Opens in a new tab

Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network (CFI, UPC_CFI_185/2026, 17 August 2026)

Date17 August 2026
CourtCFI
DivisionBrussels (BE) Local Division
Type of actionCounterclaim for revocation
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_185/2026
Registry referenceUPC-CFI-0000185/2026
PartiesBarco N.V. v. Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology Co. Ltd., Yealink (Europe) Network Technology B.V.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_185/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 17 August 2026 Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network (CFI, UPC_CFI_185/2026, 17 August 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_185/2026
  2. 14 September 2026 Barco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network (CFI, UPC_CFI_185/2026, 14 September 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_185/2026

    La division locale de Bruxelles fixe la valeur de l'action en contrefaçon à 1 million d'euros et celle de la demande reconventionnelle en nullité à 1,5 million d'euros, et organise l'audience selon l'issue de l'appel pendant.

  3. 19 October 2026 Barco v Yealink (CFI, UPC_CFI_185/2026, 19 October 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_185/2026

    La division locale de Bruxelles confirme l’audience du 3 novembre 2026 après la confirmation en appel de l’ordonnance du 17 août 2026, arrête le minutage des plaidoiries et fixe au 28 octobre 2026 l’information sur un éventuel accord relatif aux frais répétibles.

  4. 19 October 2026 Barco v Yealink (CFI, 19 October 2026) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_185/2026

    Le juge rapporteur clôt la phase intermédiaire sans nouvel échange écrit, fixe la valeur du litige à 2 500 000 euros et maintient l'audience au 3 novembre 2026 après l'arrêt de la cour d'appel du 16 octobre 2026.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Counterclaim for revocation
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.