Court of Appeal, hearing Meril Life Sciences' appeal against the Paris Central Division's order of 14 October 2024 granting third parties access to the pleadings in the counterclaim for revocation of EP 3…
Read the analysisXSYS Prepress v Esko-Graphics Imaging (CFI, 10 February 2025)
By an order of 10 February 2025 (ORD_6847/2025, UPC_CFI_483/2024), Ulrike Voß, judge rapporteur in the Munich Local Division, rejected the preliminary objection raised by XSYS Germany GmbH, XSYS Prepress N.V.
Read the analysisPanasonic v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecomm (CFI, ORD_6393/2025, 6 February 2025)
Read the French analysisLenovo (Singapore) v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, ORD_4350/2025, 27 January 2025)
By an order of 27 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_302/2024, EP 3 682 587), Panel 1 of the Munich Local Division decided, at the request of the defendants ASUSTek Computer, ASUS Computer and ASUSTEK (UK), to hear Lenovo (Singapore)'s infringement action together with the…
Read the analysisSnowpixie v Golf Tech Golfartikel Vertrieb (CFI, 27 January 2025)
By an order of 27 January 2025 in the joined infringement action and counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_244/2024 and UPC_CFI_786/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Judge Pichlmaier) ordered the infringement claimant to provide, by 24 February 2025, security for costs of…
Read the analysisSnowPixie (CFI, 27 January 2025)
Read the French analysisPhoton Wave v Seoul Viosys (CFI, 24 January 2025)
By an order of 24 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_238/2024), the full panel of the Paris Local Division, presided over by Judge Lignières, held inadmissible the standalone revocation action brought by Photon Wave against Seoul Viosys's patent EP 3 404 726.
Read the analysisDexCom v Abbott Laboratories (CoA, ORD_3184/2025, 24 January 2025)
By an order of 24 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_569/2024), the Court of Appeal permitted, on appeal, the withdrawal of DexCom's infringement action (UPC_CFI_233/2023, EP 3 797 685) and of the Abbott companies' counterclaims for revocation, declared the proceedings closed and ordered a refund…
Read the analysisEdwards Lifesciences v Meril (CFI, ORD_3866/2025, 23 January 2025)
By an order of 23 January 2025 (ORD_3866/2025, UPC_CFI_815/2024, EP 3 646 825), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Judge Zigann) invited Edwards Lifesciences to comment within ten days on the confidentiality of its cost application against Meril GmbH and Meril…
Read the analysisSanofi Winthrop Industrie v Accord Healthcare (CFI, 22 January 2025)
By a common order of 22 January 2025, issued after the preliminary interim conference in Sanofi's four joined infringement actions against Accord, Stada, Reddy and Zentiva (UPC_CFI_145/2024 to UPC_CFI_148/2024, EP 2 493 466, cabazitaxel), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Judge…
Read the analysisAmazon Europe Core v Nokia Technologies (CoA, 20 January 2025)
By order of 20 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_835/2024), the Court of Appeal ruled on the confidentiality application filed by Amazon Europe Core, Amazon EU and Amazon.com with their appeal against an order of the Munich Local Division of 16 December 2024, which had…
Read the analysisHuawei v Netgear International (CFI, 2 January 2025)
By an order of 2 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_168/2024), panel 1 of the Munich Local Division decided, at both parties' request, to hear together Huawei's infringement action against Netgear Deutschland, Netgear Inc.
Read the analysisHuawei v NETGEAR Deutschland (CFI, 30 December 2024)
By order of 30 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_168/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, in Huawei's action against three Netgear companies for infringement of EP 3 678 321 and the counterclaim for revocation, asked the President of the Court of First Instance…
Read the analysisSumi Agro Europe v Syngenta (CoA, 27 December 2024)
By order of 27 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_523/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal relieved Syngenta of the need to translate Exhibit FF25, a German-language document filed with its Statement of response in Sumi Agro’s appeal against an order of the Munich…
Read the analysisG. Pohl-Boskamp v pharma-aktiva (CFI, 20 December 2024)
By an order of 20 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_541/2024), made after an oral hearing, the Mannheim Local Division (Judge Tochtermann presiding, Judge Böttcher as judge-rapporteur, Judge Mlakar) granted G.
