Panasonic v OROPE Germany (CFI, ORD_7587/2024, 22 February 2024)
| Date | 22 February 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic Order |
| Registry reference | ORD_7587/2024 |
| Parties | Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. OROPE Germany GmbH, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By an order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_216/2023), the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic Holdings Corporation’s infringement action on EP 3 096 315 against OROPE Germany GmbH and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd., decided to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation itself, before the written procedure had closed. The order is short, but it shows that the Article 33(3) UPCA option can be settled very early, here so that a technically qualified judge could be allocated promptly.
Question
May the local division decide how to deal with the counterclaim for revocation before the written procedure has closed, and should it keep the whole dispute?
Decision
Rule 37.1 RoP calls for a decision as soon as practicable after the closure of the written procedure, but Rule 37.2 RoP allows an earlier decision once the parties have been heard. They had raised no objection. An early decision was justified because the court is still in its early days and some judges sit part-time or case by case, so the technically qualified judge should be allocated early. On the option itself, hearing infringement, revocation and the counterclaim concerning a FRAND licence together was considered sensible on efficiency grounds and ensures that the same panel construes the patent uniformly. The judge-rapporteur is to ask the President of the Court of First Instance to allocate a technically qualified judge.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: a defendant seeking referral of its revocation counterclaim to the central division should raise it at the first scheduling exchanges, since the division may settle the Article 33(3) option before the written procedure ends.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 33(3)(a)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 37.1 and 37.2
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- defendantOROPE Germany GmbH23 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantGuangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.24 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantPanasonic Holdings Corporation47 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic Order
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division locale de Mannheim décide, avant la clôture de la procédure écrite et sans objection des parties, d'instruire ensemble l'action en contrefaçon et la demande reconventionnelle en nullité, et fait demander l'affectation d'un juge technicien.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 096 315mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.