BFexaQC v NVIDIA (CFI, UPC_CFI_210/2025, 11 March 2026)

Date	11 March 2026
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Counterclaim for revocation
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_210/2025
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_210/2025
Parties	BFexaQC AG and ParTec AG v. NVIDIA Corporation and NVIDIA GmbH

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_210/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantBFexaQC AG and ParTec AG2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantNVIDIA Corporation and NVIDIA GmbH2 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

11 March 2026 BFexaQC v NVIDIA (CFI, UPC_CFI_210/2025, 11 March 2026) Counterclaim for revocation · UPC_CFI_210/2025
29 September 2026 NVIDIA v BF exaQC (CoA, 29 September 2026) Appeal · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
Les frais de l'appel conditionnel de NVIDIA s'élèvent à 27 720 euros sur la valeur fixée en première instance. 2 940 euros et 460 euros versés en trop lui sont remboursés.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Counterclaim for revocation
Appeal: An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

BFexaQC v NVIDIA (CFI, UPC_CFI_180/2025, 11 March 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.