Read the analysisSyngenta v Sumi Agro (CFI, 12 December 2024)
By an order of 12 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_201/2024, ORD_65555/2024), the presiding judge of panel 1 of the Munich Local Division, acting as judge-rapporteur, dismissed Syngenta Limited's application to revoke order ORD 47657/2024 made in favour of Sumi Agro Limited and Sumi Agro…
Read the analysisDexCom v Abbott Diagnostics (CFI, 11 December 2024)
By a decision of 11 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_395/2023, ACT_583778/2023), the Paris Local Division revoked in its entirety DexCom, Inc.'s EP 3 831 282, on remote monitoring of analyte measurements, on the counterclaim of fourteen Abbott group companies, and accordingly dismissed the infringement…
Read the analysisMagna International France v Valeo Electrification (CoA, 11 December 2024)
In an order of 11 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_719/2024), the Court of Appeal partly suspended the preliminary injunction granted on 31 October 2024 by the Düsseldorf Local Division against the Magna companies in favour of Valeo Electrification (EP 3 320 602).
Read the analysisMeril Life Sciences v Edwards Lifesciences (CFI, 11 December 2024)
By a procedural order of 11 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_380/2023, ACT_582093/2023), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division, reconsidering the matter after remittal by the Court of Appeal, dismissed the request by Meril Life Sciences Pvt Limited and five other defendants to stay Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's…
Read the analysisHand Held Products v Scandit (CFI, 11 December 2024)
Read the French analysisOerlikon Textile v Himson Engineering (CFI, 25 November 2024)
By procedural order of 25 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_240/2023, ACT_549550/2023, ORD_62633/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division (A.
Read the analysisDexCom v Abbott Laboratories (CFI, 21 November 2024)
Read the French analysisCretes v Hyler (CFI, 25 October 2024)
By order of 25 October 2024 (ORD_55012/2024), the Brussels Local Division (S. Granata, presiding and rapporteur, A.
Read the analysisMSG Maschinenbau v EJP Maschinen (CFI, 11 October 2024)
By order of 11 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_300/2023, CC_597425/2023), the Munich Local Division (panel 2, presided by U. Voß) drew the consequences of the final revocation of EP 3 225 320 B1 by the EPO Board of Appeal on 4 July 2024 (T…
Read the analysisi-mop v ARCORA International (CFI, 11 October 2024)
By decision of 11 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_193/2024, ACT_22922/2024), the Munich Local Division (panel 2: U. Voß, presiding judge and rapporteur, D.
Read the analysisEOFLOW v Insulet (CoA, 9 October 2024)
In an order of 9 October 2024 (UPC_CoA_584/2024), the Court of Appeal refused EOFlow’s request to expedite its appeal against the order of 24 September 2024 of the Milan Central Division, which had declined to join Insulet’s application for provisional measures against…
Read the analysisAbbott Diabetes Care v Dexcom (CFI, 7 October 2024)
By preliminary order of 7 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_430/2023, ACT_588346/2023, ORD_55063/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (K. Härmand, panel presided by S.
Read the analysisNEC v TCT Mobile Germany (CFI, 2 October 2024)
By order of 2 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_487/2023, ACT_595922/2023, ORD_54526/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (panel 2, U.
Read the analysisNEC v TCL Communication (CFI, ORD_46842/2024, 2 October 2024)
By order of 2 October 2024 (ORD_46842/2024, registered under ACT_595922/2023, although the operative part refers to proceedings UPC_CFI_153/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (panel 2, D.
Read the analysisNEC v TCL Deutschland (CFI, 2 October 2024)
By order of 2 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_153/2024, ACT_16417/2024, ORD_46985/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (panel 2, D. Voß) admitted Access Advance, administrator of an HEVC standard-essential patent pool, as an intervener in support of NEC in its infringement action on…
Read the analysisNEC v TCL Communication (CFI, ORD_46866/2024, 2 October 2024)
By order of 2 October 2024 (ORD_46866/2024, UPC_CFI_498/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division admitted Access Advance, administrator of the HEVC standard essential patent pool to which NEC contributed EP 3 057 321, as an intervener in support of NEC in…
Read the analysisEOFLOW v Insulet (CFI, 1 October 2024)
By order of 1 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_380/2024, ORD_52068/2024), the Milan Central Division (A. Postiglione, presiding and judge-rapporteur, A.-L.
