Counterclaim for revocation

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Counterclaim for revocation" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

Find a decision in three steps

1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.

Scope, method and reading key

UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.

Advanced search

Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.

Words, party, number, patentSearch in

CollectionLegal issueOutcomeCourt (UPC)DivisionType of actParty (normalised name)PatentFromTo with the firm’s analysis

Favourites are kept in this browser only.

Compare two parties or two issues

Party AParty B

Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.

72 decisions recorded

Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 29 October 2026)

29 October 2026 CFI / Brussels (BE) Local Division / Counterclaim for revocation Decision with commentary

In an order of 29 October 2026 under Rule 353 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division, seized the same day by the defendants with Establishment Labs’ agreement, rectifies para.

Read the analysis

Establishment Labs v GC Aesthetics (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2026, 28 October 2026)

28 October 2026 CFI / Brussels (BE) Local Division / Counterclaim for revocation Decision with commentary

In an order of 28 October 2026 under Rule 105 RoP (UPC_CFI_1357/2025 and UPC_CFI_629/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Brussels Local Division followed up on the interim conference held by videoconference on 27 October 2026 in Establishment Labs’ action for infringement of EP…

Read the analysis

Alpina Coffee Systems v CUP&CINO (CFI, UPC_CFI_68/2025, 22 October 2026)

22 October 2026 CFI / Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division / Counterclaim for revocation Decision with commentary

This entry corresponds to the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_68/2025, decided by the Düsseldorf Local Division on 22 October 2026 in respect of EP 3 281 569 B1, together with the infringement action UPC_CFI_47/2025.

Read the analysis

BF exaQC v Google (CFI, 19 October 2026)

19 October 2026 CFI / Mannheim (DE) Local Division / Counterclaim for revocation Decision with commentary

Access to the case file (167)
Admissibility (9)
Appeals (523)
Case management (16)
Claim construction (17)
Confidentiality (131)
Costs (60)
Damages (4)
Declaration of non-infringement (3)
Default decisions (12)
Enforcement (4)
Evidence (52)
Infringement (483)
Inspection (22)
Intervention and joinder (1)
Inventive step (10)
Jurisdiction (62)
Language of proceedings (8)
Life sciences and pharma (124)
Novelty (9)
Opt-out (2)
Permanent injunction (2)
Preliminary objection (52)
Preservation of evidence (34)
Procedural orders (639)
Production of evidence (4)
Proportionality (2)
Provisional measures (142)
Recall and destruction (3)
Registry procedure (14)
Review of case management (41)
Revocation (172)
Settlement and withdrawal (118)
Standard-essential patents and FRAND (208)
Time limits (9)
Unitary patent and the EPO (9)