Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Appeal" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
93 decisions recorded
In an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_169/2026 to UPC_CoA_172/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed Hybridgenerator’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Copenhagen Local Division of 17 September 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisIn an order of 27 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_71/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal orders the reimbursement of EUR 61,150 to Qualcomm. Qualcomm had paid EUR 90,300, the amount displayed by the CMS, for its cross-appeal against the Munich Local Division’s…
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_149/2026, decided by the order of 21 October 2026 of the standing judge of the Court of Appeal, given in German on the admissibility of the appeals.
Read the analysisBy an order of 21 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_181/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal, Emmanuel Gougé, denied the request for discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP lodged by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, AWS European Sovereign…
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_602/2025, brought by Agfa and decided by the Court of Appeal’s decision of 21 October 2026 on EP 3 388 490, given in ten joined appeals.
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_97/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismissed the application by Alpinestars S.p.A., Alpinestars Research S.p.A.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_145/2026), given without an oral hearing with the parties’ consent (Article 52(3) UPCA), the Court of Appeal dismissed Barco’s appeal against the order of the Brussels Local Division of 17 August 2026, which had refused…
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_89/2026, decided by the order of 13 October 2026 of the standing judge of the Court of Appeal. The application for leave to appeal against the Mannheim Local Division’s order of 22 May 2026, which had rejected…
Read the analysisBy an order of 13 October 2026, issued under UPC_CoA_88/2026 and UPC_CoA_89/2026, the UPC Court of Appeal, sitting as a single permanent judge, refused Rematec’s application for leave to appeal against the order of the Mannheim Local Division of 22 May 2026.
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_312/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal extended until 23 October 2026 the time limit for Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH and Kodak Holding GmbH to lodge their written comments on the application for rehearing…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 October 2026 in appeals UPC_CoA_146/2026, UPC_CoA_147/2026 and UPC_CoA_148/2026, the UPC Court of Appeal refused to extend by one month the time limit for Promosome LLC and The Scripps Research Institute to lodge their statements of grounds of…
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_78/2026, decided by the ruling of 9 October 2026 given in the joined appeals 77/2026 and 78/2026.
Read the analysisBy an order of 9 October 2026 in UPC_CoA_68/2026, UPC_CoA_69/2026, UPC_CoA_71/2026 and UPC_CoA_72/2026, the UPC Court of Appeal refused to re-establish Network System Technologies’ right to appeal against the Munich Local Division’s orders of 11 March 2026 (UPC_CFI_63/2024, UPC_CFI_64/2024 and UPC_CFI_65/2024).
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_69/2026, decided by the order of 9 October 2026 in which the Court of Appeal rules on applications for re-establishment of rights under Rule 320.
Read the analysisThis entry corresponds to appeal UPC_CoA_72/2026, decided by the order of 9 October 2026 in which the Court of Appeal rules on applications for re-establishment of rights under Rule 320.
Read the analysisBy decision of 9 October 2026 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_77/2026 and UPC_CoA_78/2026, the Court of Appeal, following a settlement, permitted the withdrawal of Dolby International's infringement action (UPC_CFI_135/2024) and of the counterclaim for revocation brought by Beko Germany and Arçelik (UPC_CFI_477/2024)…
Read the analysisBy order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_73/2026), the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Esko-Software and Esko-Graphics against the order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 27 April 2026 refusing to change the language of In(k)control's infringement…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 7 October 2026 (UPC_CoA_38/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the UPC Court of Appeal declined to hold an interim conference in the appeal brought by TCL Europe SAS against Corning Incorporated, closed the written procedure and listed the oral…
Read the analysisBy order of 5 October 2026 the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal orders the reimbursement to SharkNinja of thirty-seven thousand nine hundred euros of overpaid court fees, the value of the appeal having been set at half of the value retained…
Read the analysisBy order of 2 October 2026 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_99/2026 and UPC_CoA_110/2026, the Court of Appeal rejected the applications of Canfield Scientific and the other appellants to stay their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 23 April 2026, which…
Read the analysisBy order of 29 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_140/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal determined the court fees payable by NVIDIA for its conditional appeal against the dismissal of its counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 743 812 in its dispute with…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 September 2026 the Court of Appeal dismisses Emboline’s request that a written witness statement and the corresponding passages of AorticLab’s statement of response be disregarded as late-filed, in the dispute over EP 2 129 425.
