Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 4 December 2025)

Date	4 December 2025
Court	CFI
Division	Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Generic Order
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_307/2025
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_307/2025
Parties	Aesculap AG v. Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument Co. Ltd. a. o.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

27 August 2026 : Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 27 August 2026) UPC_CFI_307/2025
1 September 2026 : Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 1 September 2026) UPC_CFI_307/2025
16 October 2026 : Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 16 October 2026) UPC_CFI_307/2025

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_307/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantAesculap AG9 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantShanghai Bojin Medical Instrument Co. Ltd. a. oFollow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

4 December 2025 Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 4 December 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_307/2025
27 August 2026 Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 27 August 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_307/2025
La division locale de Düsseldorf confirme la transaction entre Aesculap et deux défenderesses, laisse à chacune ses frais, ordonne la confidentialité des termes et poursuit l'instance contre la troisième.
1 September 2026 Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 1 September 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_307/2025
La division locale de Düsseldorf juge que les deux fraises reproduisent la revendication 1 et retient la responsabilité d'intermédiaire, et non de contrefacteur, du mandataire européen du fabricant, à qui elle interdit ses services en Allemagne, en France et, sous condition, au Royaume-Uni.
16 October 2026 Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 16 October 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_307/2025
La division locale de Düsseldorf déclare recevable mais rejette la demande d’Aesculap tendant à rectifier la condition assortissant les mesures prononcées pour le Royaume-Uni.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Generic Order
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): L'audience est fixée au 17 juin 2026 et Shanghai Bojin Electric Instrument & Device est mise en cause. Une solution procédurale est proposée aux parties sur la restitutio et l'extension de l'action.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 2 892 442 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 1 September 2026) cited in this record
Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 27 August 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 2 892 442` Surgical, torque-transmitting instrument including associated tool recorded proprietor: Aesculap AG	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 8 other decision(s): Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 1 September 2026) · Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 27 August 2026) · Aesculap v Shanghai International Holding Corporation (Europe) (CFI, 3 · Aesculap v Shanghai International Holding Corporation (Europe) (CFI, 1 · Aesculap v Shanghai International Holding (CFI, 23 June 2025) · Aesculap v Shanghai International (Eur) (CFI, 10 June 2025) · Aesculap v Shanghai International Holding (CFI, 1 May 2025) · Aesculap v Shanghai Bojin Medical Instrument (CFI, 16 October 2026)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.