Corning v TCL Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_414/2025, 16 April 2026)
| Date | 16 April 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Counterclaim for revocation |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_414/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_414/2025 |
| Parties | Corning Incorporated v. TCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG and others |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 3 October 2025 : Corning v Hisense Gorenje Germany (CFI, 3 October 2025) UPC_CFI_819/2024 · UPC_CFI_414/2025
- 5 December 2025 : Centripetal v Keysight (CFI, UPC_CFI_414/2025, 5 December 2025) UPC_CFI_414/2025and · UPC_CFI_729/2024
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantCorning Incorporated11 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantTCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG and others2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 3 October 2025 Corning v Hisense Gorenje Germany (CFI, 3 October 2025) Withdrawal (RoP265) · UPC_CFI_414/2025
Le désistement de l'action à l'égard des sociétés LG et celui de leur demande reconventionnelle sont admis, les procédures se poursuivant contre Hisense et TCL, chaque partie au désistement supportant ses frais.
- 5 December 2025 Centripetal v Keysight (CFI, UPC_CFI_414/2025, 5 December 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_414/2025
L'action en contrefaçon est rejetée faute pour Centripetal d'avoir étayé la présence d'un « broker » face aux dénégations précises de Keysight. La demande reconventionnelle conditionnelle n'est pas jugée.
- 16 April 2026 Corning v TCL Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_414/2025, 16 April 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_414/2025
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Counterclaim for revocation
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Corning v TCL Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_819/2024, 16 April 2026) cited in this record
- Centripetal v Keysight (CFI, UPC_CFI_414/2025, 5 December 2025) cited in this record
- Corning v Hisense Gorenje Germany (CFI, 3 October 2025) cited in this record
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.