Read the analysisBy order of 28 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_140/2026), the Court of Appeal granted NVIDIA re-establishment of its right to appeal against the Munich Local Division's decision of 11 March 2026, which had dismissed BF exaQC and ParTec's infringement action (EP 3 743 812)…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_126/2026), the Court of Appeal re-established Keysight Technologies' right to appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's decision of 5 December 2025, which had dismissed Centripetal's infringement action (EP 3 821 580) without ruling on the counterclaim…
Read the analysisThe Court of Appeal dismissed Sidel's appeal against the order of the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division rejecting its preliminary objection. It held that the question whether an action for a declaration of non-infringement can be filed before grant of the…
Read the analysisBy order of 18 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_121/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal brought by the Academy of Military Medical Sciences (AMMS) against the costs decision of the Milan Central Division of 10 July 2026, which ordered…
Read the analysisBy decision of 16 September 2026, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_919/2025 (infringement action) and UPC_CoA_920/2025 (counterclaim for revocation), the Court of Appeal held the cross-appeals of Heraeus Electronics and Vibrantz against the Munich Local Division's decision of 10 October 2025 on…
Read the analysisBy order of 10 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_97/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal rejected the request by Alpinestars, Alpinestars Research and Motocard Bike under Rule 361 RoP to declare manifestly inadmissible Dainese's appeal against the Milan Local Division's decision of 21…
Read the analysisBy order of 3 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismissed the request for English-Polish interpretation under Art. 51(2) UPCA made by the appellant, a natural person whose name is not published, who was the defendant in Amycel's…
Read the analysisBy order of 3 September 2026 (UPC_CoA_113/2026), the Court of Appeal, on WEPA Nederland's appeal against the review order of The Hague Local Division, upheld in substance the measures to preserve evidence and for inspection obtained ex parte by Essity under EP…
Read the analysisThe UPC Court of Appeal refuses to give suspensive effect to the application for rehearing filed by Fujifilm Corporation against its decision of 2 June 2026, which had upheld Kodak’s private prior use defence and dismissed the infringement action based on EP…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 28 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_678/2025), the Court of Appeal dismissed Hurom's appeal against the Paris Local Division's decision of 23 May 2025, which had revoked the Dutch, French, German and Italian parts of EP 3 155 936 (a juice…
Read the analysisBy order of 21 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_61/2026), the Court of Appeal set aside the Paris Local Division's order of 10 April 2026 refusing SharkNinja Operating provisional measures based on EP 3 689 198, and ordered the Groupe SEB companies, in France and…
Read the analysisBy order of 21 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_135/2026), the Court of Appeal dismissed the application by Nuna International and Allison for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's provisional measures order of 10 August 2026, granted to Cybex on EP…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 19 August 2026, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_908/2025, UPC_CoA_909/2025 and UPC_CoA_918/2025 (this note concerns file UPC_CoA_908/2025), the Court of Appeal upholds the dismissal of Hartmann Packaging's infringement action against the Omni-Pac companies based on EP 2 755…
Read the analysisIn a final order of 17 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_87/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses the Lepu companies' appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's order of 20 May 2026, which had declared EUR 58,800 in penalty payments forfeited for non-compliance with a provisional…
Read the analysisIn an order of 17 August 2026, given in the joined files UPC_CoA_40/2026 and UPC_CoA_123/2026, the Court of Appeal rejects Emboline's request under Rule 333 RoP for review of its clarification order of 16 July 2026 on how a conditional counterclaim for…
Read the analysisIn an order of 17 August 2026 issued in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_69/2026, UPC_CoA_71/2026 and UPC_CoA_72/2026, the UPC Court of Appeal rejected as inadmissible the appeals of Network System Technologies LLC (NST) against the Munich Local Division's dismissal of its requests for…
Read the analysisIn a final decision of 17 August 2026, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_365/2025 (infringement) and UPC_CoA_367/2025 (counterclaim for revocation), the Court of Appeal rules on Knaus Tabbert AG's appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 10 April 2025 on EP…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 14 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_884/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal dismissed Sibio Technology Limited's appeal against the Paris Central Division decision rejecting its revocation action against Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.'s EP 3 831 283, which concerns an on-body glucose…
Read the analysisBy order of 11 August 2026, the Court of Appeal allows Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) and three group companies to withdraw their appeal (UPC_CoA_91/2026) against the Lisbon Local Division’s order of 26 May 2026 dismissing their application under Rules 360 and 361,…
Read the analysisBy order of 5 August 2026, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_118/2026, UPC_CoA_119/2026 and UPC_CoA_120/2026, the Court of Appeal rejects the requests of Dolby International AB and Vectis IP Ltd.