Read the analysisDolby International v Optoma (CFI, 26 September 2024)
By order of 26 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_226/2024, ACT_26489/2024, ORD_53245/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas, presiding and judge-rapporteur, Dr Thom, Kokke) permitted, with the defendants' consent, Dolby International's withdrawal of its infringement action on EP 3 605 534 against the Optoma companies, made…
Read the analysisValeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 25 September 2024)
By a procedural order of 25 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024, ACT_37931/2024, ORD_53404/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division set out, ahead of the oral hearing of 8 October 2024, the evidence regime for the application for provisional measures brought by Valeo Electrification…
Read the analysisGrundfos v Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump (CFI, 13 September 2024)
Read the French analysisHuawei v Netgear International (CFI, 9 September 2024)
By order of 9 September 2024 (ACT_459771/2023, ORD_50813/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (M. Zigann), in Huawei Technologies' infringement action on EP 3 611 989 against Netgear, set aside point 3 of his order of 30 August 2024 appointing a…
Read the analysisHEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT v LAMA FRANCE (CFI, 21 August 2024)
By order of 21 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_358/2023, ACT_578697/2023, ORD_47694/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division (C. Lignières) excluded from the proceedings most of the brief filed on 15 July 2024 by Hewlett-Packard Development Company and of the brief…
Read the analysisSibio v Abbott Diabetes Care (CoA, 19 August 2024)
In an order of 19 August 2024 (UPC_CoA_388/2024), the Court of Appeal granted suspensive effect to the appeal of Sibio Technology and Umedwings Netherlands against the provisional measures ordered on 19 June 2024 by The Hague Local Division in favour of Abbott…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, 16 August 2024)
By order of 16 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_317/2024, ACT_35572/2024, App_41354/2024), the Lisbon Local Division (R. Lopes, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, S.
Read the analysisNEC v TCL Deutschland (CFI, 6 August 2024)
By order of 6 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_498/2023, ACT_596658/2023, order No. 44084/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (U.
Read the analysisSodaStream Industries v Aarke (CFI, 5 August 2024)
By order of 5 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_373/2023, ACT_580849/2023, App_35905/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division (Dr Thom) dismissed Aarke's request for EUR 400,000 security for costs against SodaStream Industries, an Israeli company, in the infringement action on EP 1 793 917.
Read the analysisFUJIFILM v Kodak Graphic Communications (CFI, 2 August 2024)
By order of 2 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_355/2023, ORD_40822/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division refused FUJIFILM leave under Rule 263 RoP to extend to all designations its auxiliary requests to amend EP 3 594 009, which were limited to the German…
Read the analysisSWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme v STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions (CFI, 31 July 2024)
Read the French analysisDolby International v HP Deutschland (CFI, 30 July 2024)
By order of 30 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_457/2023, ACT_590145/2023, ORD_42107/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential under Rule 262A RoP the licence agreements (exhibits BP-Liz 1 to 25) filed by Access Advance LLC, administrator of the HEVC patent pool…
Read the analysisAmgen v Sanofi Winthrop Industrie (CFI, 29 July 2024)
By order of 29 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_14/2023, ORD_43914/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division stayed, at the unanimous request of the parties, Amgen's infringement action against Sanofi and Regeneron on EP 3 666 797 pending the appeal against the Central Division's…
Read the analysisCANÈ v France Développement Électronique (CFI, 26 July 2024)
By decision of 26 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_419/2023, ORD_43695/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, sitting as single judge, confirmed the settlement of 20 June 2024 ending CANÈ's infringement action against France Développement Électronique on EP 3 181 168, ordered reimbursement to…
Read the analysisSeoul Viosys v Laser Components (CFI, 24 July 2024)
By order of 24 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023, ACT_588685/2023, ORD_41423/2024), the Paris Local Division (C. Lignières, presiding and rapporteur, C.
