Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 17 August 2026)

Date	17 August 2026
Court	CoA
Division	Luxembourg (LU)
Type of action	Appeal
Case number(s)	UPC_CoA_40/2026
Registry reference	UPC-COA-0000040/2026
Parties	Emboline, Inc. v. AorticLab srl

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

16 July 2026 : Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 16 July 2026) UPC-COA-0000040/2026
28 September 2026 : Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 28 September 2026) UPC-COA-0000040/2026

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CoA_40/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

defendantAorticLab srl6 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
claimantEmboline, Inc.7 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

16 July 2026 Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 16 July 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_40/2026
Une demande reconventionnelle en nullité peut être subordonnée à une constatation de contrefaçon. En cas d'appel du titulaire, le défendeur doit former un appel conditionnel, la taxe n'étant due que si l'appel principal est formé.
17 August 2026 Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 17 August 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_40/2026
28 September 2026 Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 28 September 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_40/2026
La cour d’appel rejette l’objection de tardiveté et refuse toute écriture ou pièce supplémentaire, la discussion sur la preuve critiquée étant renvoyée à l’audience, et clôt la procédure écrite sans conférence de mise en état.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Appeal
Appeal: Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance: Court of Appeal decision.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

AorticLab v Emboline (CoA, 17 August 2026) cited in this record
Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 16 July 2026) cited in this record
Emboline v AorticLab (CoA, 28 September 2026) cited in this record
Keysight Technologies v Centripetal (CoA, 28 September 2026) cites this decision

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.