Read the analysisIn an order of 4 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_121/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal grants the Academy of Military Medical Sciences leave to appeal the Milan Central Division's order of 10 July 2026, which had ordered it to pay Gilead…
Read the analysisBy order of 3 August 2026 (UPC_CoA_28/2026), the Court of Appeal sets aside the Mannheim Local Division’s orders of 20 and 30 January 2026, which had ordered three Kodak companies jointly to pay penalties of EUR 1,720,000 for failing to comply with…
Read the analysisBy order of 3 August 2026, given in German in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_692/2025 and UPC_CoA_854/2025, the Court of Appeal allows Nera Innovations Ltd and four Xiaomi companies to withdraw their appeals against the Hamburg Local Division’s decision of 10 July 2025…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 July 2026, issued in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_77/2026 and UPC_CoA_78/2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal stayed the appeals against the Düsseldorf Local Division's order of 18 March 2026 (EP 3 605 534), at the request of…
Read the analysisIn a case management order of 27 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_113/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal instructs the Registry to reimburse EUR 9,600 to WEPA Nederland, which had paid EUR 14,600 in fees for its appeal against the order of The…
Read the analysisBy order of 22 July 2026, issued in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_63/2026 and UPC_CoA_64/2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal declined to rule in advance on the admissibility of eleven new auxiliary requests filed by Advanced Brain Monitoring with its statement…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 17 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_360/2025), the Court of Appeal, following a settlement, permitted Lionra to withdraw its appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's decision of 19 February 2025 (EP 2 201 740), held that Cisco's cross-appeal is deemed withdrawn…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 17 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_94/2026), the Court of Appeal permitted Siemens Healthineers and its affiliates to withdraw an application for suspensive effect lodged by mistake in the appeal file concerning the counterclaim for revocation, the intended application having then…
Read the analysisBy order of 17 July 2026, the Court of Appeal set aside the costs ruling of the Paris Central Division of 14 July 2025 and ordered Kodak, S.A. to bear the costs at both instances of the revocation action it had brought…
Read the analysisIn an order of 16 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_40/2026, EP 2 129 425), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal clarified how a counterclaim for revocation made conditional on a finding of infringement operates.
Read the analysisIn an order of 16 July 2026, made by the standing judge of the Court of Appeal in UPC_CoA_100/2026, UPC_CoA_101/2026 and UPC_CoA_102/2026, Shenzhen Transsion was permitted, with Ericsson's consent and following a settlement, to withdraw its appeals against the Hague Local Division's…
Read the analysisIn an order of 16 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that naming TGI Sport Virtual UK Limited in AIM Sport Development AG's statement of appeal against the Helsinki Local Division's order of 29 April 2026 on provisional…
Read the analysisIn an order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_93/2026, EP 2 352 431), the Court of Appeal rejected the application by Siemens Healthineers and its affiliates for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 10 June 2026, which…
Read the analysisIn an order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_936/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted InterDigital, with Amazon's consent, to withdraw its application for provisional measures and declared closed Amazon's appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's order of 22 December 2025, which had rejected…
Read the analysisIn an order of 15 July 2026 common to the five appeals UPC_CoA_68/2026 to UPC_CoA_72/2026 against the Munich Local Division's decisions of 11 March 2026 in the dispute between Network System Technologies LLC (NST) and Qualcomm, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of…
Read the analysisIn an order of 14 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_76/2026, EP 2 791 402), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal extended until service of the appeal decision the suspensive effect granted on 26 May 2026 to Xingi Technology and Jiangsu Jiuzhou Xingji against…
Read the analysisBy order of 30 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_768/2024, APL_64374/2024), the Court of Appeal sets aside the Milan Central Division’s order of 22 November 2024 and grants provisional measures against EOFlow, the Korean maker of the EOPatch and GlucoMen Day Pump insulin patch pumps,…
Read the analysis