Read the analysisOerlikon Textile v Himson Engineering (CFI, ORD_40568/2024, 23 July 2024)
Read the French analysisOrthoApnea (CFI, 19 July 2024)
By order of 19 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_376/2023, ACT_581538/2023, App_41533/2024), the Brussels Local Division (S. Granata, judge-rapporteur and presiding, M.
Read the analysisMED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. v Advanced Bionics (CFI, 10 July 2024)
By order of 10 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_410/2023, ACT_585052/2023, CC_15513/2024, ORD_35569/2024), the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann, presiding, H.
Read the analysisPanasonic v Shamrock Mobile (CFI, 4 July 2024)
By an order of 4 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_219/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (Dr Tochtermann), in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 2 568 724 against Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH and five other companies, gave the parties preliminary technical…
Read the analysisDexCom v Abbott Scandinavia Aktiebolag (CFI, 4 July 2024)
By a decision of 4 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_230/2023, ACT_546446/2023), following an oral hearing on 24 May 2024, the Paris Local Division (C. Lignières, presiding and judge-rapporteur, R.
Read the analysisPanasonic v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecomm (CFI, 27 June 2024)
By an order of 27 June 2024 (UPC_CFI_210/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (Dr Tochtermann), in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 2 568 724 against OROPE Germany GmbH and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
Read the analysisDolby International v HP PPS Sverige (CFI, 26 June 2024)
Read the French analysisTridonic v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics (CFI, 21 June 2024)
By an order of 20 June 2024 (UPC_CFI_459/2023, ACT_590302/2023, CC_16360/2023, ORD_36553/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division, having heard the parties, decided to hear together Tridonic GmbH & Co KG's infringement action on EP 2 011 218 B1 against CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co.,…
Read the analysisSyngenta v Sumi Agro (CFI, 16 June 2024)
By an order of 16 June 2024 (UPC_CFI_201/2024, ACT_23636/2024, ORD_33490/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, Matthias Zigann, in Syngenta Limited's provisional measures proceedings based on EP 2 152 073 against Sumi Agro Limited and Sumi Agro Europe Limited, granted the…
Read the analysisOerlikon Textile v Bhagat Textile Engineers (CFI, 14 May 2024)
By procedural order of 14 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_241/2023, ACT_549585/2023, ORD_27218/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division set the arrangements for the interim conference of 27 May 2024 in Oerlikon Textile's infringement action against Bhagat Textile Engineers on EP 2 145 848.
Read the analysisSeoul Viosys v Photon Wave (CFI, 6 May 2024)
By an order of 6 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023, ACT_588685/2023, ORD_18404/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division (C.
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, ORD_23580/2024, 30 April 2024)
By an order of 30 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_463/2023), the Düsseldorf Local Division (presiding judge and judge-rapporteur: Thomas), hearing an application for provisional measures by 10x Genomics, Inc.
Read the analysisAIM Sport Development v Supponor Italia (CoA, 26 April 2024)
By order of 26 April 2024 (UPC_CoA_500/2023), the Court of Appeal held admissible AIM Sport Development's appeal against the Helsinki Local Division's rejection of its application for provisional measures against five Supponor companies (EP 3 295 663), although it was lodged within…
Read the analysisCurio Bioscience v 10x Genomics (CFI, 23 April 2024)
By an order of 23 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_463/2023, ACT_590953/2023, ORD_22211/2024), presiding judge Thomas, acting as judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, allowed the division to issue its orders and decisions in German with a certified English translation, in the provisional measures proceedings…
Read the analysisSeoul Viosys v expert klein (CFI, 22 April 2024)
Read the French analysisDaedalus Prime v Xiaomi Communications (CFI, 18 April 2024)
By order of 18 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_169/2024), the Hamburg Local Division, in Daedalus Prime's infringement action based on EP 2 792 100, refused to allow the statement of claim to be served on Xiaomi Communications and Xiaomi Inc.
Read the analysisOrtovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 15 April 2024)
By a procedural order of 15 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_16/2024, ACT_2379/2024, CC_17292/2024, ORD_18121/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Thomas, presiding, Thom, Schober) decided to hear together the infringement action on EP 3 466 498 B1 brought by Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH against Mammut Sports Group…
Read the analysisOcado Innovation v Autostore (CoA, 10 April 2024)
In a decision of 10 April 2024 (UPC_CoA_404/2023), the Court of Appeal dismissed Ocado Innovation's appeal against the order of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division granting a member of the public access to the statement of claim filed against the Autostore companies, the…
Read the analysisAWM v Progress Maschinen & Automatio (CFI, 8 April 2024)
Read the French analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 April 2024)
By a procedural order of 3 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_52/2023, ACT_462984/2023, CC_581179/2023, CC_581177/2023, ORD_16076/2024), the Munich Local Division (Zigann, presiding and judge-rapporteur, Zhilova, Pichlmaier, Loibner) decided to hear together, before itself, the infringement action on EP 1 838 002 brought by Avago Technologies…
Read the analysisNOVAWELL v C-KORE SYSTEMS (CFI, 26 March 2024)
By an order of 26 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_397/2023, ORD_12088/2024), judge-rapporteur Lignières of the Paris Local Division set up a confidentiality club for the confidential information in the expert's report of 5 February 2024, drawn up following the saisie ordered on 14 November…
Read the analysisNanoString Germany v 10x Genomics (CoA, 11 March 2024)
By order of 11 March 2024 (UPC_CoA_335/2023, APL_576355/2023), the Court of Appeal, in the panel that ruled on NanoString's appeal against 10x Genomics and the President and Fellows of Harvard College (EP 4 108 782), corrected, after hearing the parties, an obvious…
Read the analysisSeoul Viosys v Laser Components (CFI, 27 February 2024)
By an order of 27 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023, ACT_588685/2023, ORD_10099/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division (C. Lignieres), after consulting the panel, declined to propose to the parties a change from French to English, the language in which EP 3 404…
Read the analysisAIM Sport Development v Supponor (CoA, 26 February 2024)
Read the French analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi Technology Germany (CFI, ORD_7585/2024, 22 February 2024)
By an order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_223/2023), the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 2 207 270 against Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH and five other companies, decided to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim…
Read the analysisPanasonic v OROPE Germany (CFI, ORD_7587/2024, 22 February 2024)
By an order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_216/2023), the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 3 096 315 against OROPE Germany GmbH and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
Read the analysisPanasonic v OROPE Germany (CFI, ORD_7452/2024, 22 February 2024)
By order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_210/2023), the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, H.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi Technology Germany (CFI, ORD_7586/2024, 22 February 2024)
By order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_218/2023), the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, H.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v OROPE Germany (CFI, 22 February 2024)
By an order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_222/2023), the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 2 207 270 against OROPE Germany GmbH and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi Technology Germany (CFI, ORD_7453/2024, 22 February 2024)
By order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_219/2023), the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, H.
Read the analysisMeril v Edwards Lifesciences (CoA, 15 February 2024)
By procedural order of 15 February 2024 (UPC_CoA_2/2024, APL_83/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal set at EUR 11,000 the fee payable for Meril's appeal against the costs decision of the Munich Local Division of 19 December 2023, made when closing…
Read the analysisPlant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 15 February 2024)
By an order of 15 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_239/2023, ORD_8243/2024), The Hague Local Division, in the infringement action on EP 2 137 782 brought by Plant-e Knowledge B.V.
Read the analysisAbbott Diabetes Care v Dexcom (CFI, 12 February 2024)
By an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_425/2023, ORD_7664/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.'s infringement action on EP 3 988 471 against Dexcom Inc., Dexcom International Limited and Dexcom France SAS, aligned the start of…
Read the analysisDexCom v Abbott Laboratories (CFI, 12 February 2024)
By an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_395/2023, ORD_7657/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in DexCom, Inc.'s infringement action on EP 3 831 282 against Abbott Laboratories and thirteen other defendants, aligned the start of the time limit for the…
Read the analysis